Bill Moran wrote:
> Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
>
> I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
> FreeBSD related) so I was wondering if some Windows trojan is running rampant
> and using these list addresses as return ad
Boy am I glad I use a *real* OS for my mail...
--Devon
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:03, Bill Moran wrote:
Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
FreeBSD r
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:03, Bill Moran wrote:
Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
FreeBSD related) so I was wondering if some Windows trojan is running
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:03, Bill Moran wrote:
> Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
>
> I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
> FreeBSD related) so I was wondering if some Windows trojan is running rampant
> and using thes
Just curious if anyone knows the origin of all these auto-responses, etc.
I'm seeing a lot of these on every list I'm subscribed to (not all of them
FreeBSD related) so I was wondering if some Windows trojan is running rampant
and using these list addresses as return addys?
Anyone know?
--
Bill M
->td_kstack = 0xdf13e000
td->td_kstack = 0xdf143000
td->td_kstack = 0xdf148000
...
Can someone please remove this spam?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:00:14PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Booting a new kernel I get:
>
> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
> cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0
> cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0
> io0 (APIC): apic id:
Generic Viagra is now available to consumers
As low as $2.25 per dose (50 mg)
No Doctor's Consutation required
"Silagra is as good as Viagra - just cheaper!"
Costs over 65% less than Brand Name
(Generic Sildenafil Citrate (Silagra)
and Viagra. both consist of 100 mg of
sildenafil citrate)
Priv
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:58:59AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> You know, whoever you are, you must lead a very sad, paranoid,
> sit-in-the-corner-the-world-is-out-to-get-me life if you think you
> are actually accomplishing something here. You are probably the
> same idiot who p
You know, whoever you are, you must lead a very sad, paranoid,
sit-in-the-corner-the-world-is-out-to-get-me life if you think you
are actually accomplishing something here. You are probably the
same idiot who posts all that anonymous-coward BSD-Is-Dying junk
to Slashdot. I wou
* mikem ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't think the effort is worth the reward. If the frequency
> increases, then the issue should be revisited.
>
> If we do decide this problem merits action...
How about filtering list messages through spamassassin? Anything that
matches can get bounced so
I meant anyone who is subscribed as a starting point,
and going forwards, anyone referenced in an email and not explicitly
NACK'd
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> On 22-Dec-2001 (22:23:24/GMT) aaron wrote:
>
> [...removed CC: because I suppose all subscribed this list...]
>
>
>
other simple solution (if we are using
mail filters) is to designate a group of people as spam watchers. When they
spot a spam they forward it to a special addres ( i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]),
which then includes it in some sort of filter recipe.
The disadvantage of such a scheme is that only subsequent
On 22-Dec-2001 (22:23:24/GMT) aaron wrote:
[...removed CC: because I suppose all subscribed this list...]
>> any address found in the archives is automatically subscribed
Any address found N times (where N >> reasonably high number, like
10, because we can not really assume that the archives a
sig - should not be such a problem.
Anyway
I would like to hear how others feel about that.
(*) I could imagine something like: there are n moderators and when the
mail arrives m (m << n) random moderators are forwarded the new mail.
It is sufficient if one of the m moderators accept
he people just 'forward
the mail to -current or -hackers if they think it's ok, and delete it if
it's spam or if they already saw it go through.. The act of forwarding
the mail will subscribe the sender.
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, aaron wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
> :coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
> :in through a freebsd.org mail server.
>
> Ha. In the last two we
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Julian Stacey wrote:
> > I can only hope that our illustrious congress has grown as tired of
> > spam as I have and will fix the law to simply ban it.
> > -Matt
>
> That would help, (most SPAM I re
> I can only hope that our illustrious congress has grown as tired of
> spam as I have and will fix the law to simply ban it.
> -Matt
That would help, (most SPAM I receive even in Germany is from USA), but
spammers would move offs
:I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
:coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
:in through a freebsd.org mail server.
Ha. In the last two weeks the amount of personal spam I receive has
gone up exponentiall
< said:
> Is this just a normal part of being on the list?
Yes, lots of spammers spew at FreeBSD mailing-lists. If you can
identify a persistent source of spam, the postmaster is fairly
responsive in filtering them.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Joe Halpin wrote:
>I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
>coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
>in through a freebsd.org mail server.
