Re: why isnt there a ext2fs.ko ?

2000-07-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Jul-00 James Howard wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Maxime Henrion wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I was wondering why the kernel module for ext2fs doesnt exist. I >> think this will be very useful because a lot of linux users come to >> FreeBSD and want to mount their existing linux

Re: ls -G seems to depend on TERM=xterm-color

2000-07-03 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Jul-00 Doug Barton wrote: > Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Sean Lutner wrote: >> >> > I'm experiencing the same thing. ls --color doesn't seem to work for me >> > unless like Doug, I set TERM=xterm-color. >> >> That's because the "color" escape sequences are d

Re: invlpg produces strange sig11 on PentiumPro box

2000-07-03 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > If it's something that can be done as eg. a KLD > > > we might want to do that instead, or through some other mechanism for > > > handling these sort of CPU quirks. > > > > It so

RE: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

2000-07-03 Thread Nick Evans
Title: RE: BPF and Promiscuous Mode Exactly, I just tried it and it didn't work :(.  Yes you are right on, NFR is a sniffer/ids, but it is based on the OpenBSD kernel and therefore does not support multiple processors. I just tried bridging and it does in fact bridge all interfaces together, b

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Coleman Kane
Yeah, change the /usr/bin/test in soffice to /bin/test. BSD has test in /bin. Wes Peters had the audacity to say: > Coleman Kane wrote: > > > > Naw, man. Ports are necessary. > > > > They sure are: > > wes@homer$ /usr/local/office52/program > bash: /usr/local/office52/program: is a directory

Re: /etc/security -> /etc/periodic/security ?

2000-07-03 Thread James Howard
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Umm, which knobs? I added the only two options the security stuff currently > uses, what else does it need? For each script under /etc/periodic/{daily,weekly,monthly}/, there is a knob in /etc/defaults/periodic. This controls whether the script is run

Re: SCSI HBA device detection?

2000-07-03 Thread Nat Lanza
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If this is meant to be an exercise in writing a CAM HBA driver, then you > need to teach your disk-emulation code about the basic SCSI commands > (INQUIRY, TEST UNIT READY, etc). The SCSI infrastructure will use these > commands to automatically detect

Re: Concurrent access to SMbus

2000-07-03 Thread Mike Smith
> I notice that the /dev/smbX devices are exclusive access. This makes > it impossible to run two (or more) programs concurrently that want > to talk to SMbus devices (in my case, healthd and lmmon, both of which > want to open /dev/smb0 to access the LM78). > > Is this an SMbus restriction, or a

Re: APM problems on NEC Versa 2000C

2000-07-03 Thread Mike Smith
> I have an older 486 laptop which is newly running FreeBSD > 4.0-RELEASE. When I attempted to enable APM and reboot, I got the > following on my screen: > > --begin screen-- > Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode > instruction pointer = 0x58:0x337 > stack pointer

Re: invlpg produces strange sig11 on PentiumPro box

2000-07-03 Thread Mike Smith
> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If it's something that can be done as eg. a KLD > > we might want to do that instead, or through some other mechanism for > > handling these sort of CPU quirks. > > It sounds good. If binary-format quriks is supported, we c

Re: /etc/security -> /etc/periodic/security ?

2000-07-03 Thread Ben Smithurst
James Howard wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > >> Try the attached. They haven't been thoroughly tested, but that's what >> -CURRENT is for, right? :-) I even remembered to update the manual page >> this time... > > This needs to have knobs and stuff located in /etc/defaults

Re: SCSI HBA device detection?

