Servers with large amounts of RAM?

2000-02-10 Thread Michael R. Wayne
Is there a good reference URL for configuring FreeBSD with large amounts of RAM? I seem to remember there being "issues" with over 1GB but I don't remember the details and the search engine on www.freebsd.org is currently down. /\/\ \/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "un

My views on Eclipse/BSD

2000-02-10 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Since everyone seems to be jumping up and down on this, I thought I'd just chime in with my two cents on the matter. I saw the Lucent folks behind this when they first brought a demo of Eclipse to FreeBSDCon '99 and, frankly, I was just pleased that they were willing to show up as exhibitors and

Re: ls: alpha - numeric sorting

2000-02-10 Thread Chris Costello
On Friday, February 11, 2000, W.H.Scholten wrote: > I've also attached a complete little test program with debug output etc. > The code could be improved by renaming some variables to longer names > (couldn't think of any good ones ;) and probably the implementation too > (haven't tried to optimiz

ls: alpha - numeric sorting

2000-02-10 Thread W.H.Scholten
L.S. Here are patches for FreeBSD's ls (from version 3.3 release) and OpenBSD's ls (version 2.6, didn't actually test this obsd patch as I'm working on a FreeBSD machine at the moment). What it does is add an option (yes another one) to sort alpha & numeric separately, i.e. instead of something

Re: Eclipse/BSD

2000-02-10 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+[ Giorgos Keramidas ]- | On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:56:09PM -0500, Colin wrote: | > | > As interesting as this looks, unfortunately the license it comes with | > efffectively precludes incorporating it into FreeBSD. The license is | > for single-u

Re: Eclipse/BSD

2000-02-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:56:09PM -0500, Colin wrote: > > As interesting as this looks, unfortunately the license it comes with > efffectively precludes incorporating it into FreeBSD. The license is > for single-user non-commercial only. They also included derivative > works in the restriction

Re: Disposable PCs?

2000-02-10 Thread Wes Peters
"Potts, Ross" wrote: > > Some people don't like embedded HTML mail, especially if they aren't using > something that uses it, such as Netscape. Cutting and pasting is just as easy. > Personally, I like the idea of using links in mail. I just decided to go for > the lowest common denominator. T

Re: Disposable PCs?

2000-02-10 Thread Ben Smithurst
Potts, Ross wrote: > Some people don't like embedded HTML mail, especially if they aren't > using something that uses it, such as Netscape. Cutting and pasting > is just as easy. uh... I think Wes just meant post the complete URL (actually, that's what he said), i.e. stick http:// on the front

Re: T1 / E1 PCI card for FreeBSD?

2000-02-10 Thread Archie Cobbs
Louis A. Mamakos writes: > > What we are looking for is just 30 x 64 kbit incoming ISDN channels for > > remote access to Internet. "remote access concentrator". > > > > >channels. Some of them might be combined with others to provide Nx64kb/s > > > > I see the Portmaster 3 can bond channels

Re: IPFW / IP Filter question

2000-02-10 Thread Archie Cobbs
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai writes: > >I would have thought you would use the tee option in ipfw for this, but > >its not implemented yet according to my man pages, so I was wondering if > >there was another way to do this, cause it makes traffic analysis a hell > >of a lot easier if I can do this rath

RE: Disposable PCs?

2000-02-10 Thread Potts, Ross
Some people don't like embedded HTML mail, especially if they aren't using something that uses it, such as Netscape. Cutting and pasting is just as easy. Personally, I like the idea of using links in mail. I just decided to go for the lowest common denominator. -Original Message

Re: T1 / E1 PCI card for FreeBSD?

2000-02-10 Thread Louis A. Mamakos
> Hi Louie, > > >You've got to look at what you're actually getting as a delivered capability. > > What we are looking for is just 30 x 64 kbit incoming ISDN channels for > remote access to Internet. "remote access concentrator". > > >channels. Some of them might be combined with others to p

Re: T1 / E1 PCI card for FreeBSD?

2000-02-10 Thread Len Conrad
Hi Louie, >You've got to look at what you're actually getting as a delivered capability. What we are looking for is just 30 x 64 kbit incoming ISDN channels for remote access to Internet. "remote access concentrator". >channels. Some of them might be combined with others to provide Nx64kb/s

Re: T1 / E1 PCI card for FreeBSD?

2000-02-10 Thread Louis A. Mamakos
> Len Conrad wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tells me their P1200 E1 card, with FreeBSD drive, can't > > work in channelized mode (like the etinc cards can't). Their LMC150xM > > cards can do channelized, but don't have a FreeBSD driver, but their > > FreeBSD guy is looking at it. > > > > Any

Re: T1 / E1 PCI card for FreeBSD?

2000-02-10 Thread Wes Peters
Len Conrad wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tells me their P1200 E1 card, with FreeBSD drive, can't > work in channelized mode (like the etinc cards can't). Their LMC150xM > cards can do channelized, but don't have a FreeBSD driver, but their > FreeBSD guy is looking at it. > > Any hacker care to e

Re: Bad memory suspected

2000-02-10 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
Hi, Note that this was a Cyrix 686 M-266 which should have a native/real clockspeed of 200Mhz After trying all kinds of permutations of: voltage clockspeed caches and multiplier It has become clear: the CPU doesn't really care for 2.9 or 2.8 volt But it really does