> > That will certainly be a big help. When we got rid of the pkg/ and
> > patches/ directories I begged Satoshi to go farther and put patches in
> > main port directory and get rid of pkg/COMMENT. That was back when we
> > hit 3000 ports -- I guess people didn'
hi, there!
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:36:51PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
> > > to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
> > > it
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 12:23:19PM -0700, Eric Melville wrote:
> > Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
> > to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
> > it would speed up updates.
>
> http://p
> Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
> to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
> it would speed up updates.
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~eric/ports-comment.diff
Will Andrews said that portmgr would be g
Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
it would speed up updates.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Wed May 15, 2002 at 09:55:42PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> The Anarcat wrote:
> >
> > [putting anti-flame on]
s/on/suit on/
> To invite a normal discussion you should at least provide the
> following information:
Well, I expected people to look at the port, but I'll provide more
informat
'un seul est barbarie, car c'est au détriment de tous les
> autres. Fût-ce l'amour de Dieu.
> - Nietzsche, "Par delà le bien et le mal"
>
> --
>
> Subject: Re: cvs
[putting anti-flame on]
--
N'aimer qu'un seul est barbarie, car c'est au détriment de tous les
autres. Fût-ce l'amour de Dieu.
- Nietzsche, "Par delà le bien et le mal"
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 15 May 2002 13:16:52 -0400
The Anarcat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wh
On 2 Apr, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>> Oh that is easy to fix. We can do it in one of two ways.
>> Show me the exact link line from icc (I want the equivalent to gcc -v).
I don't know how to produce something like with icc, but...
> We can also tell 'icc' to use our 'ld'.
>
> -Qlocation,ld,/usr
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:31:39AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> You can't link native FreeBSD binaries with icc, it tries to link
> against glibc.
Oh that is easy to fix. We can do it in one of two ways.
Show me the exact link line from icc (I want the equivalent to gcc -v).
--
-- Davi
On 1 Apr, David O'Brien wrote:
>> > This is fine just to get things working. But please consider Doing It
>> > Right -- that being wrap the definitions of CC, CFLAGS, and PICFLAG with
>> > USE_ICC rather than strew USE_ICC all over the place. For instance:
>> >
>> > /usr/share/mk/sys.mk
>
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 10:03:47AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On 29 Mär, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> >> > My patches to src/share/mk/ are here:
> >> >
> >> > ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/icc.mk.diff
> >> >
> >> > This allows you to set 'USE_ICC' and 'ICFLAGS' and build stuff.
> >
>
On 29 Mär, David O'Brien wrote:
>> Not tested, feel free to point out some typo's:
>> http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/icc.mk.diff
>
> Also forbidden to access.
Fixed. Sorry.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Reboot America.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexand
On 29 Mär, David O'Brien wrote:
>> > My patches to src/share/mk/ are here:
>> >
>> >ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/icc.mk.diff
>> >
>> > This allows you to set 'USE_ICC' and 'ICFLAGS' and build stuff.
>
> This is fine just to get things working. But please consider Doing It
> Right -- t
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 11:44:06AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > My patches to src/share/mk/ are here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/icc.mk.diff
> >
> > This allows you to set 'USE_ICC' and 'ICFLAGS' and build stuff.
This is fine just to get things working. But please co
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:33:37PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Not tested, feel free to point out some typo's:
> http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/icc.mk.diff
Also forbidden to access.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mes
On 29 Mär, An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> My patches to src/share/mk/ are here:
>>
>> ftp://ftp.jurai.net/users/winter/icc.mk.diff
Not tested, feel free to point out some typo's:
http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/icc.mk.diff
It's based upon your patch and addresses the points below.
> My
On 28 Mär, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>> I've tried to give it a start, so I also allowed __ICC in pcpu.h, now it
>> fails with:
>
> I got most of src/bin src/sbin src/usr.bin src/usr.sbin and lib to compile
> with it.
Does libm work? At my first try (January) ICC complained about some
files. But p
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 08:23:27PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:37:25PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > > icc.cfg:
> > ...
> > > -D__GNUC__=2
> >
> > This is really wrong. Why not properly impliment cdefs.h for __ICC__
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:37:25PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> icc.cfg:
...
> -D__GNUC__=2
This is really wrong. Why not properly impliment cdefs.h for __ICC__ ?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body
[cvs* stripped, -current added]
On 27 Mär, I wrote:
> I just startet a LINT compile (-current as of ~2 hours ago) with icc,
> expect the compile log to appear at http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/ as
> soon as it finishes.
> I also will include a list of generated object files at the end of the
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