2000-07-03 Thread Mike Smith
> I'm writing a SCSI HBA driver that simulates a bus with some > ramdisk-backed disks attached to it. I've read through the HBA > tutorial in Daemon News, but I'm still unsure how to tell the system > about my pretend disk devices. I suspect part of the problem is that > I don't actually have real

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Wes Peters
Coleman Kane wrote: > > Naw, man. Ports are necessary. > > Michael Lucas had the audacity to say: > > > I did not have time to work out what's failing, but it should be easy > > > to reproduce (start the installer with an option, hmmm, think it was > > > /net, can't check, since I'm away from th

Re: dev to name

2000-07-03 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris Costello writes: : On Sunday, July 02, 2000, Fox Anderson wrote: : > Hi. : > How can i find out the name of device file by device major/minor? : :The devtoname() function. ``man devtoname'' This is a kernel only function. The only way to do it in user l

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Coleman Kane
You should be using the linux_base package. The linux_lib were removed after rh 5.2. I did this on 5.0-C. Ollivier Robert had the audacity to say: > According to Coleman Kane: > > I d/l'd from Sun and it installed without a hitch. It is a hell of a lot > > faster than 5.1 and they've gotten rid

Re: uncool MO disk problems, addendum

2000-07-03 Thread Gérard Roudier
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, W.H.Scholten wrote: > L.s. > > small addendum: > - it's fbsd 3.3R on i386 as you may have guesssed from the mail headers. > - I use the new fbsd symbios/ncr scsi driver (the README says latest > revision is sym-0.12.0-19991127). The README file hasn't been maintained up to

Re: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

2000-07-03 Thread Nick Rogness
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 03), Nick Evans said: > > How do I set an interface in promiscous mode permanently? In Linux > > it's simply ifconfig PROMISC. Is there something similar > > in BSD? Is it somekind of sysctl command? Stupid Man's Answer:

Re: /etc/security -> /etc/periodic/security ?

2000-07-03 Thread James Howard
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Try the attached. They haven't been thoroughly tested, but that's what > -CURRENT is for, right? :-) I even remembered to update the manual page > this time... This needs to have knobs and stuff located in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf Also, it would b

Re: Global variables defined several times.

2000-07-03 Thread David Malone
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: > >I've just noticed that usr.bin/ftp/ftp_var.h defines a large > >selection of global variables, and then this header file is included > >in multiple C source files. > > > >I thought this should lead to one copy of the global varible per > >s

Re: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

2000-07-03 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 03), Nick Evans said: > I'm trying to use IPFilter's copying functions to make a load > balancer, I have traffic being mirrored from a router to one > interface on the BSD box, and for some reason the only time netstat > reports any traffic on that interface is when tcpdum

Re: Global variables defined several times.

2000-07-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: >I've just noticed that usr.bin/ftp/ftp_var.h defines a large >selection of global variables, and then this header file is included >in multiple C source files. > >I thought this should lead to one copy of the global varible per >source file, an

Global variables defined several times.

2000-07-03 Thread David Malone
I've just noticed that usr.bin/ftp/ftp_var.h defines a large selection of global variables, and then this header file is included in multiple C source files. I thought this should lead to one copy of the global varible per source file, and then a warning or error at link time due to symbols being

Re: BPF and Promiscuous Mode

2000-07-03 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jul 03), Nick Evans said: > How do I set an interface in promiscous mode permanently? In Linux > it's simply ifconfig PROMISC. Is there something similar > in BSD? Is it somekind of sysctl command? The only code that fiddles with the promisc bit is bridging and bpf, so the o

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Fumerola writes: >I'd love to have FreeBSD be able to reclaim memory quicker at the sacrifice >of a few cpu cycles. Why? Well, the "add more memory" arguement doesn't work >well when I get DoS attacks that will eat any memory available because they >can connec

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 03:20:22PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > Considering the prominence of DoS attacks and similar, I think it > > makes a lot of sense to be able to free the memory again, and if > > the hysteresis you have built in means that there is no measurable > > performance impact I

Re: style(9)

2000-07-03 Thread Greg Black
Wes Peters writes: > Or simply get a wider editor. Seriously. Writing code in 80 columns is > an anachronism. No it's not. It's a widely-accepted fact that humans have difficulty reading lines with more than about 70 characters in them -- this difficulty increases with age (and is probably al

