Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-06-24 12:56 +, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:33:05AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > I submitted some patches to use sendfile(2) that weren't accepted > > for some reason. It's not too hard, you just have to adjust the code > > not to close(2) the descriptors an

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:33:05AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > I submitted some patches to use sendfile(2) that weren't accepted > for some reason. It's not too hard, you just have to adjust the code > not to close(2) the descriptors and make the mmap() function a stub > type thing. > > rea

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020624 10:24] wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > Cool, thttpd / others should benefit greatly then. > > > > The last time I checked thttpd didn't even use sendfile(2). It does > > use accf_http(9). Mayb

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > Cool, thttpd / others should benefit greatly then. > > The last time I checked thttpd didn't even use sendfile(2). It does > use accf_http(9). Maybe kqueue(2) could speed it up further. > > -- > Andre I thought that thttpd

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Andre Oppermann
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > > > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > > > > MDT. If t

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > > > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than wi

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Kenneth D. Merry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > MDT. Great! DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it. > > Out of curiousity, what happens

Re: zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-23 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, > MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it. Out of curiousity, what happens when the page being write()n is a mmap'd page shared by multiple processe

zero copy code checkin in 2 days, new snapshot

2002-06-23 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening, MDT. If there are any concerns, I'm more than willing to delay it. I've also released a new snapshot, based on -current from June 23rd, 2002: http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/zero_copy/ The following changes went into this