Re: setting CC/CXX/CPP unconditionally in src.conf

2012-02-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 28 12, Chuck Burns wrote: On 2/28/2012 4:55 PM, Ade Lovett wrote: On 2/28/2012 14:11, Alexander Best wrote: any chance we can have a CFLAGS.gcc and CFLAGS.clang in the future? that would make certain things a lot easier. dealing with gcc specific options, such as -mpreferred

installworld and delete-old fighting a constant battle

2012-03-14 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, while installing world with DESTDIR!=/ and running delete-old afterwards, i noticed the following entries. if i'm not mistaken delete-old should not need to delete anything, because DESTDIR was completely empty before running installworld: Removing old files (only deletes safe to

Re: howto debug a complete hard reset

2012-04-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Apr 14 12, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 08:59:42AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: This is probably a sysctl handler that is causing the reboot. You can run this one-liner to spot the culprit (use sh): for i in $(sysctl -Na); do sysctl $i ~/sysctl.out;

kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-09 Thread Alexander Best
and one for the second. as you can see the problem is that for some reason kldunloadf() returns zero, although it couldn't unload the module. cheers. alex - Forwarded message from Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org - Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 01:15:24 + From: Alexander Best arun

Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-09 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:46:12 am Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i posted this message on freebsd-questions@, but nobody could help me with it. to me this looks like a bug, so i assume posting it again here on freebsd-current@ might

Re: issue with options DDB

2010-11-09 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Nov 5 10, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sat, 30.10.2010 at 23:22:44 +, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, with options DDB in my kernel conf i run into the following issue with my kernel modules: link_elf_lookup_symbol: missing symbol hash table KLD file snd_hda.ko is missing

Re: issue with options DDB

2010-11-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 9 10, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:25:12PM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Nov 5 10, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sat, 30.10.2010 at 23:22:44 +, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, with options DDB in my kernel conf i run into the following

Re: issue with options DDB

2010-11-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:25:12PM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Nov 5 10, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sat, 30.10.2010 at 23:22:44 +, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, with options DDB

Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:10:28 am Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:46:12 am Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i posted this message on freebsd-questions@, but nobody could help

Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:10:28 am Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:46:12 am Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i posted

Re: issue with options DDB

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:25:12PM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Nov 5 10, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sat, 30.10.2010 at 23:22:44 +, Alexander Best wrote

Re: issue with options DDB

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 11 10, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 04:18:30PM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, Alexey Shuvaev wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:25:12PM +, Alexander Best

www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-12 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i'm having an issue with www/chromium. sometimes it will completely lock up my system without producing a core dump. i'm running HEAD (r215102; amd64). this time however chrome.core made it to disk somehow: Core was generated by `chrome'. Program terminated with signal 11,

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-13 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:37:15PM +, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i'm having an issue with www/chromium. sometimes it will completely lock up my system without producing a core dump. i'm running HEAD (r215102; amd64). Core dump

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-13 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:59:00AM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:37:15PM +, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i'm having an issue with www/chromium. sometimes

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-13 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:38:46PM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:59:00AM +, Alexander Best wrote: On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:37

libc_r removal?

2010-11-13 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, any reason to keep lib/libc_r still around? it has been detached from the build process on all supported branches (r162846; 4 years ago). cheers. alex -- a13x ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: 8-STABLE on -CURRENT with clang?

2010-11-13 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 13 10, Tim Kientzle wrote: Has anyone else tried make buildworld on an 8-STABLE checkout on a recent -CURRENT using clang? I'm seeing failures building GCC and was wondering if this was something messed-up locally and whether it was worth even trying to fix. can you check if

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Nov 13 10, Julian Elischer wrote: On 11/13/10 2:13 PM, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote: Isn't there also DEADLKRES that might be helpful in this case (if Alex is really dealing with a livelock in the kernel)...? The deadlock resolver is compiled

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-16 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 16 10, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:17:35 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 11/13/10 2:08 PM, Robert Watson wrote: If regular crashdumps appear unreliable, try setting up a textdump with an automatic reboot, that might provde more reliable (small chance, but

Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-16 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 10 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:07:21 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:10:28 am Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-16 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 16 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 16 10, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:17:35 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 11/13/10 2:08 PM, Robert Watson wrote: If regular crashdumps appear unreliable, try setting up a textdump with an automatic reboot

Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 17 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:20:12 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:07:21 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Nov 9 10, John Baldwin wrote

Re: kldunload(8) returns 0, although it fail

2010-11-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Nov 17 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 17 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:20:12 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:07:21 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Nov 10 10, Alexander Best wrote

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following: On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote: Just documenting regarding interactive performance things. This one's from Linux. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=linux_2637_videonum=1

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus: judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo. Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 18 10, Rob Farmer wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is nominally supposed to be the real content.  

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 16 10, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: On 15 Nov 2010, at 22:19, Alexander Best wrote: thanks for all your help. i've recently switched to chromium 6.0.472.63 and so far my computer has been very stable. if i experience more lock ups i'll let you know and try to figure out

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 18 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus: judging from

old references to vfs_mountroot_try()

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, vfs_mountroot_try() seems to have been removed, yet the src still contains three references to it: vfs_mount.c:386 vfs_mount.c:723 freebsd32_misc.c:2368 cheers. alex -- a13x ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard

Re: TTY task group scheduling

2010-11-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Nov 18 10, Julian Elischer wrote: On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaevkab...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 + Alexander Bestarun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu Nov 18

Re: old references to vfs_mountroot_try()

2010-11-19 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Nov 19 10, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 19 November 2010 02:14, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, vfs_mountroot_try() seems to have been removed, yet the src still contains three references to it: vfs_mount.c:386 vfs_mount.c:723 freebsd32_misc.c:2368 So

Re: www/chromium crashing whole system

2010-11-19 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 16 10, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: On 15 Nov 2010, at 22:19, Alexander Best wrote: thanks for all your help. i've recently switched to chromium 6.0.472.63 and so far my computer has been very stable. if i experience more lock ups i'll let you know and try to figure out

Re: old references to vfs_mountroot_try()

2010-11-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 23 10, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 19 November 2010 20:08, Marcel Moolenaar xcl...@mac.com wrote: On Nov 19, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 19 November 2010 02:14, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, vfs_mountroot_try() seems to have been

Re: Regarding pciids

2010-11-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Nov 23 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 18/10/2010 18:28 Alexander Best said the following: On Mon Oct 18 10, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Sep 17 10, Alex Dupre wrote: I created hackish scripts to generate pci_vendors file from Boemler and Mares (pciids.sf.net) lists. I haven't found

two issues with cdfs

2010-11-25 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i've tripped over two issues with the cdfs: 1) take a 4 GB example.file 2) do `mkisofs -iso-level 4 -input-charset ISO-8859-15 -V Test 1 -o new.iso example.file` 3) mdconfig -a -t vnode -f new.iso 4) mount -t cd9660 /dev/mdX /some/place the resulting file size is only 3115015779

Re: two issues with cdfs

2010-11-26 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Nov 26 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2010 00:25 Alexander Best said the following: hi there, i've tripped over two issues with the cdfs: What's cdfs? :-/ 1) take a 4 GB example.file 2) do `mkisofs -iso-level 4 -input-charset ISO-8859-15 -V Test 1 -o new.iso

Re: two issues with cdfs

2010-11-28 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Nov 26 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2010 21:08 Alexander Best said the following: On Fri Nov 26 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2010 00:25 Alexander Best said the following: hi there, i've tripped over two issues with the cdfs: What's cdfs? :-/ 1) take a 4 GB

Re: two issues with cdfs

2010-11-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Nov 28 10, Tim Kientzle wrote: On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Nov 26 10, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2010 00:25 Alexander Best said the following: 1) take a 4 GB example.file Likely we don't support multi-extent files at the moment. i found

a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-11 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also that any related executables and manual pages get removed if in fact that var is