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Considering the prominence of DoS attacks and similar, I think it > makes a lot of sense to be able to free the memory again, and if > the hysteresis you have built in means that there is no measurable > performance impact I think you will face no o

BPF and Promiscuous Mode

2000-07-03 Thread Nick Evans
Title: BPF and Promiscuous Mode How do I set an interface in promiscous mode permanently? In Linux it's simply ifconfig PROMISC. Is there something similar in BSD? Is it somekind of sysctl command? thx. -- nick.evans network.engineering NextVenue, In

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, B osko Milekic writes: > When I posted the initial diff, I provided such data. I'll repeat: a > good example is at: http://24.201.62.9/stats/mbuf.html Considering the prominence of DoS attacks and similar, I think it makes a lot of sense to be able to free

Re: Monitoring modem for dialing

2000-07-03 Thread Zach N. Heilig
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 12:12:09AM -0700, bow wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if someone could point me in the right direction on how > to monitor my modem to capture dialing. > > Basically I have an extra cordless phone around the house, and I wanted > to know if it was possible to hook it

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, David Greenman wrote: >What I'm doing is challenging your assertions that spending CPU cycles to > save memory in the networking code is the right thing to do. I'm further > saying that I have direct experiance in this area since I'm one of the primary > people in FreeBSD

Keyboard programming - help!

2000-07-03 Thread Dinesh Nadarajah
Hi: I am new to freeBSD and I would like to get some advice/recommendation regarding keyboard programming. I am trying to port FREEBSD to one of the Indian languages (and could possiblely be used for many of them) and so I would like to find out how to program the keyboard to accept key sequences

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jeroen C. van Gelderen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000703 08:52] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Sacrificing performance to fix the small occurances where > > this is not the case is not worth it, the general case will always > > be there and will be more important. > > You seem to imply that

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Coleman Kane: > I d/l'd from Sun and it installed without a hitch. It is a hell of a lot > faster than 5.1 and they've gotten rid of some of the crapisms. On 5.0-CURRENT or 4-STABLE ? With which linux_lib port ? I tried on my 5.0-CURRENT with the latest linux_lib (from RedHate 6.1) a

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Christoph Sold
Michael Lucas wrote: > > > I did not have time to work out what's failing, but it should be easy > > to reproduce (start the installer with an option, hmmm, think it was > > /net, can't check, since I'm away from that system ...) > > Yep. Run the installer as root with the /net option, and pu

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Stephen Hocking
Just tried it - seems to work fine, although the soffice script needs one small mod to take account of the fact that test is /bin/test. Stephen -- The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor. "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Coleman Kane
Naw, man. Ports are necessary. Michael Lucas had the audacity to say: > > I did not have time to work out what's failing, but it should be easy > > to reproduce (start the installer with an option, hmmm, think it was > > /net, can't check, since I'm away from that system ...) > > Yep. Run the i

IPsec tunnels with dynamic addresses

2000-07-03 Thread Samuel Tardieu
The current situation: I have some machines with static IP addresses, and some other ones with dynamic IP addresses, permanently connected or not. What I would like: establish IPsec tunnels between a machine with a static IP and a machine with a dynamic one. The former solution I used: pipsecd,

uncool MO disk problems, addendum

2000-07-03 Thread W.H.Scholten
L.s. small addendum: - it's fbsd 3.3R on i386 as you may have guesssed from the mail headers. - I use the new fbsd symbios/ncr scsi driver (the README says latest revision is sym-0.12.0-19991127). Also my mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], reply on the previous mail will give spaces in the mail

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Jeroen C. van Gelderen
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * David Greenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000703 01:32] wrote: > > .. response to mbuf rewrite > > >I'm not trying to 'frown upon evolution', unless the particular form of > > evolution is to make the software worse than it was. I *can* be convinced > > that your pro

uncool MO disk problems

2000-07-03 Thread W.H.Scholten
L.S. (the following is on fbsd 3.3 R) I tried use 2048 bytes/sector MO media recently, but it doesn't work. Disklabel complains about /boot/boot2 being to large or something. It seems to have worked (more or less) up until 3.1 as I saw a few posts in the SCSI list, e.g. > From: "Kenneth D. Merr

