On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Saturday, 18 December 1999 at 14:51:59 +, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
How does one compile a version of GDB that can read a.out files?
I know there is a way of doing it but I have totoally failed to work
Once again, I apologize for asking a question that is probably off-list,
but...
Here's the problem: I'm running a fresh install of 3.3-STABLE, and trying to
get the nice graphical login, with either XDM or KDM. Unfortunantly, I get an
'incorrect password' error no matter what I type. I also get
Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Also
at my pre-previous employer we had small 8-port 10Mpbs hubs from
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel C. Sobral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
As I say, my understanding is that FreeBSD still doesn't have real
and/or complete thread support in the kernel. So if you have a
multi-threaded application and one thread blocks (e.g.
Wes Peters wrote (on Dec 16):
Have you considered buying Metro-X? It supports up to 4 screens on just
about any combination of AGP and PCI Matrox cards. For more information,
see http://www.metrolink.com/productindex.html and look for Multi-Headed
Display Support. Metro-X is only $39.
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Matthew Dillon
had to walk into mine and say:
:At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100 switched
:hub. It works fine except that it hangs occasionally (can be
:reset by power-cycling). So we don't buy them any more. Also
:Uhm uhm uhm. You do *not* want to say things like that within earshot
:of me. Describe the cards better. Describe how you came to the
:conclusion that they aren't supported. What chip is on them? If it's
:the LC82C115 then these are the LNE100TX Version 2.0 with Wake On LAN,
:and they *are*
:I have a D-Link DSH-5 5-port 10/100 dualspeed hub here at home,
:and I'm reasonably happy with it. It certainly doesn't hang. One
:of the machines here has trouble negotiating a working 100Mbit/s
:link, but that's just as likely a problem of the Linux tulip driver.
:...
:Christian "naddy"
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Matthew Dillon
had to walk into mine and say:
:Uhm uhm uhm. You do *not* want to say things like that within earshot
:of me. Describe the cards better. Describe how you came to the
:conclusion that they aren't supported. What chip is
:with a *really* big heatsink attached -this is the "bridge on chip". And
:I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
:(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
:
:It was than than I make the connection - Hmm.. SGI LCD monitor don't work.
:Ethernet switch
:
: I'll try adding 'dc' in. If it works, can I add a comment about
: 'LNE100TX' cards to the comments in LINT for 'dc'?
:
:Sure, if you like, however note that "man 4 dc" should also yield a
:list of supported cards, including the LNE100TX v2.0.
:
:-Bill
Yup, but that assumes you
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
The _clean_ way of doing it would be to write your multi-user server using
threads, and to assign one thread to each connection. If you can do that,
then the logic in the program becomes quite
Try this,
cat ~/.xsession
xterm -sl 1000 -sb
twm(or the famous $SOMEPATH/startkde;)
Ctrl-d
/stefan
Rob King wrote:
Once again, I apologize for asking a question that is probably off-list,
but...
Here's the problem: I'm running a fresh install of 3.3-STABLE, and trying to
get the nice
Hello all:)
I'm looking for an alternate ftpd which allows me to take certain
(configurable) actions based on the receipt of certain files. For exmple,
I want to "process" a tar file full of jpg images upon receipt.
I know there are alternatives. I can run swatch on the log file or
torture
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Daniel C. Sobral" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
As I say, my understanding is that FreeBSD still doesn't have real and/or
complete thread support in the kernel. So if you have a multi-threaded
application and one thread blocks (e.g.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel C. Sobral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
As I say, my understanding is that FreeBSD still doesn't have real
and/or complete thread support in the kernel. So
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 12:40:09PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Daniel C. Sobral" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD has userland threads. This is faster than kernel threads, but
Actually, userland threads *should* be faster, but for lots of
things, they
For those of you who don't know, I've been working on a driver for the
ADMtek USB Ethernet chip (AN986 Pegasus). It kinda sorta works:
aue0: ADMtek Inc. ADMtek 10/100 USB MAC, rev 1.10/1.01, addr 2
aue0: Ethernet address: 00:00:e8:00:00:a2
miibus0: MII bus on aue0
ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:with a *really* big heatsink attached -this is the "bridge on chip". And
:I noticed another, smaller IC which had a hole blown out of the epoxy case
:(which subsequently allowed the smoke to escape.