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-12 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Dec 12 10, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 22:24:17 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: Alexander Best wrote: any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also that any related executables

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Dec 14 10, Bruce Cran wrote: On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:47:39 + b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote: The last part of your patch reverts a change that Warner Losh made in r212525 as part of his tbemd project merge. It's possible that this change may have been an unintended, but it

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Dec 14 10, b. f. wrote: Alexander Best wrote: any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also that any related executables

Re: a few OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc improvements

2010-12-17 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Dec 17 10, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Alexander Best wrote: [...] I'm glad to see that you're filling in some of the many missing bits in this file. yet another addition. cheers. alex .if ${MK_TCSH} == no And what about usr/share/skel/dot.cshrc? hmm...i'm not sure about

two ata write chaching request

2010-12-20 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i'd really like to see 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds (i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and 2) to be able to turn write chaching on and off on the fly. any thoughts on these two topics? is it technically possible? cheers. alex -- a13x

Re: two ata write chaching request

2010-12-20 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Dec 20 10, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 20, 2010, at 3:10 PM, Alexander Best wrote: 1) write caching to be turned on and off for individual hdds (i.e. hw.ata.X.wc) and 2) to be able to turn write chaching on and off on the fly. NetBSD's dkctl allows one to enable and disable read

Re: userland weirdness between r216351 and r216738

2010-12-31 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Dec 31 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:35:05 +0100 René Ladan r...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, somewhere between 9.0-amd64 r216351 and r216738, I've noticed some userland weirdness. Symptoms are: - pseudo-random number generator not starting, preventing ssh(d)

Re: userland weirdness between r216351 and r216738

2010-12-31 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Dec 31 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:35:05 +0100 René Ladan r...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, somewhere between 9.0-amd64 r216351 and r216738, I've noticed some userland weirdness. Symptoms are: - pseudo-random number generator not starting, preventing ssh(d)

Re: userland weirdness between r216351 and r216738

2011-01-01 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Jan 1 11, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 01:06:00 + Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: i tried adding the following to CFLAGS to prevent clang from using any SSE* instructions, but it seems that doesn't work: CFLAGS=-mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno

Re: Suddenly slow lstat syscalls on CURRENT from Juli

2011-01-01 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Jan 1 11, Beat Gätzi wrote: Hi, Since a couple of days commands like ls(1) are very slow on one of my tinderboxes. Checking with ktrace/kdump I see that the lstat syscall takes about one second: 70559 ls 0.004644 CALL lstat(0x284472f8,0x28447298) 70559 ls 0.004651

Re: cpufreq not working as module on i386/amd64

2011-01-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Jan 29 11, Jia-Shiun Li wrote: Hi all, I found that cpufreq driver failed to attach when compiled as module and loaded, but it works fine when compiled into kernel. I am wondering if this is due to some kind of limitation, or can be fixed? that's rather odd. for me neither the module

looking for a fast way to dump a dvd to a file on my hdd

2011-02-02 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i'd like to copy several dvds to my hdd. however my attempts so far haven't really been that successfull. basically using dd(1) is just way too slow. this is my dvd drive: cd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 cd0: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-H10N JL12 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0:

Re: looking for a fast way to dump a dvd to a file on my hdd

2011-02-02 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Feb 2 11, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Wed, 02.02.2011 at 12:04:58 -0800, Xin LI wrote: On 02/02/11 11:54, Alexander Best wrote: so far dd(1) with a bs=2048 finished after: 4676648960 bytes transferred in 1639.108763 secs (2853166 bytes/sec) Just curious - how

[RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-03 Thread Alexander Best
hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using are: for target=buildkernel: make SRCCONF=/dev/null

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Feb 3 11, Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-05 Thread Alexander Best
, Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-05 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes, which

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-06 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Feb 5 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:19:48 +, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote: hi everybody, i've started to check the source for broken includes

