https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226713
Alan Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org |asom...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
Bug ID: 226714
Summary: zfsboot(8) erroneously suggests creating a BSD label
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
Eugene Grosbein changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226554
Maxim Konovalov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #2 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #1)
> Easiest fix would be to replace "dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ada0s1 count=1"
> with "dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ada0s1 count=2" in the docs to make
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226785
Bug ID: 226785
Summary: Porter's Handbook, 6.6 Using GNU Autotools needs to
discuss USES= autoreconf
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217884
Bryan Drewery changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bdrew...@freebsd.org|freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
--
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226785
--- Comment #1 from free...@dreamchaser.org ---
As it turns out, section 6.6 needs to be completely reworked, as the use of
USE_AUTOTOOLS is no longer allowed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226835
Bug ID: 226835
Summary: Invalid string comparison operator in example 7.2 of
the Porter's Handbook
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226500
Gabor Kovesdan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226500
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: gabor
Date: Thu Mar 22 10:25:41 UTC 2018
New revision: 51511
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/51511
Log:
- Fix phone number
PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226835
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: linimon
Date: Fri Mar 23 08:17:12 UTC 2018
New revision: 51513
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/51513
Log:
Fix trivial typo.
PR:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226835
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org |lini...@freebsd.org
Sta
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226874
Bug ID: 226874
Summary: Add vendor on website
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226875
Bug ID: 226875
Summary: Add hardware Vendor
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #3 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
It also seems that the requirement to set "sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=0x10" is
superfluous, dd'ing the bootcode onto the VBR works fine without it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226908
Bug ID: 226908
Summary: Duplicate entries in src.conf man page
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Af
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226921
Bug ID: 226921
Summary: Remove SOURCEFORGE_JP from Table 5.3. of FreeBSD
Porter's Handbook
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: An
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #4 from Andriy Gapon ---
(In reply to vas from comment #0)
I am not sure why the first wiki link is marked as "does not boot". The
instructions look sane, but maybe there is a mistake in them. Someone needs to
follow them exac
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217489
--- Comment #5 from s...@mostnet.ru ---
Created attachment 191867
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=191867&action=edit
patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217489
--- Comment #6 from s...@mostnet.ru ---
patch attached, sorry for long delay
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
Bernard Spil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||br...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
--- Comment #9 from Bernard Spil ---
And references to /etc/make.conf in handbook too
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
--- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: gahr
Date: Tue Mar 27 14:24:26 UTC 2018
New revision: 465706
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/465706
Log:
lang/tcl85, lang/tcl86: remov
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
--- Comment #11 from Mathieu Arnold ---
Note that like the warning says, using WITH_opt / WITHOUT_opt is not supported.
It WILL NOT DO ANYTHING.
Especially, it will not enable or disable an option.
So the update to tcl was unwarranted.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
--- Comment #12 from Pietro Cerutti ---
Well, I have been kind of willing to remove this option anyway - if you look at
the alpha lang/tcl87, it doesn't have it. I think this bug popped up just at
the right moment to make me decide to event
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: eugen
Date: Tue Mar 27 17:37:08 UTC 2018
New revision: 331630
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331630
Log:
Fix instructions in the zfsboo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #6 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to commit-hook from comment #5)
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ada0s1 count=2
I find it inappropriate. You never explain the meaning of this hack, it will
look enigmatic for the uninitiated
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #7 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Andriy Gapon from comment #4)
> Someone needs to follow them exactly and to check what happens
Both the wiki links have multiple issues. If I were given the power, I would
merge them
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #8 from Mark Linimon ---
(In reply to vas from comment #7)
I am willing to help get the information into the wiki. Please email linimon@
if you are interested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #9 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #6)
This "installation procedure" is inappropriate as a whole and should be not
explained but thrown away completely and replaced with something like new
command "zpool
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #10 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #7)
The problem is not in zfsboot (it works just fine despite of BSD label
presense), it is in the libstand/libsa linked to zfsloader(8).
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #11 from Warner Losh ---
Explain the bug in libsa, and I'll fix the bug in libsa.
I agree, we shouldn't work around a bug that's easily fixed, or make snarky
comments about parts of the system that clearly have an active mainta
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #12 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Warner Losh from comment #11)
Please look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714#c1 for
details.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #13 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #9)
> zpool bootcfg
Is that a good idea? I would think it would be more appropriate for "gpart
bootcode"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #14 from Warner Losh ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #12)
So I'm not so sure that's the bug.
The bug appears to be here:
pa.fd = open(devname, O_RDONLY);
if (pa.fd == -1)
return (
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #15 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Warner Losh from comment #14)
> So I'm not so sure that's the bug.
I do not insist that's the bug, a mis-feature may be :-)
> So if we can't open the s1 device (which we prohibit curr
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #16 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Warner Losh from comment #14)
> ptable_open should recurse properly though
There is nothing to recurse in the scenario described above.
Either zfsboot installation procedure must clea
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #17 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #13)
ZFS won't allow GEOM to open its pool for writing unless the pool is exported
and export is not possible for mounted boot/root pool. Only ZFS itself may
update zfs
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #18 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to Warner Losh from comment #14)
> Oh, and I agree we should stop telling people to create a BSD partition, but
> we should support it because sometimes it's necessary for a swap or a dum
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #19 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #17)
I cannot imagine a scenario in which you have to install/update zfsboot on the
running system, over a mounted root pool. If it is a new installation,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #20 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #18)
> I do not see large demand for ZFS-inside-BSDlabel-inside-MBRslice
> configuration but simplier ZFS-inside-MBRslice should be just fine.
Hear, hea
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #21 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #19)
ZFS boot blocks get updated periodically to support new zpool-features(7). For
example, booting from pools utilizing "skein" hash algotithm has not been
supported
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #22 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #20)
> Hear, hear! The sooner bsdlabel is forgotten the better.
