On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:42:42PM +0400, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote:
> but /usr/bin and /usr/lib usualy live at the same filesystem and if
> /usr/lib may be broken, what we may say about /usr/bin?
Statically linked binaries in /usr/bin/ will still be usable. You didn't
think about what I said. Ta
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 09:00:34PM +0400, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote:
> > Why a lot of files in /usr/bin(sbin) are static linked?
> > for example, tar: static - 272832 bytes(83416 dynamic)
>
> IMO tar should live in /bin as it is used to restore a system
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 09:00:34PM +0400, Juriy Goloveshkin wrote:
> Why a lot of files in /usr/bin(sbin) are static linked?
> for example, tar: static - 272832 bytes(83416 dynamic)
IMO tar should live in /bin as it is used to restore a system from tape.
I don't know why ``dump'' is in /usr/sbin
Hi all!
Why a lot of files in /usr/bin(sbin) are static linked?
for example, tar: static - 272832 bytes(83416 dynamic)
is it magic of /usr/src/gnu folder?
Bye
Juriy Goloveshkin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