>Is this just a normal part of being on the li
I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
in through a freebsd.org mail server.
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) b
here's an idea..
why not have two addresses for the list.
the first would be the public address, and would be restricted to subscribers.
the second would be a non-published address, which would be unrestricted,
and would feed the published list via a side door.
only the first list would be ope
Chuck Robey writes:
> Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable
> approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn'
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable
> approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
>
> The could, but most wou
<
said:
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn't hold
> for those lists,
Yes they do.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
Chuck Robey scribbled this message on May 10:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
>
> The could, but most
> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Steven P. Donegan"
>
> I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM
> in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem?
>
that is an eloquent
>
> < said:
>
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> Yes, there are.
>
i forgot to mention that such a policy creates a single
"allowed" address per user...not good.
jmb
> -GAWollman
>
>
To Un
aining.
>
> Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> there difficulties that make this impossible?
yes...i have. that policy may be appropriate for some of the
lists, but it is certainly not appropriate for -questions, -newbies
and some others. a
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < said:
> >
> > > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > > there difficulties that make this impossible?
> >
> > Yes, there are.
>
> Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
> > addresses off the web page.
>
> It also stops perfectly legitimate users who are subscribed to a local
> mailing-list exploder, read the lists through Usenet, or for
gt; > post, or are there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> I suggest following approach: moderate only mail that lack the
> mailing list name in To: or Cc: headers. It is far from ideal,
> but I think would work reasonably well.
May I humbly suggest that we stop this dis
< said:
> Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
> addresses off the web page.
It also stops perfectly legitimate users who are subscribed to a local
mailing-list exploder, read the lists through Usenet, or for other
reasons are subscribed with a different address from
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
I think most won't bother. Probably a good number of them are
mailing automatically to a
> > "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> > > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> > > time-sequence of email would be lostwe would
I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM
in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
to get pretty fascist, but my false-positive is
very low (maybe 7 in total).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know how. It wouldn't be
a sure cu
this for all lists, but how about
just, say, current and committers? Hackers == maybe?
I don't think anyone on current or committers will complain.
>
> > the amount of spam we get is very little. its easy to delte a
> > couple messages. i do not believe it is worthwhile
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> Yes, there are.
Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
addresses off the web page. The su
< said:
> Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> there difficulties that make this impossible?
Yes, there are.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
Tom Veldhouse
ve...@visi.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Murray
To: Jonathan M. Bresler
Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, May 10, 1999 3:
we would get some very
> strange threads...could be enteraining.
Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
there difficulties that make this impossible?
> the amount of spam we get is very little. its easy to delte a
> couple messages. i do not believe i
> From: Seamus Wassman
> Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 20:31:00 -0700
>
> I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing list, I
> thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so that no garbage gets
> through, I personally find it quite offensiv
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Seamus Wassman wrote:
> I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing
> list, I thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so
> that no garbage gets through, I personally find it quite offensive
> to get SPAM on a help based mai
I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing list, I
thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so that no garbage gets
through, I personally find it quite offensive to get SPAM on a help based
mailing list, I have been thinking that maybe this list should
To all readers, who received spam concerning a 'noachidetorah' organization,
According to the copies of the message sent our way, the person who spammed
you sent regards from Mt. Zion, along with a list of about 10 web sites,
one of which was ours. The fellow is an embarrassment, but.
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> Amancio Hasty wrote...
> >
> > SGI is releasing GLX 8)
> >
> > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990216/ca_silicon_2.html
> >
> > Have Fun,
> > Amancio
> >
> > P.S.: If companies start dumping large packages is going to weight us down
> > :(
>
Amancio Hasty wrote...
>
> SGI is releasing GLX 8)
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990216/ca_silicon_2.html
>
> Have Fun,
> Amancio
>
> P.S.: If companies start dumping large packages is going to weight us down :(
Heh. That's pretty cool. Although I wouldn't say that GLX itself
SGI is releasing GLX 8)
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990216/ca_silicon_2.html
Have Fun,
Amancio
P.S.: If companies start dumping large packages is going to weight us down :(
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 07:36:35PM -0600, Jim Bryant wrote:
> This announcement is located on the Federal Trade Commission's
> complaint form page http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.htm
I've been using the address for over half a year.. Nada for response
nor spam reduction.
So I j
101 - 155 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
