https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198902
--- Comment #1 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
Can you still reproduce comment 0 with firefox-50.0,1 and other packages
up-to-date as well ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200995
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|Closed
Reso
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201607
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203381
Jan Beich (mail not working) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Feedback Timeout
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206273
--- Comment #5 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
Can you still reproduce comment 0 with firefox-50.0,1 and other packages
up-to-date as well ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213706
--- Comment #2 from Jan Beich (mail not working) ---
I confirm, firefox crashes here in 93amd64 jail but not in 93i386. amd64 is
supposed to guarantee SSE2, so what happens here can be either
crt/rtld/libc/libthr bug or miscompilation by la
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214070
--- Comment #2 from Martin Birgmeier ---
Thank you for these remarks.
I understand that maintaining separate -beta ports is too time-consuming. Maybe
it would still be possible to just not include the release candidates in the
release cycl
