Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Jeff Roberson said: > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > >> "Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The source tree was retrieved by cvsup >>> at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. >>> >>> This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. >>> >>> I have the core and kernel.debug, so any >>> furth

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > "Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The source tree was retrieved by cvsup > > at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. > > > > This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. > > > > I have the core and kernel.debug, so any > > further postmortem is possible.

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Robert Watson said: > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > > > One other point, the machine was doing a background fsck on /var. Does > > a background fsck go through ffs_snapshot()? > > Yes -- the background file system checker creates a snapshot of the file > system in the un-chec

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > I came to the same conclusion after I sent the original email. > > What I don't understand is how I ended up in ffs_snapshot(), because I > don't have a snapshot of /var. I tried snapshots when Kirk first > introduced the feature, but I removed all

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Brian F. Feldman
"Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian F. Feldman said: > > "Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The source tree was retrieved by cvsup > > > at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. > > > > > > This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. > > > > > > I have the core and kernel.debug, so

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Brian F. Feldman said: > "Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The source tree was retrieved by cvsup > > at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. > > > > This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. > > > > I have the core and kernel.debug, so any > > further postmortem is possible. > > I think the prob

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Brian F. Feldman
"Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The source tree was retrieved by cvsup > at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. > > This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. > > I have the core and kernel.debug, so any > further postmortem is possible. I think the problem is that in src/sys/ufs/ffs/ ffs_snapsho

panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ panic: from debugger panic messages: --- panic: mutex vnode in