VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Tim Gustafson
Is there any effort under way to port VirtualBox 4.x to FreeBSD, now that the whole thing is open source? Tim Gustafson Baskin School of Engineering UC Santa Cruz t...@soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Is there any effort under way to port VirtualBox 4.x to FreeBSD, now that the > whole thing is open source? > > Tim Gustafson > Baskin School of Engineering > UC Santa Cruz > t...@soe.ucsc.edu > 831-459-5354 > There is a port available for

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Eitan Adler
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote: > Is there any effort under way to port VirtualBox 4.x to FreeBSD, now that the > whole thing is open source? http://www.freebsdnews.net/2011/02/19/virtualbox-4-0-4-for-freebsd-cft/ -- Eitan Adler __

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Tim Gustafson
> There is a port available for testing: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-February/065983.html > > Note that there may be a newer version available than the link > included in the original CFT e-mail... Awesome, thanks! I'll have to get that compiled and tested later th

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Rusty Nejdl
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim Gustafson wrote: >> There is a port available for testing: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-February/065983.html [1] Note that there may be a newer version available than the link included in the original CFT e-mail... > Aweso

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:30:02 -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: Can I ask what we are waiting for to commit this to the ports tree? This new version is a HUGE improvement, at least as I have seen. At home I can't install Windows 7 in a VM because it crashes in the installer and terminates the VM e

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:30:02 -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: > Can I ask what we are waiting for to commit this to the ports > tree? This new version is a HUGE improvement, at least as I have seen. Because it's not stable enough yet. There have been some serious bugreports from the CFT and i've collecte

Re: VirtualBox 4.x

2011-03-22 Thread Rusty Nejdl
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:52:17 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:30:02 -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: >> Can I ask what we are waiting for to commit this to the ports tree? This new version is a HUGE improvement, at least as I have seen. > Because it's not stable enough yet.

Re: ports/155874: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable

2011-03-22 Thread edwin
Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 22 22:20:14 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/

[Fwd: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.2r152_1 failed on amd64 8]

2011-03-22 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Přeposlaná zpráva > Od: User Ports-amd64 > Komu: c...@oook.cz, ite...@freebsd.org, lini...@freebsd.org > Předmět: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.2r152_1 failed on amd64 8 > Datum: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:34:30 GMT > > You can also find this build log at > > > http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.