David O'Brien wrote:
Here is a single patch vs. 5.x.
I believe this makes it actually work.
^
huh? This is untested?
Will you accept interoperability between two FreeBSD boxes? A
FreeBSD box and a NetBSD box?
Please apply this to the code, even if you are intent on
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:24:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
For heaven's sake! *It has only been 3 days* since the code
was threatened! What do you expect *in 3 days*!?!
The code has been broken for 7 years. You've
had ample time to fix and *maintain* this code.
Points moot, anyway.
Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:24:39PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
For heaven's sake! *It has only been 3 days* since the code
was threatened! What do you expect *in 3 days*!?!
The code has been broken for 7 years. You've
had ample time to fix and *maintain* this code.
=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?= wrote:
Guys;
I have to agree with Terry that the fixes for netns
should be committed, and furthermore they should be
MFC (using his first patch perhaps). It's a nightmare
to try to rescue anything from the Attic, at least it
would be nice to have it in
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 04:46 am, Bernd Walter wrote:
I've been having a reliable USB issue on my 5-current box (3 Mar,
23:58:25 MST). It's been happening since I upgraded to -current in the
DP2 days, and has happened on two completely independent motherboards.
On the more recent of the
After seeing the yet another Sony Vaio PS/2 mouse ID commits to
src/sys/isa/psm.c from six weeks ago, I've hacked my
src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c so now acpi_isa_pnp_probe() will try the
compatibility ID like isa_pnp_probe() does in src/sys/isa/isa_common.c.
It's quite trivial, so is there some
Mark Murray wrote:
Terry Lambert writes:
Mark Murray wrote:
Will it be runnable (as in tested), rather than a compile-only fix?
Is tested a requirement fo code to be committed or to have it
stay in the tree?
Both.
Cool. Then I have a long list of things that can be fixed
or
De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-03-05 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version ]
On the other hand, there's no compelling reason to dike it out,
if it can be made to work. I would argue that ISA support is
more or less just as obsolete, as is
M. Warner Losh wrote:
ISA support is not obsolete. All new PCs still have ISA busses. They
might not have ISA Expansion Bus Slots, but they all[*] still connect
their serial ports, parallel ports, and mouse/keyboard ports via ISA.
Not to mention i8254 which gets to be major pain if ACPI
Mark Murray wrote:
How long can this remain unfixed before the code is diked out,
and the checksum is recalculated fully, instead?
Terry, you sound rather foolish when you argue like this. This
is semantic tomfoolery and off topic. End of thread.
This is not a argument over mere
--- Chris Shenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I had absolutely no trouble booting and
installing 5.0-R on my 600SC, with the DELL-supplied
CERC
RAID card (amr device recognized it, but it drives
4x
ATA disks rather than SCSI), and an Intel gigabit
ether card. Got X11 working on it rather
John Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Dell PowerEdge]
What model? There are quite a few PowerEdges out
It's a 600SC - P4 1.8 - Perc3/SC
FWIW, I had absolutely no trouble booting and installing 5.0-R on my
600SC, with the DELL-supplied CERC RAID
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
