Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:23:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality? > : It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now... > > I'm

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality? : It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now... I'm planning on doing that soonish. However, I think that hacking wi to make it

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > status: no carrier > : > ssid "" 1:"" > : > : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? > > I've found that the new driver really really rea

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > > It works! > Packets started flowing right after I typed in the above line. > > > > > and > > > > ifconfig wi0 192.168.254.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: Not sure whether I group replied, so maybe you will be receiving two similar sounding answers, Warner. > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Christoph P. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : Warner, I applied the patc

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Christoph P. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Warner, I applied the patch and no change. marcel's patch, or my patch? : How does one specify the commands in the ifconfig interface? : This is what I used to invoke from /etc/rc.local: : : /usr/sb

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > status: no carrier > : > ssid "" 1:"" > : > : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? As already said, I did that and the wicontrol output

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 03:18:49AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > > > I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current > > I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message > > is st

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > status: no carrier : > ssid "" 1:"" : : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old wicontrol interface when the commands are also present in the

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current > I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message > is still there (tx failed). The patch is unrelated to the tx failed message. >

wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message is still there (tx failed). I disabled all firewalling for the moment to have nothing in the way that might occlude the problem. The control lights at both