Re: Monitoring modem for dialing

2000-07-03 Thread Ted Buswell
bow writes: > Basically I have an extra cordless phone around the house, and I wanted > to know if it was possible to hook it into my modem and then have an > application monitor the modem for dialing, then do something depending > on what was dialed... To give an example, I'm running xmms to

Re: ls -G seems to depend on TERM=xterm-color

2000-07-03 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 12:10:13AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > > That's because the "color" escape sequences are defined for xterm-color > > in termcap; xterm-color is defined as a superset of xterm (see the tc= > > directive). > > Right... I am down w

Re: why isnt there a ext2fs.ko ?

2000-07-03 Thread James Howard
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Maxime Henrion wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was wondering why the kernel module for ext2fs doesnt exist. I > think this will be very useful because a lot of linux users come to > FreeBSD and want to mount their existing linux partitions, and they have > to recompile th

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Michael Lucas
> I did not have time to work out what's failing, but it should be easy > to reproduce (start the installer with an option, hmmm, think it was > /net, can't check, since I'm away from that system ...) Yep. Run the installer as root with the /net option, and put it under, say, /usr/local/office52

why isnt there a ext2fs.ko ?

2000-07-03 Thread Maxime Henrion
Hi guys, I was wondering why the kernel module for ext2fs doesnt exist. I think this will be very useful because a lot of linux users come to FreeBSD and want to mount their existing linux partitions, and they have to recompile their kernel. This isn't a hard task, but it's a bit disa

Re: Anyone tried StarOffice 5.2 yet?

2000-07-03 Thread Stefan Esser
On 2000-07-03 00:26 -0400, Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I d/l'd from Sun and it installed without a hitch. It is a hell of a lot > faster than 5.1 and they've gotten rid of some of the crapisms. I didn't try to do any actual work with it, but I noticed that while the direct installat

Re: Drivers

2000-07-03 Thread Mohana Krishna Penumetcha
hi, In an ealier mail some one has sent a list of suggested reading for device drivers(none of them are specific to FreeBSD). i found unix device drivers by george pajari very useful. the methodology i followed is to read a chapter from that book and read the FreeBSD sources for simillar device

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* David Greenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000703 01:32] wrote: .. response to mbuf rewrite >I'm not trying to 'frown upon evolution', unless the particular form of > evolution is to make the software worse than it was. I *can* be convinced > that your proposed changes are a good thing and I'm as

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Greenman writes: >> I'm getting the unfortunate impression that evolution is being >> frowned upon here. Are their other people that frown the proposal out >> there to this extent? (i.e. "don't change it if it works") I'd like to >> hear some important

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread David Greenman
> I'm getting the unfortunate impression that evolution is being > frowned upon here. Are their other people that frown the proposal out > there to this extent? (i.e. "don't change it if it works") I'd like to > hear some important voices on this issue so that I can decide whether to > j

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bosko Milekic writes: > I'm getting the unfortunate impression that evolution is being > frowned upon here. Are their other people that frown the proposal out > there to this extent? (i.e. "don't change it if it works") I'd like to > hear some important v

Drivers

2000-07-03 Thread nick
Hi folks! I was wondering if someone could point me in the right direction on how to write device drivers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: mbuf re-write(s), v 0.1

2000-07-03 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, David Greenman wrote: >Yes, malloc is slow for other reasons, but it is especially slow when VM > pages are freed back to the general pool. Of course it is possible to > introduce hysteresis in the algorithm such that it doesn't free the pages as > often, but this (and al

Re: ls -G seems to depend on TERM=xterm-color

2000-07-03 Thread Doug Barton
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Sean Lutner wrote: > > > I'm experiencing the same thing. ls --color doesn't seem to work for me > > unless like Doug, I set TERM=xterm-color. > > That's because the "color" escape sequences are defined for xterm-color > in termcap; xterm