Thanks for replies.
* Finally, default values for many things on 64-bit machines
have been adjusted upward significantly to make proper use
of available resources
Well that one should be fast to test, if it really makes so much
difference.
* Scheduler rewrite
They threw out old scheduler
on 14/10/2012 00:27 Pedro Giffuni said the following:
Actually ...
On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
Their explanation of the changes is here:
On 14.10.2012 12:47, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/10/2012 00:27 Pedro Giffuni said the following:
Actually ...
On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
Their explanation of the
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:09:47AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
* Scheduler rewrite
They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's
too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in
FreeBSD after all this time.
'loathe' appears to be an interesting choice of word.
I do
I do not loathe ULE, but I also do not use ULE.
Maybe my wording wasn't exactly suitable, but that was the
point I was trying to make. ULE is default for quite some
time (and boasted impressive benchmarks upon introduction too),
yet in reality 4BSD is far from being superseded for many.
--
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Re-new-DragonFly-3-2-scheduler-and-PostgreSQL-comparision-with-FreeBSD-9-1-RC1-tp5751589p5751733.html
Hello;
On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
I stopped following Dragonfly a while ago but it seems like
it was some VM SMP related work:
Actually ...
On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
Their explanation of the changes is here:
http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2012/09/19/10403.html
Cheers,
Pedro.
On 13 October 2012 14:27, Pedro Giffuni p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Actually ...
On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
Their explanation of the changes is here:
On 12 October 2012 11:10, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
I don't like comparing Release Candidates without any details about config,
but the fact that DF 3.2 is much better than DF 3.0 is interesting. And they
are very close to performance of Scientific Linux 6.2.
Hey cool! And
10 matches
Mail list logo