Re: [RFC] removing broken includes

2011-02-08 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 4 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote: alex, I think you are the kind of person to try out http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ with fbsd :) Please be careful with this tool though. There's

$PATH and buildworld not getting along

2011-02-15 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i've run into an issue where $PATH doesn't get discarded during buildworld. is this behavior to be expected? to reproduce do: 1) be sure /usr/local/bin comes *before* /usr/bin in your $PATH 2) ln -s /bin/cat /usr/local/bin/cc (some sh script would be better) 3) cd /usr/src ; make

Re: $PATH and buildworld not getting along

2011-02-18 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Feb 18 11, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Tue, 15.02.2011 at 21:10:29 +, Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i've run into an issue where $PATH doesn't get discarded during buildworld. is this behavior to be expected? to reproduce do: 1) be sure /usr/local/bin comes *before

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-22 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 February 2011 11:15, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:    I don't know what to say, but r218938 screams with flash videos (native Linux speed). Not sure if it's the new

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-22 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 February 2011 11:15, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-22 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 February 2011 11:15

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-22 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Eir Nym eir

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-22 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Eir Nym eir

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Feb 23 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:50:36 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-02-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Feb 23 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:50:36 pm Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue Feb 22 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2

Re: Can't update CLang-based system

2011-02-28 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Feb 28 11, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2011-02-28 04:30, Tim Kientzle wrote: I have a FreeBSD-CURRENT AMD64 system here that was last updated at r215029. I'm trying to update it to r219079, but the build fails in lib/libz when it tries to compile gvmat64.S. It looks like the Makefile

Re: [TESTING]: boot2 changes

2011-03-01 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Feb 28 11, Roman Divacky wrote: hi there, I have a patch that shrinks boot2 some: 1) it switches kname to be just a pointer instead of an array thus avoiding a couple of memcpy()s 2) it changes ioctl to unsigned from uint8_t 3) it changes the first keyhit limit to 5 seconds

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Mar 7 11, George Liaskos wrote: Hi, The following error occurs when i try to build r219385. cc -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/kerberos5/tools/make-roken/../../include -std=gnu99 -c make-roken.c make-roken.c:1: error: bad value (core2) for -march= switch

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Mar 7 11, George Liaskos wrote: What process did you follow to get here? I did a make toolchain followed by make buildworld. that's because the latest gcc commits have support for core2 and thus it no longer is being expanded to nocona. please note that having core2 in

Re: r219385 build error.

2011-03-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Mar 8 11, George Liaskos wrote: either native or nocona (actually native should evaluate to nocona): touch _native_test.c gcc -march=native -### _native_test.c should tell which -march and -mtune settings gcc assumes for native. indeed there are some known problems with

Re: [TESTING] ssse3 backport from gcc 4.3

2011-03-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Mar 10 11, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2011-03-09 22:18, David Schultz wrote: The proliferation of -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 options in the makefiles is probably not needed: I'm pretty sure -mno-sse implies the other two, unless -msse3 is specified explicitly. Indeed,

Re: [TESTING] ssse3 backport from gcc 4.3

2011-03-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Mar 9 11, George Liaskos wrote: I have prepared a patch that finishes the core2 support part and backports from gcc-4.3 the SSSE3 instruction set (-mssse3, -mno-ssse3). It is enabled for -march=core2 by default. Testing and comments are welcome. Patch:

Re: [TESTING] base gcc update to latest GPLv2 version

2011-03-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Mar 10 11, Martin Matuska wrote: Here is a base gcc upgrade to the latest GPLv2 version (rev. 127959). http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/head-gcc-422-prerelease.patch Open questions: Do we want the 4.2.2 prerelase 20070831 version tag or stick to 4.2.1 20070831? i'd prefer

