> :Trimble is selling a gps kit that can be used to create a Stratum 1
> :GPS referenced NTP server.
> :
> :Qty 1 cost is $995
> :Qty 10 cost is $525
> :
> :Are there 9 other people interested out there ? I'd like to try & put
> :together a group purchase.
>
> I am not particularly impresse
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 19 May 1999, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>
>> I've left out idprio(8) for now.
>>
>> If someone could point me to a man page explaining the use of
>> kern.quantum, and when it might be useful to fiddle with that knob, I'll
>> happily add that reference to the
Have you asked them about a USB version of it? If they will have a USB
version in the near future, let me know. I am more than willing to write
the driver for it, if a sample device including specs passes through me.
When finished I would send the device on to you.
It seems that they have been th
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> > :Trimble is selling a gps kit that can be used to create a Stratum 1
> > :GPS referenced NTP server.
> > :
> > :Qty 1 cost is $995
> > :Qty 10 cost is $525
Actually their developer's kit is significantly cheaper; and you can use
the CM boards quite
Hey,
Is there a way of resetting /dev/dsp?
//Emil
..
Emil Thelinemi...@display-umea.se
work(090177950)http://emil.leker.med.nalle.puh.org
mobile(0706813428) "Another megabytes the dust."
..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in th
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 11:02:38PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> [various GPS chat]
I have been meaning to do some research on this kind of stuff for a while.
We have GPS receivers in the machine room that supply clock for some of
the transmission network, but when I ask the telco guys about the
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Abley [SMTP:jab...@clear.co.nz]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 1999 12:09 PM
> To: Matthew Dillon
> Cc: Joe McGuckin; hack...@freebsd.org; jab...@clear.co.nz
> Subject: GPS receivers for xntpd (off-topic)
>
> On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 11:02:38PM -0700, M
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 12:30:38PM +0200, Ladavac Marino wrote:
> [ML] Back to my olden telco days some 10+ years ago when SDH
> was on paper only and ATM was on benches, this sounds like 2MHz H1*
> clock synchronized to GPS. Since transmission does not need the time of
> day info (at least
Hi,
At 23:02 19/05/99 +1200, you wrote:
[...]
>Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. Feel free to divert me privately to
>a FAQ on this, rather than cluttering up -hackers (I looked but couldn't
>find one).
The fount of all knowledge appears to be http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp
--
Bob Bishop
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> At home I quite happyly use a cheap DeLorme GPS connected to xntpd
> and it just works and works and works :-) I did modify the serial
> output port though; to get a 5v signal on the RI; which the DeLorme
> unit can use instead of its batteries.
>
> But then again
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 11:02:38PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > [various GPS chat]
>
> I have been meaning to do some research on this kind of stuff for a while.
> We have GPS receivers in the machine room that supply clock for some of
> the transmission network, but when
Steven Ames wrote:
>
> Wow. I don't think that should ever happen but at this point I'll
> try a lot of things :)
>
> Tried it. didn't work.
>
> really, isn't there a way to enable more verbose probing so that
> it says 'ed0 not found at 0x280' or some such?
I was waiting someone ELSE answer th
I sent this question to newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but I found
the two answers I got not sufficient. The answers were like "it's inherent
to Unix" and "Just kill those processes".
So now I'm trying the mailing list.
Hello FreeBSD users,
We are an ISP and we recently ins
In the last episode (May 19), Andre Rikkert de Koe said:
> We are an ISP and we recently installed FreeBSD 3.1 on our main
> logonserver. Since than almost every day we find timeconsuming
> processes running while the user isn't even logged in (anymore).
> These programs are mostly tin and lynx and
< said:
> logonserver. Since than almost every day we find timeconsuming processes
> running while the user isn't even logged in (anymore). These programs are
> mostly tin and lynx and such interactive programs. We are sure that they
Some broken interactive programs don't bother to check whether
> > These programs are mostly tin and lynx and such interactive programs.
...
"ee" and "pico" are two more. ee is particularly annoying since it
is one of the "supported" editors...
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
> Read /usr/src/UPDATING. And, more to the point, junk your kernel
> configuration file, and build a new one using GENERIC/LINT as
> reference. Things changed a lot between 3.x and 4.x in this
> particular respect.
>
Always good advice. And always advice that I use. This wasn't
the issue. I track
Steven Ames wrote:
>
> *sigh* No suprise here. As 90% of these things are this was yet
> another Dumb User Error. I had a base address conflict that kept
> the card from being probed.
So, can we say it was due? ;-)
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> > But then again; these things both output serial NMEA, no proper
> > ethernet; and no easy to use PPS signal unless you solder something.
>
> But NTP does have support for the $GPRMC sentence, right? I've been
> using my
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Andre Rikkert de Koe wrote:
>
> I sent this question to newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but I found
> the two answers I got not sufficient. The answers were like "it's inherent
> to Unix" and "Just kill those processes".
