Op 14 jan. 2017 09:49 schreef "Frank Baro" :
Hello !
That happens yesterday :
# portmaster -da
Installing linux_base-c6-6.8_7...
pkg-static: Fail to set time on /compat/linux/proc: Operation not supported
*** Error code 70
Stop.
Quick check, is /compat/linux/proc mounted , it should show IP i
On 21-06-16 14:15, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:08:56 GMT pkg-fall...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain
>> is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server.
>> Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix
>> build.
>>
>>
[leaving out questions@ ]
2016-04-07 16:04 GMT+02:00 Vikash Badal :
> Greetings
>
> can anyone assist ?
>
> I am trying to build the following ports using x11/nvidia-driver-340
> instead of x11-nvidia-driver :
> emulators/linux-c6
> x11-toolkits/linux-c6-qt47-x11
> graphics/linux-c6-glx-utils
> ne
2016-02-25 23:39 GMT+01:00 René Ladan :
>
> Op 25 feb. 2016 5:30 p.m. schreef "René Ladan" :
>>
>> 2016-02-25 16:25 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
>> > René Ladan writes:
>> >> I patched stable/9, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5418
>&g
Op 25 feb. 2016 5:30 p.m. schreef "René Ladan" :
>
> 2016-02-25 16:25 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> > René Ladan writes:
> >> I patched stable/9, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5418
> >
> > You need to bump __FreeBSD_version in sys/sys/param
2016-02-25 16:25 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> René Ladan writes:
>> I patched stable/9, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5418
>
> You need to bump __FreeBSD_version in sys/sys/param.h.
>
Ah, I will do that.
René
___
freebsd-emu
2016-02-25 16:14 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> René Ladan writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
>> > In that case, I suggest issuing an EN to bump compat.linux.osrelease
>> > and retiring the f10 ports.
>> What is the best way to prepare an EN? Patching sta
2016-02-23 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> René Ladan writes:
>> Johannes Jost Meixner writes:
>> > [linux-c6 works on 9] with the compat.linux.osrelease sysctl bumped
>> > to 2.6.32
>> Indeed, see the screenshot at [1] where I'm running linux-opera
2016-02-23 11:30 GMT+01:00 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> René Ladan writes:
>> Johannes Jost Meixner writes:
>> > [linux-c6 works on 9] with the compat.linux.osrelease sysctl bumped
>> > to 2.6.32
>> Indeed, see the screenshot at [1] where I'm running linux-opera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/22/16 05:12 PM, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
>
>
> On 02/21/16 06:37 PM, René Ladan wrote:
>
> > Op 21 feb. 2016 17:33 schreef "Chagin Dmitry" > <mailto:dcha...@freebsd.org>>:
> >>
> >
Op 21 feb. 2016 17:33 schreef "Chagin Dmitry" :
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 04:48:12PM +0100, Ren?? Ladan wrote:
> > 2016-02-20 23:36 GMT+01:00 Chagin Dmitry :
> > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:27:12PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > >> Ren?? Ladan writes:
> > >> > in light of CVE-2015-7547
2016-02-20 23:36 GMT+01:00 Chagin Dmitry :
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:27:12PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
>> Ren?? Ladan writes:
>> > in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security vulnerabilities,
>> > is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* ports?
>>
>> I don't think we can ju
2016-02-18 20:58 GMT+01:00 Johannes Jost Meixner :
>
> Fedora 10 has been EoL'd by the Fedora project on 2009-12-17 [1] and
> thus has not been receiving any security updates during more than six
> (!) years.
>
> As a result of this, many of the ports that form the basis for the
> Fedora 10 infrast
Op 18 feb. 2016 12:54 schreef "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" :
>
> René Ladan writes:
> > in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security vulnerabilities,
> > is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* ports?
