On 2017-Mar-3, at 6:17 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>> On 2017-Mar-2, at 7:19 AM, Steve Kargl
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> Summary of the transition interval:
>
> On 2017-Mar-2, at 7:19 AM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> >>
> >>> Summary of the transition interval:
> >>>
> >>> So for powerpc64 (and powerpc?) It is a good
> >>>
On 2017-Mar-2, at 7:19 AM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> Summary of the transition interval:
>>>
>>> So for powerpc64 (and powerpc?) It is a good
>>> idea to avoid
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:10:21PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> >
> > Summary of the transition interval:
> >
> > So for powerpc64 (and powerpc?) It is a good
> > idea to avoid anything that is after -r313254
> > and before
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> On 2017-Feb-28, at 10:13 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:31:04PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> >>> Thus the PowerMac G5 so-called "Quad
On 2017-Feb-28, at 10:13 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:31:04PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> Thus the PowerMac G5 so-called "Quad Core" is back to
>>> -r313254 without your patches. (The "Quad Core" really
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:31:04PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> > Thus the PowerMac G5 so-called "Quad Core" is back to
> > -r313254 without your patches. (The "Quad Core" really has
> > two processors, each with 2 cores.)
> >
>
>
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 09:58:39AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> Thus the PowerMac G5 so-called "Quad Core" is back to
> -r313254 without your patches. (The "Quad Core" really has
> two processors, each with 2 cores.)
>
Thanks a lot for testing. I'll have to think what to do with it, worst
case
On 2017-Feb-25, at 5:49 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-25, at 1:05 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2017-Feb-24, at 11:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-Feb-24, at 8:25 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>
On 2017-Feb-24, at 4:23 PM,
On 2017-Feb-25, at 1:05 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-24, at 11:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2017-Feb-24, at 8:25 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-Feb-24, at 4:23 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Mark
On 2017-Feb-24, at 11:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-24, at 8:25 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2017-Feb-24, at 4:23 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
[Back to the powerpc64 context.]
On 2017-Feb-20, at
On 2017-Feb-24, at 8:25 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-24, at 4:23 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> [Back to the powerpc64 context.]
>>>
>>> On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017
On 2017-Feb-24, at 4:23 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> [Back to the powerpc64 context.]
>>
>> On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
[Note: I
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:37:25AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Back to the powerpc64 context.]
>
> On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> >> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64
[Back to the powerpc64 context.]
On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
>> reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
>> with this, as
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:39:32PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> Looks like some kernel binary interface (as seen by
> emulators/virtualbox-ose-addition ) has changed:
> rebuilding emulators/virtualbox-ose-addition removed
> the booting crash but uname -apKU still lists 1200021
> and 2100021 for
On 2017-Feb-20, at 6:36 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-20, at 3:35 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:10:44PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> On 2017-Feb-20, at 2:58 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>
On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On
On 2017-Feb-20, at 3:35 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:10:44PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2017-Feb-20, at 2:58 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 03:10:44PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-20, at 2:58 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> > On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> >>> [Note: I experiment with
On 2017-Feb-20, at 2:58 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
>>> reporting problems that I find. Justin is
On 2017-Feb-20, at 11:10 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
>> reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
>> with this, as is Nathan.]
>>
>> I tried to update the PowerMac G5
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 04:18:05AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
> reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
> with this, as is Nathan.]
>
> I tried to update the PowerMac G5 (a so-called "Quad Core")
> that I have access to from head
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:58:49PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-18, at 12:58 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > Well either the primitive itself is buggy or the somewhat (now) unusual
> > condition of not providing the failed value (but possibly a stale one)
> > is not handled correctly in
On 2017-Feb-18, at 12:58 PM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:49:29PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2017-Feb-18, at 4:18 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
>>> reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
>>> with
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:49:29PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2017-Feb-18, at 4:18 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> > [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
> > reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
> > with this, as is Nathan.]
> >
> > I tried to update the
On 2017-Feb-18, at 4:18 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
> reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
> with this, as is Nathan.]
>
> I tried to update the PowerMac G5 (a so-called "Quad Core")
> that I have access to from head -r312761 to
[Note: I experiment with clang based powerpc64 builds,
reporting problems that I find. Justin is familiar
with this, as is Nathan.]
I tried to update the PowerMac G5 (a so-called "Quad Core")
that I have access to from head -r312761 to -r313864 and
ended up with random panics and hang ups in
27 matches
Mail list logo