On 28.05.2014 18:10, Dirk Engling wrote:
set during poudriere builds. Default options for some graphic related
ports like graphics/gd unfortunally litter all my jails with their libX*
dependencies.
For those graphics libraries, the dependency to libX11 is only required
to support the XPM image
According to David Chisnall on Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:19:41AM +0100:
We can probably do a bit better by looking at the complete dependency graph
and removing any ports that have unconditional dependencies on X. For a
headless server, there's no reason to build any of the kde-* or gnome-*
On 2 Jun 2014, at 16:12, Ollivier Robert robe...@keltia.freenix.fr wrote:
According to David Chisnall on Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:19:41AM +0100:
We can probably do a bit better by looking at the complete dependency graph
and removing any ports that have unconditional dependencies on X. For a
According to David Chisnall on Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:27:23PM +0100:
Yes. If you want to have the graphical versions of everything on the server,
then there's nothing stopping you from using the default package repository.
THe use case for the proposed no-X repo is installing a headless
On 29 May 2014, at 23:06, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote:
Having a parent set would be nice, yes. I maintain two repos for several
FreeBSD-versions. Being able to pull some of the deps from packages instead
of blindingly building would be nice.
Yes, for a lot of cases you only want
On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or Build it all.
If a port is only needed for WITH_X11 then an IGNORE should be added to it
when WITHOUT_X11 is set to prevent wasting time on it.
We can probably do a
On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or Build it all.
If a port is only needed for WITH_X11 then an IGNORE should be added to it
On 2014-05-29 08:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or Build it all.
If a port is only needed for WITH_X11
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2014-05-29 08:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
As for skipping unneeded ports
Hey,
I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official repo
suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
WITHOUT_QT4=true
WITHOUT_X11=true
set during poudriere builds. Default options for some graphic related
ports like graphics/gd unfortunally litter all my
On 28 May 2014, at 18:10, Dirk Engling erdge...@erdgeist.org wrote:
Hey,
I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official repo
suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
WITHOUT_QT4=true
WITHOUT_X11=true
set during poudriere builds. Default
On 28 May 2014, at 17:10, Dirk Engling erdge...@erdgeist.org wrote:
I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official repo
suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
There aren't currently any plans, but we're now bringing online the
infrastructure for
On 2014-05-28 16:44, David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2014, at 17:10, Dirk Engling erdge...@erdgeist.org wrote:
I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official
repo suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
There aren't currently any plans, but we're now
13 matches
Mail list logo
