Re: Killing the vbox alias, or making it something different

2021-06-23 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:40:37PM -0500, lini...@portsmon.org lini...@portsmon.org wrote: > > On 06/22/2021 10:58 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > I can't find a valid reason to have a vbox alias to emulation@ why > > not make emulation@ the maintainer of the vbox software dir

Killing the vbox alias, or making it something different

2021-06-22 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hello everyone, one thing that we are doing during the migration is making it mandatory for the mailing list to be either in CC or in the To, which means aliases to a mailing list will not work anymore. As of right now all email to vbox@ are bring rejected. In anycase, I can't find a valid

Re: emulators/virtualbox-ose can't work when switching to gcc46

2013-09-13 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:33:57PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: Hello. Just a tiny background. I'm just experimenting with getting rid of in-base gcc and using compiler from ports whenever possible. And gcc46 produces much better code then our gcc42. When I change USE_GCC to yes

Re: Current problem reports assigned to emulat...@freebsd.org

2012-11-06 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:32:39PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: On 5 November 2012 10:28, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru wrote: Can I politely ask for emulation@ to give up maintainership for this port? Nobody here keeps this port updated and when patches are submitted nobody commits them.