Is there any effort under way to port VirtualBox 4.x to FreeBSD, now that the
whole thing is open source?
Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
___
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> Is there any effort under way to port VirtualBox 4.x to FreeBSD, now that the
> whole thing is open source?
>
> Tim Gustafson
> Baskin School of Engineering
> UC Santa Cruz
> t...@soe.ucsc.edu
> 831-459-5354
>
There is a port available for
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> Is there any effort under way to port VirtualBox 4.x to FreeBSD, now that the
> whole thing is open source?
http://www.freebsdnews.net/2011/02/19/virtualbox-4-0-4-for-freebsd-cft/
--
Eitan Adler
__
> There is a port available for testing:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-February/065983.html
>
> Note that there may be a newer version available than the link
> included in the original CFT e-mail...
Awesome, thanks!
I'll have to get that compiled and tested later th
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim Gustafson wrote:
>>
There is a port available for testing:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-February/065983.html
[1] Note that there may be a newer version available than the link
included in the original CFT e-mail...
> Aweso
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:30:02 -0500, Rusty Nejdl
wrote:
Can I ask what we are waiting for to commit this to the ports
tree? This new version is a HUGE improvement, at least as I have seen.
At home I can't install Windows 7 in a VM because it crashes in the
installer and terminates the VM e
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:30:02 -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote:
> Can I ask what we are waiting for to commit this to the ports
> tree? This new version is a HUGE improvement, at least as I have seen.
Because it's not stable enough yet. There have been some serious
bugreports from the CFT and i've collecte
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:52:17 +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:30:02 -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote:
>> Can I ask what
we are waiting for to commit this to the ports tree? This new version is
a HUGE improvement, at least as I have seen.
> Because it's not stable
enough yet.
Synopsis: www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 is vulnerable
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->emulation
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 22 22:20:14 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
http://www.freebsd.org/
Přeposlaná zpráva
> Od: User Ports-amd64
> Komu: c...@oook.cz, ite...@freebsd.org, lini...@freebsd.org
> Předmět: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.2r152_1 failed on amd64 8
> Datum: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:34:30 GMT
>
> You can also find this build log at
>
>
> http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.
10 matches
Mail list logo