David Schultz's swapoff code has been comitted. It should be regarded
as being highly experimental (and it still needs to be vetted for
VM locking changes and other recent changes in -current). A considerable
amount of testing has been done already but -current is a moving target.
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:46:55AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> David Schultz's swapoff code has been comitted. It should be regarded
> as being highly experimental (and it still needs to be vetted for
> VM locking changes and other recent changes in -current). A considerable
>
:
:How about renaming swapon(8) into swapctl(8) after this function enhancemen=
:t?
:This name reflects it's purpose much better and would be consistent with the
:other BSDs.
:
:- Christian
I think that's an excellent idea. We would have to do some
rewriting to add the expected options bu
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:47:51PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :
> :How about renaming swapon(8) into swapctl(8) after this function enhancemen=
> :t?
> :This name reflects it's purpose much better and would be consistent with the
> :other BSDs.
> :
> :- Christian
>
> I think that's an exce
Thus spake Christian Brueffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How about renaming swapon(8) into swapctl(8) after this function enhancement?
> This name reflects it's purpose much better and would be consistent with the
> other BSDs.
It would be trivial to change the name, although I don't see what
it buys
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 02:47:51PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :
> :How about renaming swapon(8) into swapctl(8) after this function
> enhancemen=
> :t?
> :This name reflects it's purpose much better and would be consistent
> with the
> :other BSDs.
> :
> :- Christian
>
> I am not voluntee
:I have made a small patch, added l, s and h switches to show
:information about the swap devices. And the U switch to swapctl only
:to remove all activated swap devices.
:If anything else is needed let me know and I will add it.
:
:--=20
:
:Eirik Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:PGP Key: 83C55EDE
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 11:18:24AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :I have made a small patch, added l, s and h switches to show
> :information about the swap devices. And the U switch to swapctl only
> :to remove all activated swap devices.
> :If anything else is needed let me know and I will ad
:Added the enum instead of is_swap* commands and changed from kvm to
:sysctl to get the swap information.
:
:Eirik Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:PGP Key: 83C55EDE
All right, I found a couple more bugs and fleshed it out a bit.
You got your LINKS and MLINKS reversed and forgot a +=,
you
Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
-Matt
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/nc
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
> support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
I still dislike it. It starts by adding style bugs to the Makefile
(changing "=" to "+=" for the initial ass
Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
than I do anyway. :-)
The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
would make sense to rip support for -s out of pstat/swapinfo (and
integrate 'ps
:Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
:I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
:than I do anyway. :-)
:
:The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
:would make sense to rip support for -s out of pstat/swapinfo (and
:integ
:
:On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
:> support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
:
:I still dislike it. It starts by adding style bugs to the Makefile
:(changing "=" to "+=" for the i
Thus spake Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> :Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
> :I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
> :than I do anyway. :-)
> :
> :The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
> :would make sen
The swapctl code has been comitted. Bruce, you never supplied feedback
in regards to your original nits, but feel free to clean the code up
now that it has been comitted. All other bullets have been taken care
of.
I'm still on the fence in regards to backporting it. I would
[Reply to old mail]
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
> :I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
> :than I do anyway. :-)
> :
> :The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> The swapctl code has been comitted. Bruce, you never supplied feedback
> in regards to your original nits, but feel free to clean the code up
> now that it has been comitted. All other bullets have been taken care
> of.
I'm not sure i
18 matches
Mail list logo
