Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-10 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 11:44:47PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: As Ruslan Ermilov wrote: You need to configure /some/ interface address for the remote end anyway, and it must not clash with any other routing table entry, since ifconfig ... up always adds an entry for the remote IP

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:01:12PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: As Ruslan Ermilov wrote: phk has chosen 0.0.0.1 since it obviously cannot be a meaningful statically configured address. OK, but is it really necessary? It's much simpler to add routes over P2P interfaces using the

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-08 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Ruslan Ermilov wrote: You need to configure /some/ interface address for the remote end anyway, and it must not clash with any other routing table entry, since ifconfig ... up always adds an entry for the remote IP address for p2p interfaces. Only if you have INET address configured

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-07 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 7 Dez, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: The magical destination address is 0.0.0.1. It is used as a `placeholder' address for the remote side, so you can add a route to it. Should probably be extended to 0.0.0.*, so you can add more than one interface that way. I thought this already

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-07 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Ruslan Ermilov wrote: phk has chosen 0.0.0.1 since it obviously cannot be a meaningful statically configured address. OK, but is it really necessary? It's much simpler to add routes over P2P interfaces using the interface name ... You need to configure /some/ interface address for

rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Hi, with rev 1.61 of in.c I4B directly hangs up after dialing out. At the moment I run a current kernel as of yesterday with a netinet directory as of today except for in.c (which is at rev 1.60 here) and everything works fine. Bye, Alexander. -- The computer revolution is over. The

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-06 Thread Brian Somers
Hi, with rev 1.61 of in.c I4B directly hangs up after dialing out. At the moment I run a current kernel as of yesterday with a netinet directory as of today except for in.c (which is at rev 1.60 here) and everything works fine. Hi, Can you give me more details about the failure - error

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 01:52:49PM +, Brian Somers wrote: Hi, with rev 1.61 of in.c I4B directly hangs up after dialing out. At the moment I run a current kernel as of yesterday with a netinet directory as of today except for in.c (which is at rev 1.60 here) and everything works

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-06 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 6 Dez, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: with rev 1.61 of in.c I4B directly hangs up after dialing out. At the moment I run a current kernel as of yesterday with a netinet directory as of today except for in.c (which is at rev 1.60 here) and everything works fine. Can you give me more details

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-06 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISTR that I4B uses some special magical destination address for some purpose (0.0.0.0 or something). The magical destination address is 0.0.0.1. It is used as a `placeholder' address for the remote side, so you can add a route to it. Should probably

Re: rev 1.61 of /sys/netinet/in.c breaks ISDN

2001-12-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:23:32PM +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISTR that I4B uses some special magical destination address for some purpose (0.0.0.0 or something). The magical destination address is 0.0.0.1. It is used as a `placeholder' address