rnel mode
>> cpuid = 0; apic id = 20
>> fault virtual address = 0x0
>> fault code = supervisor write data, page not present
>> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x804e0db4
>> stack pointer = 0x0:0xfffffe0434de4e10
>> frame pointer
inter = 0x20:0x804e0db4
>> stack pointer = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e10
>> frame pointer = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70
>> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
>> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
>>
address = 0x0
>> fault code = supervisor write data, page not present
>> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x804e0db4
>> stack pointer = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e10
>> frame pointer = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70
>> code segment = base 0x0, lim
e4e70
> >> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
> >> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
> >> processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
> >> current process = 82990 (c++)
> >> trap numbe
segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 82990 (c++)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
time = 163998
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0
0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 82990 (c++)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
time = 163998
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0x8050fc95 at kdb_backtrace+0x65
#1
, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 82990 (c++)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
time = 163998
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0x8050fc95 at kdb_backtrace+0x65
#1 0x804c468f at vpanic+0x17f
#2
ointer = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e10
> frame pointer = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70
> code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
> processor eflags = resume, IOPL = 0
> current process = 82
= 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 82990 (c++)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
time
= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
> current process = 12 (irq36: iwn0)
> trap number = 12
> panic: page fault
> cpuid = 4
> time = 1604056852
> KDB: stac
= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
> = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
> processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
> current process = 12 (irq36: iwn0)
> trap number = 12
> panic: page fault
> cpuid = 4
> time = 1604056852
> KDB: stac
, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 12 (irq36: iwn0)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 4
time = 1604056852
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x804a69db =
db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0x8241d3f0
vpanic() at 0x80baf802 = vpanic+0x182/frame
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:41:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> My build machine had no issues with the upgrade from r361784 to r361830,
> but my laptop panicked during the transition from single- to multi-user
> mode, just after bpf was attached.
> .
Thanks to Hans Petter Selasky (who
= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 0 (iwn0 net80211 taskq)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 3
time = 1591362374
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x804a4afb =
db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe0fc08c37b0
vpanic() at 0xff
process = 0 (iwn0 net80211 taskq)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 3
time = 1591362374
KDB: stack backtrace:
db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x804a4afb =
db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe0fc08c37b0
vpanic() at 0x80b93452 = vpanic+0x182/frame 0xf
Info at http://slexy.org/raw/s21qACK3qQ.
On the 1st boot after the panic, the crash dump failed due to insufficient
amount of space on /. Then I removed some files, restarted the system, and the
dump was redone. Is it correct to assume that the dump was not damaged?
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 12 (irq256: bce0)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
#6 0x80bb5e53 in calltrap ()
at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:228
= 12
panic: page fault
#6 0x80bb5e53 in calltrap ()
at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:228
#7 0x80933e07 in m_copym (m=0x0, off0=1500, len=1480, wait=1)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:542
#8 0x809f8b76 in ip_fragment (ip=0xfe004b2f3980,
m_frag
http://privatepaste.com/147286442b
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, def32 1, gran1
processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 80 (sh)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
syncing disks, buffers remaining... 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184
184 184 184 184
giving up on 148 buffers
Uptime: 16s
process = 80 (sh)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
syncing disks, buffers remaining... 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184
184 184 184 184
giving up on 148 buffers
Uptime: 16s
Terminate ACPI
PLEASE HELP ME
On 1 Dec, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote:
Can you reproduce this problem without bktr?
snip
You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the
file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount
list entry each time.
was configured as i386-undermydesk-freebsd...
panic: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0505b53
stack pointer = 0x10:0xd7f2ea88
frame
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:13, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't
change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is
different though (but always seems to be file system related in some
way)
Here's one from today:
As
On 30 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:13, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't
change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is
different though (but always seems to be file system related in some
Can you reproduce this problem without bktr?
#6 0xc06743d8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:94
#7 0xc0505b53 in _mtx_lock_flags (m=0x0, opts=0,
file=0xc06bfc1d /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c, line=228)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:214
#8 0xc0502b54 in lockmgr
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote:
Can you reproduce this problem without bktr?
snip
You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the
file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount
list entry each time. Maybe the mount list is getting
On 1 Dec, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote:
Can you reproduce this problem without bktr?
snip
You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the
file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount
list entry each time.
Hello,
I upgraded my machine to CURRENT of today. It was paniced at while the
ppp process was making the IPv6 tunnel. When I rebooted it several
times, the problem occurred in the same place (currnet process = ppp).
Now I'm using an older kernel(cvsuped October 2). This older kernel
works fine.
it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type show copying to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as i386-undermydesk-freebsd...
panic: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
Processor eflags = interupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
Current process = 29 (irq9: ahc0 ips0)
Trap number = 12
Panic = page fault
Did I do something wrong or is there a problem with the driver? :(
I can't see an invalid eip
Yep! The patch seems to have fixed the problem! :-)
Thanks Luoqi!!
Bob
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 11:42:21PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
I have been making world each time after cvsupping so I would expect the
mfs kld module to be getting rebuilt and it appears to be up-to-date:
, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 40 (mount_mfs)
interrupt mask =
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
Any ideas on what may be wrong?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox
processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 40 (mount_mfs)
interrupt mask=
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
Any ideas on what may be wrong?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 01:03:50PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I use mfs a lot and have had no trouble whatsoever. I'm using:
swap/tmpmfs rw,-s=200 0
Do you suppose that the usage of /dev/da0s1b directly is what's causing
some trouble?
, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 40 (mount_mfs)
interrupt mask=
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
Any ideas on what may be wrong?
Thanks,
Bob
= 0
current process = 40 (mount_mfs)
interrupt mask =
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
Any ideas on what may be wrong?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox The man who follows the crowd will usually get
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 01:47:59PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I use mfs a lot and have had no trouble whatsoever. I'm using:
swap/tmpmfs rw,-s=200 0
Do you suppose that the usage of /dev/da0s1b directly is what's causing
= 12
panic: page fault
Any ideas on what may be wrong?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Willcox The man who follows the crowd will usually get no
b...@luke.pmr.comfurther than the crowd. The man who walks alone is
Austin, TX likely
It happens with plain UFS, I have no NFS.
Pre-new-VM kernel not cause page fault
--
Andrey A. Chernov
a...@null.net
MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC+ D A a++ C G+ QH+(++) 666+++ Y
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:27:17PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
Pre-new-VM kernel not cause page fault
Sorry for false alarm - it seems that new socket code hits again and not
new VM:
#4 0xf019cc3e in trap ()
#5 0xf013aa20 in soclose ()
#6 0xf01314e2 in soo_close ()
#7 0xf011c456 in
41 matches
Mail list logo
