Re: SVN r296272 breaks virtualbox

2016-03-02 Thread John Baldwin
ink ripping the band-aid off is fine, especially since the replacement API has been ready for such a long time (and goes back to 7.0). -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: SVN r296272 breaks virtualbox

2016-03-02 Thread John Baldwin
700013, so you can use that version. OTOH, I would be surprised if VirtualBox worked on FreeBSD 6.x. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: SVN r296272 breaks virtualbox

2016-03-01 Thread John Baldwin
gt; > > > Michael > > > > > +1 Then the port needs to be patched? It's been using an API deprecated for the last 15 years. A simple s/taskqueue_enqueue_fast/taskqueue_enqueue/ will fix it. -- John Baldwin ___ freeb

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

2014-04-30 Thread John Baldwin
The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:34:28 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

2014-04-30 Thread John Baldwin
The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:17:18 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

2014-04-30 Thread John Baldwin
The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:09:44 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

2014-04-29 Thread John Baldwin
The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:43:16 -0400 On

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

2014-04-28 Thread John Baldwin
The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: Steven Spence Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:32:23 -0400 This

Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot

2014-04-21 Thread John Baldwin
The following reply was made to PR kern/186051; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, free...@stratum16.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/186051: [vmware] [panic] FreeBSD 8.4+, 9.x+, 10.0 guest panic with VMWare Server on boot Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:37:41

Re: [PATCH] Move MI bits out of MD linux.h

2013-01-28 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, January 28, 2013 12:49:44 pm Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 09:47:39AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > This patch attempts to reduce duplication between i386/linux/linux.h and > > amd64/linux32/linux.h by moving bits that are MI out into headers in >

[PATCH] Move MI bits out of MD linux.h

2013-01-28 Thread John Baldwin
reduction could be possible if we wanted to make a linux-i386.h that these two headers could share, but that would be a separate project. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/linux_mi.patch -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [PATCH] Properly handle Linux TCP socket options

2013-01-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, January 21, 2013 2:55:22 pm Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:26:13 -0500 John Baldwin wrote: > > > The current setsockopt() wrapper for the Linux ABI claims that Linux > > and FreeBSD use the same values for TCP socket options. This is true >

[PATCH] Properly handle Linux TCP socket options

2013-01-19 Thread John Baldwin
MAXSEG2 +#defineLINUX_TCP_KEEPIDLE 4 +#defineLINUX_TCP_KEEPINTVL 5 +#defineLINUX_TCP_KEEPCNT 6 +#defineLINUX_TCP_MD5SIG14 + struct l_sockaddr { l_ushortsa_family; char sa_data

Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/desktop chapter.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu chapter.sgml

2011-12-13 Thread John Baldwin
icy. I do think the installer can set a good initial policy for this just as it can for /home. Now, using the default layout the installer could just leave /compat as a dir on /. Many folks still customize their layout to make /usr or /home separa

Add fadvise(2) to the Linux ABI

2011-11-14 Thread John Baldwin
This patch teaches the Linux ABIs to use the new posix_fadvise(2) system calls instead of using stubs. I've no good way to test this so would appreciate some extra review or testing. Patch is at http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/fadvise_linux.patch -- John Ba

Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures

2011-10-24 Thread John Baldwin
Fixing this problem generically is very hard. Instead, we have patched individual sysctls and ioctls on a case-by-case basis. I do think newer interfaces often opt to use fixed-size types so that the structure is the same for both 32-bit and 64-bit, but that will not work for existing interfaces

Re: Request for review/comments: 32-bit compat for non-x86 architectures

2010-03-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 10:55:40 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 March 2010 9:39:15 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > >> John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >>> On Tuesday 09 March 2010 11:14:27 pm Nathan Whitehorn

Re: Request for review/comments: 32-bit compat for non-x86 architectures

2010-03-10 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 9:39:15 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 March 2010 11:14:27 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > >> The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/compat_freebsd32.diff > >> (pre-generated freebsd32

Re: Request for review/comments: 32-bit compat for non-x86 architectures

2010-03-10 Thread John Baldwin
s are for, but fixing ia32_reg.h would be a good first step. It would make your diffs smaller I think. The rest of the diff looks fine to me. -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"