On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:23:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality?
> : It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now...
>
> I'm
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality?
: It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now...
I'm planning on doing that soonish. However, I think that hacking wi
to make it
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : > status: no carrier
> : > ssid "" 1:""
> :
> : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'?
>
> I've found that the new driver really really rea
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> It works!
> Packets started flowing right after I typed in the above line.
>
> >
> > and
> >
> > ifconfig wi0 192.168.254.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Not sure whether I group replied, so maybe you will be
receiving two similar sounding answers, Warner.
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Christoph P. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Warner, I applied the patc
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Christoph P. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Warner, I applied the patch and no change.
marcel's patch, or my patch?
: How does one specify the commands in the ifconfig interface?
: This is what I used to invoke from /etc/rc.local:
:
: /usr/sb
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : > status: no carrier
> : > ssid "" 1:""
> :
> : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'?
As already said, I did that and the wicontrol output
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 03:18:49AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> >
> > I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current
> > I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message
> > is st
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > status: no carrier
: > ssid "" 1:""
:
: Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'?
I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old
wicontrol interface when the commands are also present in the
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current
> I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message
> is still there (tx failed).
The patch is unrelated to the tx failed message.
>
I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current
I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message
is still there (tx failed).
I disabled all firewalling for the moment to have nothing in the way
that might occlude the problem.
The control lights at both
11 matches
Mail list logo