No need to be extreme: modern BSD label capable of holding upto 20 partitions
is still just fine for MB
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #23 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #21)
Sounds scary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-doc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #24 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #21)
All this scary stuff (boot sectors, boot records) will probably go for good
when GPT+UEFI becomes more ubiquitous.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #25 from Warner Losh ---
Leaving vestiges of a bsdlabel around is asking for trouble. What I'm worried
about is that we don't actually handle the nesting case in general. Also, if
the bsdlabel looks valid, the boot blocks have t
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227050
Bug ID: 227050
Summary: Handbook Does Not Recommend Using Label for
Installation Partition
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: amd64
OS:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159099
Brooks Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|kern|Documentation
Summary|[i
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227099
Bug ID: 227099
Summary: [handbook] 28.10 refers to net/samba-smbclient port;
does not exist
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: A
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227099
James changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://www.freebsd.org/doc
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
Bernard Spil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zarych...@plan-b.pwste.edu.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227123
Bug ID: 227123
Summary: Broken link to chapter 17 in Porter's Handbook
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Seve
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192663
Karl Sundström changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rootvg@unix.pizza
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227174
Bug ID: 227174
Summary: No wlanstats man page
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227185
Bug ID: 227185
Summary: write(2) blocksize behaviour on raw devices should be
added to manpage
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227197
Bug ID: 227197
Summary: Binary IT has specialized in Managed IT Services
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Se
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227197
--- Comment #1 from Binay Binary ---
take this one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/m
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227211
Bug ID: 227211
Summary: sensite files discloser
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: arm
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Many Peop
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227211
akku.adlak...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://ftp2.za.freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227211
Allan Jude changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allanj...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227251
Bug ID: 227251
Summary: Typo in chapter 17.85. uniquefiles of Porter's
Handbook
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
URL: https://www.f
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #26 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: eugen
Date: Tue Apr 3 14:05:40 UTC 2018
New revision: 331927
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331927
Log:
MFC r331630: Fix instructions
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #27 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
I think those two Wiki pages mentioned in the problem description should be
merged and rewritten. If anybody can review my attempt at rewriting them,
please look at
https://bitbucket.org/victor_su
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #28 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #27)
"Setting the active slice is not strictly necessary" is wrong because there are
BIOS'es that won't even try to load Boot Manager from a disk having no active
slice
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #29 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #28)
A valid point, thank you, I've corrected the document.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #30 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
Still updating the article at
https://bitbucket.org/victor_sudakov/faq/src/tip/FreeBSD/Installing_FreeBSD_Root_on_ZFS_using_FreeBSD-ZFS_partition_in_a_FreeBSD_MBR_Slice.txt
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #31 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #30)
> Setting the active slice is not strictly necessary, the Boot Manager
> will do it for you anyway.
>
> However there are BIOSes that won't even try to load the Bo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #32 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
(In reply to Eugene Grosbein from comment #31)
> I suggest removing both paragraphs completely
> as they discuss something unrelated to ZFS and FreeBSD.
Noted but declined for the present. I pref
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #33 from Eugene Grosbein ---
(In reply to vas from comment #32)
But labeling active slice is pretty obvious... And BootEasy is not sole boot
manager for FreeBSD (/boot/mbr is preferable for single-boot). In fact, there
is no re
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226714
--- Comment #34 from v...@mpeks.tomsk.su ---
The question is who has the power to edit the FreeBSD Wiki and what chance of
getting there my article has.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=153012
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Documentation |Manual Pages
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225441
--- Comment #5 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: gonzo
Date: Mon Apr 9 05:43:30 UTC 2018
New revision: 332316
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332316
Log:
MFC r328434 by maxim:
o A c
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225441
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207389
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |go...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227197
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||go...@freebsd.org
R
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168962
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org
C
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227397
Bug ID: 227397
Summary: [NEW BSD GROUP]
Product: Documentation
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227397
Martin Filla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[NEW BSD GROUP] |New bsd group in Prague,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227406
Bug ID: 227406
Summary: man zfs describes effect of some flags on
solaris/classic unix, need correcting for differences
on import to FreeBSD
Product: Documentation
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227406
Stilez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|man zfs describes effect of |man zfs need correcting on
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227406
--- Comment #1 from Stilez ---
clarification to OP, 3rd para, "the setuid bit acts on files and dirs if the
file system supports it" is referencing the chmod 4000 bit, not the zfs
property of the same name. The issue is that zfs only suppor
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184758
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |b...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226251
Mathieu Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |m...@freebsd.org
--
You are rec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226921
Mathieu Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |m...@freebsd.org
--
You are rec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227251
Mathieu Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |m...@freebsd.org
--
You are rec
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226785
Mathieu Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
St
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226382
--- Comment #3 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: mat
Date: Thu Apr 12 07:34:46 UTC 2018
New revision: 51550
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/51550
Log:
Add a note about WITH_DEBUG wrt str
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226382
Mathieu Arnold changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Closed
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Documentation |Manual Pages
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216755
--- Comment #1 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: gonzo
Date: Thu Apr 12 17:05:28 UTC 2018
New revision: 332439
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332439
Log:
Fix quotes in the example code
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24786
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org
Co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26003
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org
Co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83820
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Documentation |Manual Pages
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100803
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Documentation |Manual Pages
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40423
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|d...@freebsd.org |b...@freebsd.org
C
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221477
Oleksandr Tymoshenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Documentation |Manual Pages
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40423
--- Comment #5 from Oleksandr Tymoshenko ---
The content of attachment 192474 has been deleted for the following reason:
Attached to wrong bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
1501 - 1600 of 12862 matches
Mail list logo
