Re: web browsers

2002-09-05 Thread Dominic Mitchell
Garrett Wollman wrote: I'll stick with something that works, and works fast. I'm well aware of the security issues, and have determined the risk to be insignificant for the way I use a Web browser. (And frankly, I don't much care what lusing Web-design weenies think about it.) Well, that's

Re: web browsers

2002-09-05 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-Sep-2002 Dominic Mitchell wrote: Garrett Wollman wrote: I'll stick with something that works, and works fast. I'm well aware of the security issues, and have determined the risk to be insignificant for the way I use a Web browser. (And frankly, I don't much care what lusing

Re: web browsers

2002-09-05 Thread Emiel Kollof
* John Baldwin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Umm, developers are free to use whatever applications they want on their personal machines. The only thing that could possibly have any PR relation to web designers would be if we shipped an actual web browser in the base system that was offensive

web browsers (was: Re: aout support broken in gcc3)

2002-09-04 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mozilla, Galeon, and other browsers claim to be better, but often fail to provide features that have been in Netscape for forever. You mean features like being stable, at least sometimes? Efficiency? IMO, Mozilla has features up the kazoo, but the

Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support broken in gcc3)

2002-09-04 Thread Michael WARDLE
Mozilla, Galeon, and other browsers claim to be better, but often fail to provide features that have been in Netscape for forever. You mean features like being stable, at least sometimes? Efficiency? IMO, Mozilla has features up the kazoo, but the developers seem unwilling to pursue

Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support broken in gcc3)

2002-09-04 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Michael WARDLE [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The Gecko engine developed by the Mozilla Project, however seems to be very good. I find Galeon quite nice, as it uses Mozilla's quite capable HTML rendering engine, has its own well designed GTK-based GUI, and has little of Mozilla's bloat.

Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support broken in gcc3)

2002-09-04 Thread Terry Lambert
Michael WARDLE wrote: The Gecko engine developed by the Mozilla Project, however seems to be very good. I find Galeon quite nice, as it uses Mozilla's quite capable HTML rendering engine, has its own well designed GTK-based GUI, and has little of Mozilla's bloat. If it isn't broken, don't

Re: web browsers (was: Re: aout support broken in gcc3)

2002-09-04 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 16:54:02 +1000, Michael WARDLE [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: for Internet Explorer). I would suggest to anybody still using Netscape 4 on a Unix platform that they try a replacement browser, whether that be Mozilla, Galeon, or something else (perhaps Opera or Konqueror).

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-17 Thread Greg Black
David O'Brien wrote: | On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:05:13AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: | Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | What problems do you have with it? | | Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state | between sessions. Does not render HTML 4

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-17 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 09:56, Greg Black wrote: Joerg Wunsch wrote: | David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state | between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support | CSS properly. Does not zoom. Does

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-17 Thread Greg Black
Maxim Sobolev wrote: | On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 09:56, Greg Black wrote: | Yeah right. Galeon wouldn't even build on the last FreeBSD box | I tried it on when somebody told me to try it. | | It compiles/works here like a charm, however, if you do have problems | with it please send a problem

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-17 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Greg Black ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Joerg Wunsch wrote: Galeon. Yeah right. Galeon wouldn't even build on the last FreeBSD box I tried it on when somebody told me to try it. Tried Skipstone? Gecko based GTK browser. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:05:13AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What problems do you have with it? Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support CSS

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I use Opera 6. [...] Please try http://www.techiegold.com/ with Opera 6. No problem: http://www.ofug.org/~des/techiegold.png DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Rich Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about http://www.dice.com/jobsearch/index.html http://www.ofug.org/~des/dice.png (the error at the top is because my proxy blocks doubleclick) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-16 Thread Joerg Wunsch
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support CSS properly. Does not zoom. Does not display PNG properly. Incorrectly ignores cache-control headers on images. The

Re: web Browsers (Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT)

2002-03-16 Thread Greg Black
Joerg Wunsch wrote: | David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Slow. Eats memory. Crashes all the time. Does not save state | between sessions. Does not render HTML 4 properly. Does not support | CSS properly. Does not zoom. Does not display PNG properly. | Incorrectly ignores