* David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-18 05:32]:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote:
The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with sed -i.bak file, if
file.bak already exists, but perl does not.
Please file a PR about this.
done
Since
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:21:32AM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote:
BTW, why have you added BUILD_DEPENDS= perl:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5 to
net/rsync? Only for the patches?
Correct, for the use of perl -pi -e.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
[CC ports@ and current@]
* Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-16 13:02]:
Looks like the ${REINPLACE_CMD} patch didn't work:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/rsync-2.5.5_1.log
Fixed in PR ports/39365.
But I am not very happy with that fix.
The problem is that sed(1) on
Oliver Braun wrote:
The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with sed -i.bak file, if
file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile
uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the
backup file with ${RM} file.bak between the calls.
==
* Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-16 20:20]:
Oliver Braun wrote:
The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with sed -i.bak file, if
file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile
uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the
backup
