On Tue Feb 28 12, Chuck Burns wrote:
On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
that would
make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options,
such as
On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf could be
added before the release of freebsd 10.0? the way it is done atm is really not
intuitive. the rule should really be:
- make.conf = applies globally
- src.conf = applies
On Tue Feb 28 12, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf could
be
added before the release of freebsd 10.0? the way it is done atm is really
not
intuitive. the rule should really
On Tue Feb 28 12, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf could
be
added before the release of freebsd 10.0? the way it is done atm is really
not
intuitive. the rule should really
On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future? that would
make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options, such as
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 would simply work by setting
CFLAGS.gcc=-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
On Tue Feb 28 12, Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Feb 28 12, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-26 22:37, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance support for setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf
could be
added before the release of freebsd 10.0? the way it is done atm is
really
On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
that would
make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options,
such as
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 would simply work by setting
On 2/28/2012 16:08, Chuck Burns wrote:
On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote:
On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote:
any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future?
that would
make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options,
such as
