> >
> >I have some concern about jail, and would like to discuss them.
> >
> >Currentlly jail set an ip-number and let prisoned processes
> >only to bind it.
> >My concerns are,
> >
> >(1)When IPv6 is added to the system, more general id would be
> > desirable.
>
> I agree, *IF* IPv6 ever becom
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yoshinobu Inoue writes:
>Hello,
>
>I have some concern about jail, and would like to discuss them.
>
>Currentlly jail set an ip-number and let prisoned processes
>only to bind it.
>My concerns are,
>
>(1)When IPv6 is added to the system, more general id would be
>
Hello,
I have some concern about jail, and would like to discuss them.
Currentlly jail set an ip-number and let prisoned processes
only to bind it.
My concerns are,
(1)When IPv6 is added to the system, more general id would be
desirable.
(2)What is the goal of the restriction?
If physica
Nate Williams wrote:
> What happens when this is done? Can it ever work?
>
> How about the reverse, where you link in PIC compiled libraries into
> static (.a) libraries? Does this work?
>
> Assuming it works (in either case) are there any performance
> hits/advantages to either?
>
> My impre
Not yet -- I'm part way into porting the driver, but my experience with
pccard programming and the kernel pccard interface is somewhat dated. I
hope to have better news soon--however, I'd welcome better news from
someone else :-). Brian Wellington, who sits beside me with a NetBSD
machine, comm
Zhihui Zhang wrote...
>
> I did a little remote debugging with serial cable on 4.0-current a while
> ago. But now I can not make it work on 3.3-RELEASE.
>
> I have used kermit to make sure that the cable connection is good. I also
> have added necessary kernel options into the configuration fi
I did a little remote debugging with serial cable on 4.0-current a while
ago. But now I can not make it work on 3.3-RELEASE.
I have used kermit to make sure that the cable connection is good. I also
have added necessary kernel options into the configuration file. My
questions are:
(1) What f
hi, i recently migrated our news box (which runs approx. 1MB/s nntp
traffic inbound and >2MB/s outbound) to several systems and got the
spool onto a vinum volume that spans 6 scsi busses (adaptec 3940UW) each
4 disks (IBM DNES 18GB). theres a private switched interconnect between
the reader box an
hi,
On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 05:29:02PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > IMHO, it would be nice to have password protected loader(8) (like linux lilo)
> > or just ACLs for loader(8)'s "more" command (like unavailable for viewing
> > files)
>
> cat >/boot/passwd.4th < Say... does LILO have a sc
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
writes:
: machine/bus.h claims, in its comment section, that it supports 8 byte
: read/writes, but never in the whole file does it declare anything
: remotely akin to bus_space_read_8().
:
: Any reason why not?
Because no busses that we supp
What happens when this is done? Can it ever work?
How about the reverse, where you link in PIC compiled libraries into
static (.a) libraries? Does this work?
Assuming it works (in either case) are there any performance
hits/advantages to either?
My impression from past discussions is that you
Has anyone got the Baystack IETF loaner cards working under FreeBSD yet?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Sun, 7 Nov 1999 10:15:42 -0500 (EST), Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The _REALLY_ obvious solution to this is to find the real path on exec()
>and store the pointer in proc. How is this full of "overhead" and
>"impractical"?
Finding _an_ absolute path on exec() is not
Hi,
machine/bus.h claims, in its comment section, that it supports 8 byte
read/writes, but never in the whole file does it declare anything
remotely akin to bus_space_read_8().
Any reason why not?
The outcome of this answer will determine whether I make a patch to
correct the comments or add th
>
> Yes, loading from an ext2fs partition works fine. Well, I tried for the
> last 10 minutes to find a suitable way to tell in a manner that would not
> sounds religious that using ext2fs is not really an option to no avail.
Well, let's be practical. Is there any alternative? If the firmware
hi,
I just looked over 12th chapter of the handbook (PC Hardware compatibility)
and found that we _must_ update and add/extend all sub-chapters there. This
chapter is mostly based on information submited at 1995. It's very sad! :-(
Please, take a look over this chapter and feel free to subm
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 10:24 AM
> To: Stephane Potvin
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ARM support
>
>
> Stephane Potvin wrote:
> >
> > > M... have you tried ext2fs?
> >
> > Yes, loading fro
Stephane Potvin wrote:
>
> > M... have you tried ext2fs?
>
> Yes, loading from an ext2fs partition works fine. Well, I tried for the
> last 10 minutes to find a suitable way to tell in a manner that would not
> sounds religious that using ext2fs is not really an option to no avail.
> I guess
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 3:29 AM
> To: Stephane E. Potvin
> Cc: Mike Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ARM support
>
>
> "Stephane E. Potvin" wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately no. It uses a stripped dow
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 08:18:17PM -1000, Richard Puga wrote:
> I am having trouble with a PCMCIA chipset
>
> I have a ISA to PCMCIA adaptor, it is made by ActionTec model no. PC-250
> www.actiontec.com
>
> the chip on it has the following information on it;
>
>
> D japan
> DB6082
> 1992 DATAB
"Stephane E. Potvin" wrote:
>
> Unfortunately no. It uses a stripped down linux kernel as firmware.
In that case the source code is available, yes?
M... have you tried ext2fs?
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What y'all wanna d
> * Matthew Dillon
> | FreeBSD boxes can handle up to 4 Gigabytes of main memory.
>
> Is this true for the Alpha kernels too?
There are issues with > 1GB of RAM on Alphas at the moment, which may
be easier to resolve soon. We have a 4100 with 1GB, which should be
upgraded to 1.5 shortly a
Matthew Dillon scribbled this message on Nov 7:
> When you write to a raw disk with your dd, it is reading a block from
> /dev/zero into its local buffer which involves a zeroing operation
> that the read code never had to do, then dd writes the buffer to disk.
thank you! this is exa
23 matches
Mail list logo