:
:It was than than I make the connection - Hmm.. SGI LCD monitor
"Matthew" == Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matthew :At work I've got experience with 32-port D-Link 10/100
Matthew switched :hub. It works fine except that it hangs
Matthew occasionally (can be :reset by power-cycling). So we
Matthew don't buy them any more. Also :at
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Richard Seaman, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would really be very grateful however if _someone_ would explain to me
the actual low level-mechanics of how this works, i.e. how one thread in
a ``multi-userland-thread'' process can manage to get control and/or
: Heh heh. Indeed, they are LNE100TX V2.0 cards.
:
: I'll try adding 'dc' in. If it works, can I add a comment about
: 'LNE100TX' cards to the comments in LINT for 'dc'?
:
:Sure, if you like, however note that "man 4 dc" should also yield a
:list of supported cards, including the
: I really hate these switching regulated DC wall plugs. They always use
: cheap caps in them to save money and then don't bother adding any
: protection to the motherboard. I prefer AC wall plugs or unregulated DC
: wall plugs and then a small switching regulator on the
:I'd like to just take a second and re-express my growing confusion on
:this whole topic.
:
:Why do you say that this complete-process-blocking effect only takes
:place in the case of disk reads?? Isn't a read a read? What difference
:does it make what the device type being read from is?
:
:Is
Anybody know of any currently available, that are supported by FreeBSD?
Brian Beattie| The only problem with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | winning the rat race ...
www.aracnet.com/~beattie | in the end you're still a rat
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Bill Paul wrote:
For those of you who don't know, I've been working on a driver for the
ADMtek USB Ethernet chip (AN986 Pegasus). It kinda sorta works:
aue0: ADMtek Inc. ADMtek 10/100 USB MAC, rev 1.10/1.01, addr 2
aue0: Ethernet address: 00:00:e8:00:00:a2
miibus0:
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 01:21:15PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
It sounds to me like each and every time there is a thread context switch,
some code in the library may have to execute a (perhaps enormous) call to
select() or else to poll(). Yes?
poll(). It used to use select(). And,
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Julian Elischer
had to walk into mine and say:
Doug Ambrisko and I wrote a netgraph based USB-to-USB networking device
node. We used the async method and it works fine. We just added
a queue and called an interrupt level 'start
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Beattie
writes:
: Anybody know of any currently available, that are supported by FreeBSD?
No.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I'd like to just take a second and re-express my growing confusion on
:this whole topic.
:
:Why do you say that this complete-process-blocking effect only takes
:place in the case of disk reads?? Isn't a read a read? What
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Richard Seaman, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 01:21:15PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
It sounds to me like each and every time there is a thread context switch,
some code in the library may have to execute a (perhaps enormous) call
[This might not belong on -hackers, but I'm not sure where this
sort of discussion _does_ belong}.
Occasionally, single CVS changes affect large numbers of files. The
comments associated with those commits generally fall into 3 categories:
1) Import version x.y into vendor branch z
2) [Detailed
On Sun, Dec 19, 1999 at 02:49:26PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I dunno if it goes without saying or not, but this certainly makes
the current FreeBSD threads implementation highly unpalatable, except
to support ported code which has been developed elsewhere and which
is already written
Are there plans to add support for PAT on Intel P6 and AMD Athlon processors?
This feature provides more flexible interface allowing to setup various memory
cache modes on a page-by-page bases. It is much easier to program than MTRRs
and does not suffer from their size/alignment limitations.
I have worked around this for now by hacking usbdi.c so that it polls
the controller interrupt/status register instead of tsleep()ing. I'm not
sure this is the best solution, but it's the only one that seems to work.
why not use the async method?
Because this is not an
35 matches
Mail list logo
