I have an exceedingly strange problem. Every once in a while, I
try running CVSup and get an undefined symbol; I try again, and then
it works fine... This also happened today with Mozilla. Here's exactly
what happened:
{"/home/green"}$ mozilla
MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME=/home/green/mozilla/dist/bin
I am fooling around with vinum which I have set up in a raid 5
configuration under FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE.
The trouble is that my machine keeps locking up under heavy use. If I
try and "make world" it dies about 15-60 seconds into it whit a page
fault as well as trying to ftp over large files and
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You should do a 'config' again before making a kernel from -stable
sources.
*Always* re-run config(8) before building a kernel from updated
sources.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are hash collisions handled reasonably?
No, they're not handled at all. :-) Doing that would require:
1. remembering all the nodes that we have seen and the hash values
given to them
2. having some backup-hash to use for the node that collides and then
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Assar Westerlund wrote:
Why can't a file system have more than 2^32 files?
Because if it does you can't stat it! There's a great case of circular
reasoning for you. ;^)
The other reasoning goes like this: va_fileid should be unique which
means it
At 09:15 PM 11/20/99 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
I'll test this in 3.3 shortly...has anything been done in this area? It
seems to happen on passive backplace systems (although its more likely the
chipsets used on SBCs)...my acer MB doesnt lock up with the same test. This
problem has been
Hi
I've got myself an ATX motherboard and Powersupply, and I want to get
this softpower stuff going.
The manual says 'to enable soft shutdown, select shutdown from the start menu'
well thats kinda usefull.
Anyway, I issue commans such as 'halt' and 'shutdown -h'
but I still get a message
On 22-Nov-99 Bryan Collins wrote:
Anyway, I issue commans such as 'halt' and 'shutdown -h'
but I still get a message saying its safe to turn off the power.
You need apm turned on, and then do shutdown -p now.
---
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software -
At 12:21 PM 11/21/99 -0800, you wrote:
At 09:15 PM 11/20/99 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
I'll test this in 3.3 shortly...has anything been done in this area? It
seems to happen on passive backplace systems (although its more
likely the
chipsets used on SBCs)...my acer MB doesnt lock up with
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dennis wrote:
!Its a late 3.2-STABLE. so its not that old. Surely someone knows if
!something in this area was fixed or not?
!
!Since its a DMA lockup, how would you suggest that the informatoin about
!what instruction was executing be obtained?
!
!The nightmare of
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Parthasarathy M. Aji wrote:
Thanks Julian. But we are rewriting Kernel src file ip_fw.c (which
does implement the ipfw system call i guess) to do the redirection
automatically for us, because redirection is faster at the Kernel than at
the user level.
Unfortunately I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bosko Milekic
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 5:51 PM
To: Dennis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?)
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Dennis wrote:
!Its a late 3.2-STABLE.
Dennis has a good point.
for slower? I've ran FreeBSD for years and now I run a combo of -STABLE
and -CURRENT and you know what? It's all good! My hardware is the bottle
neck and its just as fast as 2.x was.
Do you have some numbers to back this up? (unfortunately "It's all good!"
doesn't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Stein
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 6:26 PM
To: FreeBSD
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?)
Dennis has a good point.
for slower? I've ran
OK, in this case, you may want to check your BIOS for it's APM options, I
had to change some of my BIOS options to get my computer to shut off
properly but I don't remember which options.
fixed!
I changed flags to 0x40 from 0x31 (i.e get lines from BIOS and don't force
1.0/1.1 apm)
A
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Christopher Stein wrote:
Dennis has a good point.
Dennis has no point unless he provides some numbers to quantify his
claim.
Witness:
FreeBSD 3.X is the fastest thing I have ever seen: it's so much faster
than 2.X, I can only guess what 4.X is going to be like!
There,
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Christopher Stein wrote:
Dennis has a good point.
Dennis has no point unless he provides some numbers to quantify his
claim.
His point was not a claim about performance, rather he was bringing into
question whether
On Sun, 21 Nov 1999, Christopher Stein wrote:
Dennis has a good point.
Dennis has no point unless he provides some numbers to quantify his
claim.
His point was not a claim about performance, rather he was bringing into
question whether performance was improving with successive
Scott Hess wrote:
I've checked further, and found that FreeBSD correctly handles blocking
signals on a per-thread basis. _But_, all threads still get EINTR when a
signal happens while they're in a blocking read.
I've attached the updated program that shows the correct delivery of the
His point was not a claim about performance, rather he was bringing into
question whether performance was improving with successive releases.
Bringing something into question without detail is useless. If I
seriously questioned your sexual orientation, for example, you'd have
every right to
His point was not a claim about performance, rather he was bringing into
question whether performance was improving with successive releases.
Sounded very much to me like he was just vaguely griping about how slow
and unstable newer versions of FreeBSD are compared to the good old days.
21 matches
Mail list logo
