Installing -current

2000-02-03 Thread Jonas Bülow
Hi, What is the easiest way to install FreeBSD-current? Do I have to install a 3.x release and then cvsup to the -current followed by a make world? Before I ran into trouble I want to ask if 4.0 supports the 3CCFE574BT NIC? (3com 3c574). Right now I'm running this NIC with FreeBSD3.3+PAO on a T

Mailing list search engine at www.freebsd.org down for repair.

2000-02-03 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Hi all, Our primary mail server, using the special type of evil ESP abilities which all critical hardware items possess, took advantage of everyone (including our postmaster) being away at LinuxWorld in New York to exhibit the "F" in "MTBF" with respect to hard drive specifications. We have mail

open ref counts in CAM and vn

2000-02-03 Thread Guido van Rooij
A collegue fo mine had the problem that it was possible to vnconfig -u a vn device that was currently in use. This strikes me as odd. When looking through the da device code, I notice a similar problem. Suppose I have a zip fdisk mounted with a disklabel and 2 ufs partitions on it. When I mount bo

Re: how to catch a wildrunning pointer

2000-02-03 Thread Thomas Klein
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 28.01.2000 11:49:34 To: Thomas Klein/Aachen/Utimaco/DE@utimaco cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: how to catch a wildrunning pointer > > > > Hi > > > > My Problem: > > Within a kernel timeout routine I allocate memory and fill it with dat

Re: Removing interfaces

2000-02-03 Thread Nick Hibma
if_kue, if_aue or ask Doug Ambrisko for a copy of the udbp (USB double bulk pipe) driver that should have that as well. Nick On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote: > With all the PCMCIA card stuff going on, is it now possible to > remove a networking interface in FreeBSD (from within the kern

Re: porting linux app. Syscalls

2000-02-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
> what confuses me is that you don't support bootstrapping from the > system C compiler. How do you propose to do that with an all pascal source? Marco van de Voort ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe f

Re: porting linux app. Syscalls

2000-02-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > see: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi > you can view linux syscalls from the slackware docs. Thank you that seems to be a good lead to start with. The problem was that I couldn't find any documentation :_) Marco van de Voort ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Re/Fwd: freebsd specific search

2000-02-03 Thread Mike Bristow
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 09:59:08PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Michael Bacarella wrote: > > > Not to start a flame-fest or anything (but who doesn't love em?), I hear > > the above quite a lot. > > > > I'm under the firm belief that a decent sys admin can rub either system t

Re: open ref counts in CAM and vn

2000-02-03 Thread Mark Huizer
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 10:26:15AM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: > A collegue fo mine had the problem that it was possible to > vnconfig -u a vn device that was currently in use. This strikes > me as odd. When trying to add some refcounting in sys/dev/vn.c, I wanted to switch to using the kernel

Re: porting linux app. Syscalls

2000-02-03 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The modula-3 port is about the same size as yours, and it > bootstraps, but (like you said) it does it from C. Actually, the standard Modula-3 bootstraps contain assembly-language sources generated by a cross-compiler, not

Re: Removing interfaces

2000-02-03 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Nick Hibma writes: | | if_kue, if_aue or ask Doug Ambrisko for a copy of the udbp (USB double | bulk pipe) driver that should have that as well. The udbp doesn't do it since it just creates a netgraph node. Then you tie that netgraph node to an interface. At that point netgraph makes an interf

Re: open ref counts in CAM and vn

2000-02-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 10:26:15 +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: > A collegue fo mine had the problem that it was possible to > vnconfig -u a vn device that was currently in use. This strikes > me as odd. > When looking through the da device code, I notice a similar problem. > Suppose I have a zip f

Re: porting linux app. Syscalls

2000-02-03 Thread Steve Kargl
Marco van de Voort wrote: > > what confuses me is that you don't support bootstrapping from the > > system C compiler. > > How do you propose to do that with an all pascal source? > I probably don't need to tell you this, but there is ports/lang/p2c. I've never used p2c, so I can't make any

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Matthew Jacob
> The FreeBSD driver (written by Matt Jacob) is based on the Linux driver, > which Intel wrote, and he hasn't yet managed to get decent throughput > through the cards. (Maybe Matt will comment.) They also only have 64K of > memory on board, which is insufficient for a heavily loaded server, IMO

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 10:50:32 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > The FreeBSD driver (written by Matt Jacob) is based on the Linux driver, > > which Intel wrote, and he hasn't yet managed to get decent throughput > > through the cards. (Maybe Matt will comment.) They also only have 64K of > >

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Matthew Jacob
> > I think the memory would come in handy on a heavily loaded system, since > you would gain a little extra time in case you were a little late servicing > interrupts. i.e. it would smooth out the bumps a little bit. Yes, but that's what having 8192 2KByte descriptors handy is for... (that's 1

