Re: very silent, but heavy filesystem-crash

2000-01-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:But as it comes out I had (in fact :( ) a typo in the disklabel. : :I checked the disklabel two times before my post to -current, but :I had obviously a little problem with my 'eye-brain-interlink'. : :I really shouldn't admit this in this forum, should I? ... But :in relabeling the disk I left

Re: very silent, but heavy filesystem-crash

2000-01-29 Thread Andreas Braukmann
Hi, ... thanks for your assistance. I On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 08:22:32AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > Next step is run the ``save'' fsck: > fsck -n /scratch >/someplacewithspace 2>&1 > > there is some illuminated filesystem-hacker who would like to > > take a peek. (I would allow ssh-acce

Re: very silent, but heavy filesystem-crash

2000-01-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi there, : : I reported a former heavy filesystem crash recently; have a look : at: : :http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=846852+849687+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-current/2123.freebsd-current : : I got it again. : Meanwhile my system got updated to : FreeBSD abc.xyz.de 4

Re: very silent, but heavy filesystem-crash

2000-01-28 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
... > > Starting an 'fsck' results in: > > cage:[/] # fsck /scratch > ** /dev/da1s1g > ** Last Mounted on /scratch > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=16 > SALVAGE? [yn] ^C > * FILE SYSTEM MARKED DIRTY * Next step is run the `

very silent, but heavy filesystem-crash

2000-01-28 Thread Andreas Braukmann
Hi there, I reported a former heavy filesystem crash recently; have a look at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=846852+849687+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-current/2123.freebsd-current I got it again. Meanwhile my system got updated to FreeBSD abc.xyz.de 4.0-CURRENT