Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000326 01:51] wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 01:15:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > I recently (tonight) I cvsup'd to 5.0 to play with Matt's SMP stuff > > and came across a problem where it seems that 5.0 doesn't get any > > IO down to my vinum st

Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >> >I'll get panics, >> >> You should know better than expect help providing only this little >> information... > >Poul, is your mailer broken in such a way that you can't quote the >entire message? If you had at least told me what panic y

Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:49:05AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Poul, is your mailer broken in such a way that you can't quote the > entire message? I doubt it. One should NOT quote entire messages, only the applicable parts. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000326 01:18] wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > >I'm about to wander down vinum's source again. > > > >With a kernel and vinum module dated approx Tue Feb 29 06:53:56 > >PST 2000 everything works fine. > > > >I recently (to

Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 01:15:07AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I'm about to wander down vinum's source again. > > With a kernel and vinum module dated approx Tue Feb 29 06:53:56 > PST 2000 everything works fine. > > I recently (tonight) I cvsup'd to 5.0 to play with Matt's SMP stuff > and c

Re: vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >I'm about to wander down vinum's source again. > >With a kernel and vinum module dated approx Tue Feb 29 06:53:56 >PST 2000 everything works fine. > >I recently (tonight) I cvsup'd to 5.0 to play with Matt's SMP stuff >and came across a pro

vinum possible casulty of B_* patches?

2000-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
I'm about to wander down vinum's source again. With a kernel and vinum module dated approx Tue Feb 29 06:53:56 PST 2000 everything works fine. I recently (tonight) I cvsup'd to 5.0 to play with Matt's SMP stuff and came across a problem where it seems that 5.0 doesn't get any IO down to my vinum