>
> Fedora 10 was released 7 years ago and was
Hi,
in light of CVE-2015-7547 and various other security vulnerabilities,
is there any desire to keep the linux-f10-* ports? Last thing I heard
(few years back )is that there were some companies that wanted to hold
on to them (bapt?)
I marked most of those ports as FORBIDDEN once, but that was re
Op 10 okt. 2015 2:13 PM schreef "Kurt Jaeger" :
>
> Hi!
>
> Who is reading this ? I'm asking because of
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181324
>
It arrived in vbox@ which if I understand correctly gets email from
emulation@ but not the other way around.
> Thanks!
>
Regards, R
Hi,
here are some more patches, this time to stage
emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod[-legacy] :
http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/virtualbox-ose-kmod.diff
Is it OK to commit these?
Regards,
René
__
Hi,
in an effort to stage all USES=kmod ports, here is a patch to stage
emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions. Note that it also fixes installing
with DEBUG on, vboxvideo.ko.symbols is no longer built.
Is it OK to commit this?
http://people.freebsd.org/~rene/patches/virtualbox-ose-additions.diff
On 09-10-2013 14:06, lum...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I tried to install port from the subject but I got:
>
> ===>>> Dependency check complete for x11-toolkits/linux-f10-pango
>
> ===>>> multimedia/mplayer >> multimedia/linux-realplayer >> x11-
> toolkits/linux-f10-gtk2 >> x11-toolkits/li
(reply-to: set to emulation@)
On 07-10-2013 20:21, Ryan Reamsbottom wrote:
> There seems to be an issue with the staging for this port.
>
> ===> Staging for linux-f10-pango-1.28.3
> ===> Generating temporary packing list
> cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-f10-pango/work && /usr/bin/find * !
> -
On 06-10-2013 20:38, René Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went through the linux-f10 ports and noted the following old libraries
> for which a newer version is already ported:
> - x11-toolkits/linux-f10-gtk
> - graphics/linux-f10-png10
> - devel/linux-f10-libglade
> - textproc/l
Hi,
I went through the linux-f10 ports and noted the following old libraries
for which a newer version is already ported:
- x11-toolkits/linux-f10-gtk
- graphics/linux-f10-png10
- devel/linux-f10-libglade
- textproc/linux-f10-libxml
The first two are still in active use by other ports but the lat
On 12-07-2013 08:59, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 12.07.2013 01:18, René Ladan пишет:
>> On 05-07-2013 10:16, René Ladan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the expiration of x11-toolkits/qt33 made me look at its Linux
>>> counterpart, which can be safely removed witho
On 05-07-2013 10:16, René Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the expiration of x11-toolkits/qt33 made me look at its Linux
> counterpart, which can be safely removed without any effects on other
> ports. Both 'make index' and 'find /usr/ports -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 3
> -
On 09-07-2013 05:36, Yuri wrote:
> Reporting an error that I got while installing it from binary:
> # pkg_add -r linux_base-f10
> Fetching
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/linux_base-f10.tbz...
> Done.
> sysctl: unknown oid 'compat.linux.osrelease'
> linux
Hi,
the expiration of x11-toolkits/qt33 made me look at its Linux
counterpart, which can be safely removed without any effects on other
ports. Both 'make index' and 'find /usr/ports -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 3
-name Makefile\* | xargs grep qt33' returned nothing after applying the
patch at [1] locally
On 21-06-2013 23:02, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:46:51 +0200
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Boris Samorodov
>> wrote:
>>> 19.06.2013 15:18, René Ladan пишет:
>>>
>>>> right now we have three
Hi,
right now we have three Linux DRI ports around:
- graphics/linux-dri74 (Ubuntu 9.09)
- graphics/linux_dri (unknown, PORTVERSION 7.0)
- graphics/linux-f10-dri
Currently graphics/linux-dri74 is the default. I plan to modify
bsd.linux-apps.mk and bsd.port.mk to change this to linux-f10-dri, aft
On 29-04-2013 13:33, René Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as part of the the "remove FC4 patch" (after 8.4 is out) I came
> across net-im/linux-ymessenger, for which I propose the attached
> patch to un-hardcode some dependencies.