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Matthew Jacob
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:23:45 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > I think the memory would come in handy on a heavily loaded system, since > > > you would gain a little extra time in case you were a little late servicing > > > interrupts. i.e. it would smooth out the bumps a little bi

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:23:45 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > I think the memory would come in handy on a heavily loaded system, since > > you would gain a little extra time in case you were a little late servicing > > interrupts. i.e. it would smooth out the bumps a little bit. > > Yes,

IPFW / IP Filter question

2000-02-03 Thread lists
A quick question, is it possible to copy all traffic coming into a particular interface to a divert socket, while still having the traffic also running normally and taking normal routes etc. I would have thought you would use the tee option in ipfw for this, but its not implemented yet according

Re: IPFW / IP Filter question

2000-02-03 Thread Guido van Rooij
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:28:49PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A quick question, is it possible to copy all traffic coming into a > particular interface to a divert socket, while still having the traffic > also running normally and taking normal routes etc. > > I would have thought you woul

Re: porting linux app. Syscalls

2000-02-03 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > The modula-3 port is about the same size as yours, and it > > bootstraps, but (like you said) it does it from C. > > Actually, the standard Modula-3 bootstraps contain assembly-language > sources generated by a cross-compiler, not C. Actually that is the first plan too for fpc. This because

Re: IBM releases JFS for Linux.

2000-02-03 Thread Wes Peters
Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > This came across the Linux/390 mailing list today, I thought it > might be interesting for people: > > The URL there is incorrect - the correct one is: > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jfs This has been reported on daily.daemonnews.org.

Re: IBM releases JFS for Linux.

2000-02-03 Thread Wes Peters
Greg Lehey wrote: > > On Wednesday, 2 February 2000 at 22:18:02 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > > This came across the Linux/390 mailing list today, I thought it > > might be interesting for people: > > > >> "IBM makes JFS technology available for Linux - Technology based on OS/2 > >> Wa

Re: IBM releases JFS for Linux.

2000-02-03 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 3 February 2000 at 19:24:07 -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > Greg Lehey wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, 2 February 2000 at 22:18:02 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote: >>> >>> This came across the Linux/390 mailing list today, I thought it >>> might be interesting for people: >>> "IBM makes

Re: IBM releases JFS for Linux.

2000-02-03 Thread Matthew Jacob
> > Wait until I deliver. > > I've taken a look, and there's as good as no docco. It's an OS/2 > version, which suggests to me that it would be more difficult to port > than the original AIX version. I might get back to it again later on, > but don't hold your breath. > I was informed, at Ve

Re: Re/Fwd: freebsd specific search

2000-02-03 Thread Wes Peters
Mike Bristow wrote: > > True; but linux has support for a bigger variety of soundcards > (my Win98^H^H^H^H^H^HEverQuest machine now has a Live! in it; supported > under Linux but not under FreeBSD AFAIK; so the other half of the disk > may turn turn into ext2 rather than ffs) > > The other 2 box

Re: Installing -current

2000-02-03 Thread Assar Westerlund
Jonas Bülow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, Hej. > What is the easiest way to install FreeBSD-current? Grab floopies and install over FTP from current.freebsd.org. And then run cvsup if you want to update to even more current code. > Before I ran into trouble I want to ask if 4.0 supports t

mounting openbsd disks

2000-02-03 Thread Warner Losh
I have a need to mount a disk that was partitioned and labeled on OpenBSD. I'm getting the following errors when I try: # disklabel ad2 disklabel: ioctl DIOCGDINFO: Invalid argument Any chance I can tweak something small and get access to these disks. Here's what fdisk has to say: Information

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Kenneth D. Merry had to walk into mine and say: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 13:03:09 -0500, Thomas Stromberg wrote: > > We're currently looking at upgrading several of our FreeBSD servers > > (dual PIII-600's, 66MHz PCI) and some Sun Ultra'

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
[ Thanks for the info Bill! ] On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 21:29:27 -0500, Bill Paul wrote: > Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Kenneth D. Merry had > to walk into mine and say: > > > The Netgear GA620 is a 512K Tigon 2 board, and generally goes for around > > $300 or so. Th

Re: Suggestions for Gigabit cards for -CURRENT

2000-02-03 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Kenneth D. Merry had to walk into mine and say: > > [ Thanks for the info Bill! ] No problemo. [...] > > Both the Alteon and SysKonnect NICs are 64-bit PCI cards. (Actually, I'm > > pretty sure all of the PCI gigabit NICs are 64-bit.)

bug in vn, a pnaic and how to debug modules (was Re: open ref counts in CAM and vn)

2000-02-03 Thread Guido van Rooij
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 10:05:22AM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > The reference counting should be handled by PHK's disk layer (which sits > above CAM), and the da driver's close routine should only get called on > final close. ok. > > I don't know about the vn device, though. > That was