> So now I'm trying the mailing list.
Sir, you m
At 10:32 +0930 05/19/99, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > device pcm0 at isa ? port? tty irq 7 drq 1
>
> Shouldn't it just be 'device pcm0'?
Yes. I only add 'device pcm0' to my kernel configuration file.
% dmesg
(snap)
Probing for devices on PCI bus 0:
chip0: rev 0x03 on pci0.0.0
chip1: rev 0x03 on
Hello All,
I have recently exchanged some email with a person involved in the upcoming
c9x - new version of ANSI C, which is, among other things, supposed to bring
some changes in localization functions.
Since I am working on the wctype.h functions, I asked him where I could learn
more about the
On Wed, 19 May 1999, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have recently exchanged some email with a person involved in the upcoming
> c9x - new version of ANSI C, which is, among other things, supposed to bring
> some changes in localization functions.
>
> Since I am working on the wctype
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Becoming well versed in C++ has meant that I can now bore you endlessly
> with well expressed reasons why I dislike C++. Now you have all the
> language propeller-heads wanting to change C into a C++ lookalike.
I've always preferred Objective-C, simply
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 06:16:04PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I tell you, I must say that the new spec, from what I've heard (and some
> limited reading of magazine articles), brings in a lot of C++ to C, and
> really is a gift to compiler vendors. No changes *I'd* want.
Ye, gods! You're scaring
: [ gps talk ]
:...
I've been very impressed with the newer ( last 5 months ) Garmin
handhelds. The older ones only had 8 channel receivers. The newer
ones have 12 channel receivers sensitive enough that the units often
work indoors.
-Mat
> On Wed, 19 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> > Becoming well versed in C++ has meant that I can now bore you endlessly
> > with well expressed reasons why I dislike C++. Now you have all the
> > language propeller-heads wanting to change C into a C++ lookalike.
>
>
> I've always preferred Obje
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Andre Rikkert de Koe wrote:
> I sent this question to newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc but I found
> the two answers I got not sufficient. The answers were like "it's inherent
> to Unix" and "Just kill those processes".
> So now I'm trying the mailing list.
As pointed ou
> It's usually due to a bug in the application. When a user exits, the
> stdin/stdout filedescriptors on any backgrounded processes go away.
> That makes any read() calls return with an error. If the application
> doesn't check the return value of its read(), it can go into a tight
> loop it'll
Hi!
I have tried to install 3.1 on two machines but on both of
them I was not able to boot it after installation. The
3.0-snapshot from May-98 worked fine on both of them.
But 3.1 did not boot. First, the MBR boot manager was not able to
boot any partition, nor FreeBSD nor UnixWare. After I repla
Some of you may already know this - I'm wondering about the pain involved in
fitting it to our architecture. Journaling. Hmmm.
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,36807,00.html?owv
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million k
"Louis A. Mamakos" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 19 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> >
> > > Becoming well versed in C++ has meant that I can now bore you endlessly
> > > with well expressed reasons why I dislike C++. Now you have all the
> > > language propeller-heads wanting to change C into a C++ lookali
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> : [ gps talk ]
> :...
>
> I've been very impressed with the newer ( last 5 months ) Garmin
> handhelds. The older ones only had 8 channel receivers. The newer
> ones have 12 channel receivers sensitive enough that the units often
> work indoors.
My GPS
I'm exploring hardware setups for FreeBSD and I'm curious how SMP is
coming. What is the consensus on its stability at this point, and how
far is it from loosing its 'beta' classification? Also, anyone running
FreeBSD on a Xeon processor? I'm trying to figure out the best way to
max FreeBSD's p
Wes Peters writes:
> The LinkSys cards use the LiteOn PNIC chip, which is a "follow-on" to
> the DEC Tulip. There is a driver for it in 3.x (device pn), you'd have
> to back-port it to 2.2.x if you want to use it there. I've only had
> them for a few days but so far everything has come up r
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
> > Truly and example of the "less is more" concept in action. I've done
> > some non-trivial development in Objective-C, and I can assure you that
> > I haven't missed C++'s operator overloading.
>
> I on the other hand have written working embedded system
On Wed, 19 May 1999, Nick Popoff wrote:
this should really be on s...@freebsd.org?
> I'm exploring hardware setups for FreeBSD and I'm curious how SMP is
> coming. What is the consensus on its stability at this point, and how
> far is it from loosing its 'beta' classification? Also, anyone ru
I had to reboot a few times today, and got bugged by the boot
countdown timer telling me it was going to boot in 1 seconds.
The change to src/sys/boot/common/boot.c is trivial, but I'm always
impressed when a program gets these details right.
-matt
*** boot.c.orig Thu May 20 01:11:00 1999
--- b
38 matches
Mail list logo
