Hail!
Is raid5 in vinum officially broken in 4.x branch?
I can't get stable system (make buildworld at least) on both
ata+(dual celeron) and ahc(7896)+(dual PIII). OS still hangs while
'make buildworld' on raid5 volume proceed.
"vinum raid5-panic tentitive patch" by Matt Dillon doesn't
Ming Zhang wrote:
Is there a MT-safe implementation of gethostbyname() in FreeBSD (3.4/4.0)?
On Solaris there is gethostbyname_r(). Calling gethostbyname() with in
two threads cause both threads to block.
I know the "struct hostent" is static in gethostbyname(), however it seems
like
On Sunday, 16 April 2000 at 11:02:45 +0400, Alex Zakirov wrote:
Hail!
Is raid5 in vinum officially broken in 4.x branch?
Not completely. We have a number of problems which only show up in
some configurations.
I can't get stable system (make buildworld at least) on both
ata+(dual
I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
questions:
1. The data must be absolutely present at all times, no page
faults or locking mechanisms, etc. Does that mean
I should use kmem_alloc_wired() or am I misunderstanding its purpose?
Does it make sense to alloc less than a
It seems Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
Of course, with all those new keys on all those keyboards, we should
perhaps think about whether to add all of them as new keycodes,
and if so, in which order, etc. I've no idea if FreeBSD's concept
of 'keycode' (i.e. key number independent of keyboard model)
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I have two unrelated questions I can not figure out myself:
(2) I am trying to display kernel profiling sysctl variables with sysctl
-a or sysctl -A without success. They are defined in subr_prof.c. Why
sysctl command can not display them? I can
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anatoly Vorobey writes
:
I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
questions:
How much is "a lot" ?
1. The data must be absolutely present at all times, no page
faults or locking mechanisms, etc. Does that mean
I should use kmem_alloc_wired() or
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrzej B
ialecki writes:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I have two unrelated questions I can not figure out myself:
(2) I am trying to display kernel profiling sysctl variables with sysctl
-a or sysctl -A without success. They are defined in
On Sun, Apr 16, 2000 at 03:36:31PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anatoly Vorobey writes
:
I have to malloc a lot of memory in the kernel, hence a few
questions:
How much is "a lot" ?
Apparently somewhere in the vicinity of 8Mb, and also coming in a form
of
I notice that the IDEA code in OpenSSL is in the Attic and not in
the regular source tree. I know that OpenSSL is compiled with
something like -DNO_IDEA by default, but that doesn't mean IDEA
shouldn't be in the source tree for people who can use it. Would
it be possible to get idea reinstated
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Soren Schmidt writes:
: I modelled them after SCO UNIX 3.2 way back when, I know that upto
: some point I kept the keymaps compatible to SCO's, but I think that
: got broken since
I don't think SCO does these new keys. If I do anything in this area,
I'll check
: Hail!
:
:Is raid5 in vinum officially broken in 4.x branch?
:I can't get stable system (make buildworld at least) on both
:ata+(dual celeron) and ahc(7896)+(dual PIII). OS still hangs while
:'make buildworld' on raid5 volume proceed.
:
:"vinum raid5-panic tentitive patch" by Matt Dillon
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I have two unrelated questions I can not figure out myself:
(1) Does FreeBSD NFS implementation support "noac" to disable attribute
cache? I know this is not good for performance.
It seems to me that FreeBSD does not have the mount option
On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, David Malone wrote:
I notice that the IDEA code in OpenSSL is in the Attic and not in
the regular source tree. I know that OpenSSL is compiled with
something like -DNO_IDEA by default, but that doesn't mean IDEA
shouldn't be in the source tree for people who can use it.
(According to Applied Cryptography, IDEA is free for non-comercial
use. As the source code is being distributed via cvs anyway, I
can't see a reason why it isn't being included in any of the
branches.)
I was under the impression it was restricted (patented) in the US and in
some parts
15 matches
Mail list logo
