Hi all,
For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
in the TX path. It's quite possible these have introduced regressions. I'd
like to make sure
Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!
Adrian
On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael wrote:
> On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> > appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD
On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
> in the TX path. I
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> I've done a variety of changes to the radio setup and found/fixed a few bugs
> in the TX path. It's quite pos
On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!
>
> Adrian
>
> On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael wrote:
>
> > On Thu 03 March 2011 at 02:31:05PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > For those of you who are test
What was the previous performance? And which chipsets?
Adrian
On 6 March 2011 00:30, Urankar Mikael wrote:
> On Sat 05 March 2011 at 03:27:48AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Absolutely! Let me know if I've broken anything!
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > On 5 March 2011 00:45, Urankar Mikael >wrote:
Which versions did you have stable versus unstable AR9285 behaviour?
I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
Thanks,
Adrian
On 6 March 2011 22:24, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying to associate with
00:30:4f:58:bf:94 (SSI
2011/3/6 Ian FREISLICH :
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd really
>> appreciate it if you'd update to -HEAD and re-test.
>
> Since running the new code, I get a slew of these:
>
> Mar 6 14:41:53 mini wpa_supplicant[422]: Trying to as
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
> start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
Is this all the source?
Old:
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c,v 1.300 2011/02/21 19:22:45 adrian Exp $
$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath_debu
On 7 March 2011 03:21, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I'd like to establish at least a range of subversion revisions so we can
> > start binary searching which one(s) caused instabilities.
>
> Is this all the source?
>
> Old:
> $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/ath/if_ath.c,v 1.300 2011/02/21
>
> On 7 March 2011 07:27, daren wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 14:31 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > For those of you who are testing out my if_ath changes, I'd
> really
> > appreciate it if you'd update to -HE
hello!
FreeBSD 9.0-900033-CURRENT #0 r219338M: Mon Mar 7 11:31:40 VLAT 2011
All fine with AR9285, WPA2 is used
stable 36/48/54Mbps with my AP
07.03.2011, 06:14, "Adrian Chadd" :
> On 7 March 2011 03:21, Ian FREISLICH ; wrote:
>
>> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>> I'd like to establish at least a range
So you're saying -head is better, right?
Adrian
On 9 March 2011 15:35, Urankar Mikael wrote:
> Here are some dumb benchmarks through ftp :
>
> with 8.2R RX rate is 2400kBps and TX rate is 810KBps
> on a 9-CURRENT RX rate is 2700kBps and TX rate is 2700kBps
>
> More info on my system :
> ath0@pc
Woo. That's great news. On a non-11n card too. Excellent!
adrian
On 9 March 2011 17:12, Urankar Mikael wrote:
> Yes !
>
> On Wed 09 March 2011 at 04:58:50PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > So you're saying -head is better, right?
> >
> > On 9 March 2011 15:35, Urankar Mikael >wrote:
> >
> > >
15 matches
Mail list logo
