maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 203381] [patch] mark mail/thunderbird BROKEN on sparc64

2015-09-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Mark Linimon has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to ge...@freebsd.org: Bug 203381: [patch] mark mail/thunderbird BROKEN on sparc64 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203381 --- Description --- Created attachment 161441 --> https://bugs.freebsd.

[Bug 203381] [patch] mark mail/thunderbird BROKEN on sparc64

2015-09-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203381 Bug ID: 203381 Summary: [patch] mark mail/thunderbird BROKEN on sparc64 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: sparc64 OS: Any Status: New

[Bug 203384] www/firefox: upgrade to 41

2015-09-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203384 Bug ID: 203384 Summary: www/firefox: upgrade to 41 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Onl

maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 203384] www/firefox: upgrade to 41

2015-09-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
Christoph Moench-Tegeder has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to ge...@freebsd.org: Bug 203384: www/firefox: upgrade to 41 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203384 --- Description --- Created attachment 161444 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzi

[Bug 203384] www/firefox: upgrade to 41

2015-09-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203384 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Moench-Tegeder --- Created attachment 161445 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=161445&action=edit stage-qa/check-orphans output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assi

[Bug 200853] databases/sqlite3: enable DBSTAT by default for firefox 41+

2015-09-26 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200853 --- Comment #9 from mil...@ccsys.com --- it's my understanding that the ABI/API impact should be none. furthermore, an application must explicitly ask for this virtual table to be created before using it so there shouldn't be any namespace c