Re: [TESTING] ssse3 backport from gcc 4.3

2011-03-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Mar 10 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Thu Mar 10 11, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2011-03-09 22:18, David Schultz wrote: The proliferation of -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 options in the makefiles is probably not needed: I'm pretty sure -mno-sse implies the other two, unless -msse3

status of WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL

2011-03-10 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, just wanted to ask what the current situation on WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL is? it seems the option gets completely ignored after a recent commit. should src.conf be adjusted to mention that WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL == noop or should the option be completely removed? also in usr.sbin/Makefile, the

Re: WITHOUT_JAIL and make delete-old{,-libs}

2011-03-20 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Mar 20 11, David Demelier wrote: Hello, I was surprised to see there is no ${MK_JAIL} conditional to remove old files on 8.2-RELEASE so I started to write it without watching if -CURRENT already make it in /usr/src/tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc. i think it's best to

Re: Getting /usr/src/ from SVN directly?

2011-03-26 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Mar 25 11, Artem Belevich wrote: --Artem On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Nerius Landys nlan...@gmail.com wrote: Use devel/subversion-freebsd though so it expands the $FreeBSD$ RCS tag. I just did that.  I am afraid however that all of my files in /etc will have a different

Re: Getting /usr/src/ from SVN directly?

2011-03-26 Thread Alexander Best
On Sat Mar 26 11, Nerius Landys wrote: one could also use the -F switch in connection with mergemaster(8). From mergemaster manpage: If the files differ only by VCS Id ($FreeBSD) install the new file. Yes that is exactly what I want, thanks. np. By the way, are there any other ways

Re: detection os arch

2011-03-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Mar 28 11, Veniamin Gvozdikov wrote: Hi everybody. I have question about packages. Why packages don't supported detection os arch? i think freebsd-questions@ is better suited for that question. -- a13x ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-03-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Mar 30 11, Buganini wrote: Could this help? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680279 On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:    Also, it looks like npviewer.bin still hangs to resources on until Firefox closes (or I kill it :)..), so

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-03-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Tue Mar 29 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 29 March 2011 05:35 pm, Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Mar 30 11, Buganini wrote: Could this help? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680279 On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-03-29 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Mar 30 11, Alexander Best wrote: On Tue Mar 29 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 29 March 2011 05:35 pm, Alexander Best wrote: On Wed Mar 30 11, Buganini wrote: Could this help? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680279 On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-03-30 Thread Alexander Best
On Wed Mar 30 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 March 2011 12:50 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 March 2011 12:46 am, Buganini wrote: It seems work well now, no lockup when I went through pages. but I still got lockup when I right-click on some flash advertisement. for

Re: Wow... (-- blown away at performance)

2011-03-31 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Mar 31 11, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:58 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote: I wrote an ugly but very simple workaround. Drop the attached patch in www/nspluginwrapper-devel/files and replaces old one, rebuild, reinstall, redo plugin wrappers, etc., etc... I just went

multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-03-31 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in devicestat.h: /* * These types are intended to aid statistics gathering/display programs. * The first 13 types (up to the 'target' flag) are identical numerically * to the SCSI device type numbers. The next 3

Re: issue with devstat_buildmatch(3) and certain strings

2011-04-01 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Apr 1 11, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 1 April 2011 01:03, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, devstat_buildmatch(3) crashes with certain strings. you can test this by doing one of: iostat -t , iostat -t ,, iostat -t da, iostat -t ,da, iostat -t ,da

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: hi there, i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in devicestat.h: /* * These types are intended to aid statistics gathering/display programs

[RFC] adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS

2011-04-07 Thread Alexander Best
hi there, i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let tinderbox fail, if any new kernel code was committed with (a) broken include dir(s). i ran a test via make toolchains make MAKE_JUST_KERNELS=yes tinderbox and nothing seemed to go wrong with the extra

Re: [RFC] adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS

2011-04-07 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: hi there, i'd like to propose adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS. this will let

Re: [RFC] adding -Wmissing-include-dirs to CWARNFLAGS

2011-04-08 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Apr 7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu Apr  7 11, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alexander Best arun

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in devicestat.h: ... funny thing is i found

<    1   2   3   4   >