We discuss rc on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feel free to send any ideas
to that list.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
not one that prevent syslog from
running or providing some minimal/degraded service level.
This is a known shortcoming in the new rc system. Luke Mewburn
commented on it in a talk recently but does not yet have a
satisfactory solution.
Can you describe in more detail what you mean
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:00:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
[re-ordering rc.d scripts]
This is a known shortcoming in the new rc system. Luke Mewburn
commented on it in a talk recently but does not yet have a
satisfactory solution.
Can you describe in more detail what you mean
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 04:36 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 05:00:49PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
[re-ordering rc.d scripts]
This is a known shortcoming in the new rc system. Luke Mewburn
commented on it in a talk recently but does not yet have a
satisfactory
though. :)
This is a known shortcoming in the new rc system. Luke Mewburn
commented on it in a talk recently but does not yet have a
satisfactory solution.
Can you describe in more detail what you mean by this is a known
shortcoming?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Hello,
while installing new maschines I ran in the difficulty, that I need a link
from /dev/ttyd0 to /dev/refclock-0. Okay, thats easy. Just put a line in
/etc/devfs.conf.
Next problem is that /etc/rc.d/ntpd is evaluated before /etc/rc.d/devfs (see
the output of rcorder /etc/rc.d*) So the start
to circumvent this problem? By simply adding a
# REQUIRE: devfs to the /etc/rc.d/ntpd file? Or this there some other
mechanism?
This is a known shortcoming in the new rc system. Luke Mewburn
commented on it in a talk recently but does not yet have a
satisfactory solution.
Assuming