>
> Any objections? (the STRIP= line is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as part of the the "remove FC4 patch" (after 8.4 is out) I came across
net-im/linux-ymessenger, for which I propose the attached patch to
un-hardcode some dependencies.
Any objections? (the STRIP= line is now handled by USE_LINUX=yes)
Regards,
R
PR intended for the exp-run
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 2013/3/12
Subject: Re: ports/176877: [exp-run] remove Fedora Core 4 ports,
adjust Mk/bsd.*.mk
To: Rene Ladan
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `ports/176877'.
The ind
On 11-03-2013 21:10, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:47:56 +0100
> René Ladan wrote:
>
>> I also noted PR ports/169988 containing a patch to update
>> sysutils/linux-procps to a Fedora 10 version, we might apply that
>> instead of just deleting it.
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-03-2013 19:35, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 11.03.2013 14:40, René Ladan пишет:
>> The following reply was made to PR ports/169988; it has been noted by
GNATS.
>>
>> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?=
>> To: bu
The following reply was made to PR ports/169988; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?=
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, slu...@unknown.nu
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/169988: [PATCH] Update sysutils/linux-procps to 3.2.7; also
update to FC10
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:34:52 +01
On 09-03-2013 23:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:07:58 +0100
> René Ladan wrote:
>
>> On 09-03-2013 12:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:04:20 +0100
>>> René Ladan wrote:
>>>
>>>> -BEGI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09-03-2013 13:21, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-03-09 12:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> [emulators/linux_base-c6] - - remove the unsupported Linux
>>> 2.4.2 case - - new Makefile header - - portlint fixes
>>
>> I think the "-p" for makedir w
On 09-03-2013 23:31, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 22:07:58 +0100
> René Ladan wrote:
>
>> On 09-03-2013 12:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:04:20 +0100
>>> René Ladan wrote:
>>>
>>>> -BEGI
On 09-03-2013 14:45, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 09.03.2013 17:14, Alexander Leidinger пишет:
>> On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:36:03 +0400
>> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> 09.03.2013 15:16, Alexander Leidinger пишет:
>>>
The EoL announcement made it clear that ports need to be marked
broken if they d
On 09-03-2013 12:16, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Mar 2013 17:04:20 +0100
> René Ladan wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have made a patch to clean up the old Linux ports (those that
>> ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have made a patch to clean up the old Linux ports (those that
expired together with FreeBSD 7) at [1]
Besides removing expired ports, it:
- - de-orbits support for Linux 2.4.2 (is that still available in the
kernel?)
[Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk]
- -
On 03/05/13 21:21, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:57:08 +0100
> René Ladan wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 03/04/13 21:42, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:11:24 +0100 Ren￩ Ladan
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 03/04/13 13:36
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/04/13 21:42, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:11:24 +0100 Ren￩ Ladan
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/04/13 13:36, Ren￩ Ladan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> since FreeBSD 7.X has reached its end of life, I plan to remove
>>> the expired Linux po
On 03/04/13 13:36, René Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since FreeBSD 7.X has reached its end of life, I plan to remove the
> expired Linux ports for the old Linuxolator (depending on INDEX build
> results) after an official annoucement that 7.X has expired has been
>
Hi,
since FreeBSD 7.X has reached its end of life, I plan to remove the
expired Linux ports for the old Linuxolator (depending on INDEX build
results) after an official annoucement that 7.X has expired has been
sent. From
http://beta.freshports.org/ports-expired.php?sort=expiration_date :
- acce
Hi,
I like to deprecate and eventually remove www/linux-flashplugin9 since
it is unfetchable and has security problems. Attached is a proposed patch.
Regards,
René
Index: Makefile
===
--- Makefile(revision 312281)
+++ Makefile
45 matches
Mail list logo
