On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> This is because none of your ethernet interfaces matches `pc7'.
>
> 1/ What does `route -n -v get -host pc7' show?
bash-2.02# route -n -v get -host pc7
u: inet 195.117.4.106; u: link ; RTM_GET: Report Metrics: len 128, pid: 0, seq 1
, errno 0, flags:
l
> What do you mean by "bind a class C"? Make an interface so it will
> respond to incoming requests for 10.1.2.x? ewww, yuck!
Is it any less elegant than having in_localaddr() trawling through each item
on the address list? Perhaps 1024 items if you've got a large vweb server?
That's also pre
> > What do you mean by "bind a class C"? Make an interface so it will
> > respond to incoming requests for 10.1.2.x? ewww, yuck!
>
> Is it any less elegant than having in_localaddr() trawling through each item
> on the address list? Perhaps 1024 items if you've got a large vweb server?
> Tha
Hi!
Does anyone have an idea what is going on here?
: # route add -host 10.0.0.13 -iface sl8
: add host 10.0.0.13: gateway sl8
: # netstat -rn | grep ^10.0.0.13
: 10.0.0.13 sl8UHS 00 sl8
: # arp -s 10.0.0.13 1:1:1:1:1:1 pub
: # netstat -rn | grep ^10
On Mon 1999-10-18 (15:46), Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> I am trying to change the mount point of a mounted filesystem (from
> /testme to /test) with the update option (-u):
That's not how -u works. From the man page:
-u The -u flag indicates that the status of an already mounted file
sys
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Jerry Bell wrote:
>
> > I have a few proposed additions to IPFW that I'd like to get feedback
> > on. The changes are mostly from my experience with other (commercial)
> > firewalls.
> >
> > Change source and destination identifier in the rule pro
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 12:52:49PM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> I think somebody sent patches to do it a while back. I think it might be
> in GNATS.
Yes, and yes.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=12071
--
perl -wMstrict -e'$,="PLEASE";$;=" DO ";@_=map{$?=255&256+$!-$_;$!=$_;++$.%4-2?
$;:
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Graham Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 1999, Robert Watson wrote:
> > Can't help you with the PnP stuff, but I will be at the Washington, DC
> > IETF meeting in November :-). Would be great to do a FreeBSD-oriented
> > get-together... That said, people are rapidly claiming
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:02:08AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > What do you mean by "bind a class C"? Make an interface so it will
> > respond to incoming requests for 10.1.2.x? ewww, yuck!
>
> Is it any less elegant than having in_localaddr() trawling through each item
> on the address list
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> On Mon 1999-10-18 (15:46), Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> > I am trying to change the mount point of a mounted filesystem (from
> > /testme to /test) with the update option (-u):
>
> That's not how -u works. From the man page:
>
> -u The -u flag i
On Monday, 18 October 1999 at 3:17:31 +0900, ?$B8EC+?(B ?$BE/O:?(B wrote:
> From: Jacques Vidrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Search a symbol in the source tree
> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 11:37:11 -0500
> n> On 18 October 1999 at 0:39, Tetsuro Teddy FURUYA
>(=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOEVDKxsoQiAb
Here's a way to do it without patches:
1. in your webserver:
a. ipfw add fwd localhost from any to 1.2.3/24 http
b. add sections, like this:
ServerName web.freebsd.org
ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DocumentRoot /home/web
2. in your ro
I am considering using ipfw to bind class C's to an interface. Does
anyone do this? What may be the pros/cons?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
The iozone performs 10 operations: read, write, re-read, re-write, read
backwards, read strided, fread, fwrite, random read, pread. Can anyone
explain to me a little more than what their names imply or give me some
references?
Any help is appreciated.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
As Warner Losh wrote ...
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Fromme
>writes:
> : Beware, I have not actually tried this with FreeBSD, and there
> : might be bugs that prevent using 2.88 Mb floppies.
>
> The BIOS will report a different value for the 2.88MB drives to the
> probe routines...
Well I searched the mailinglists and didn't really got further than
discovering that unistd.h goes a little way to provide functionality
which getopt.h from glibc provides. And seeing that a question of Bill
early 1999 never got answered correctly. I cc:'d Bruce on this since I
value his stylist
Hi,
just been messing with some more include files and I am curious about
something.
[Note: CURRENT system]
I have a soundcard.h in both include/sys and include/machine.
Which should have preference over the other, why does one simply not
include the other. In other words, why two _exactly_ t
On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> > Is the UMAPFS working? I add "options UMAPFS" to the configuration file
> > of FreeBSD 3.3-Release and rebuilt the kernel. I got the following
> > errors:
> >
> > loading kernel
> > umap_vnops.o: I
Running a late 3.2-stable, im getting
fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type = 0, addr = 0
the card has a GD82559 Intel part on it
Is there an updated version of the driver that supports this?
Thanks,
Dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hacke
> In unistd.h we have definitions for getopt, optarg, optind, opterr, and
> optopt.
These are the standard POSIX (.2?) declarations.
> The things I propose to add to unistd.h are the following:
> struct option
> {
> char*name;
> int has_arg;
> int *flag;
> in
In the last episode (Oct 20), Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai said:
> just been messing with some more include files and I am curious about
> something.
>
> [Note: CURRENT system]
>
> I have a soundcard.h in both include/sys and include/machine.
>
> Which should have preference over the other, why does
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> Well I searched the mailinglists and didn't really got further than
> discovering that unistd.h goes a little way to provide functionality
> which getopt.h from glibc provides. And seeing that a question of Bill
> early 1999 never got answered
as mentioned in FreeBSDCon, IEEE1394 driver for FreeBSD (for TI chipset)
is here:
http://www.sfc.wide.ad.jp/DVTS/
hope this helps.
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
As Wilko Bulte wrote ...
> As Warner Losh wrote ...
> > The BIOS will report a different value for the 2.88MB drives to the
> > probe routines... You may need to do some touchup there as well.
>
> As you seem to have used these 2.88 drives before: do I need to do something
> special when I inst
24 matches
Mail list logo
