M. Warner Losh wrote:
: - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks.
And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A large
component of the decision to remove it from the base was the high
incidence of security problems with the original code. That, coupled
with the
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic install is a pain.
Has this been well debated already ? or should I file a Send-PR ?
Julian Stacey
jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic install is a pain.
Has this been well debated already ? or should I file a Send-PR ?
It was moved
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
=20
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic install is a pa=
in.
=20
Has this been well debated already ? or should
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:48:49AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
=20
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks.
:
: No thanks. It was removed almost 2 years ago because
: better alternatives are available.
And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:48:49AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
=20
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic