Joy Ganguly wrote:
> i have a L440GX+ intel server motherboard running 2 P3. The motherboard
> has an on-board scsi controller aic7896 (ahc0, ahc1). Additionally i
> have added an "Adaptec 3950 scsi controller" board(ahc2, ahc3). When i
> boot an uniprocessor kernel everything works fine. However
Try doing it again. Signall 11 usually means you have bad ram in your
computer and usually fails randomly, so if you type make install it might
progress further. If you still cannot complete, try replacing ram with
known good ram.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Frederik Meerwaldt wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'
Alan Edmonds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I hate to disagree but my setup loads pxeboot from /tftpboot (as per
> the tftp line in inetd.conf) and my DHCP options specify the root fs as
> /pxeroot. pxeboot loads /boot/loader.rc from /pxeroot. It's confusing
> I know. It also appears to load /pxe
Geez, with all that info, I'll get right on a patch. sometimes too much
information can be a bad thing man.
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Frederik Meerwaldt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently discovered a bug in the StarOffice5 Port, and so I can't
> install it.
> [frederik@server frederik]$ uname -a
>
I hate to disagree but my setup loads pxeboot
from /tftpboot (as per the tftp line in inetd.conf)
and my DHCP options specify the root fs as /pxeroot.
pxeboot loads /boot/loader.rc from /pxeroot. It's
confusing I know. It also appears to load /pxeboot
via tftp and /boot/loader.rc via NFS. Mayb
> We're trying to create a high availability FreeBSD
> cluster with a standby machine being able to take over for a
> failed host
I'm about to be in a similar situation and was planning a gratuitous ARP. It
seems a lot easier than attempting to take over the MAC adddress. Any
comments?
Dave
why it's not possible to suspend SCSI drives like the ATA/IDE ones ?
I'm not talking about camcontrol suspend feature. if you have a mounted
filesystem, and access a file onto that filesystem while the drive is
suspended in this manner, the system gives up. and it is not so good
(at all :) to do
On 10-Jul-00 Alan Edmonds wrote:
> Mike Smith wrote:
>> > 1) not probe for a console
>>
>> Nothing probes for a console, apart from boot2 in the boot-from-disk case
>> if the -P flag is found in /boot.config.
>
> Okay. Maybe I used the word probe incorrectly. As I understand
> pxeboot (and lo
Alan Edmonds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Except if pxeboot can't read loader.rc you could be hosed.
> Since pxeboot is loaded over the network, you might not
> be able to mount the root fs and read /boot/loader.rc.
> I was just trying to set the default case to assume serial console
> like you ca
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Restating the question.
> >
> > Is there a way to force PXE to
>
> I think you have some very serious confusion about what things are and
> what they are called, and it is making it impossible for anyone else to
> understand what you're talking about.
>
> "PXE" is a spe
Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
>
> > They can't be in the same collision domain -- the only way to do that
> > is to have an Ethernet repeater which repeats bit by bit fron one
> > segment to another, and propagating a collision on one segment as a
> > jam on
> Restating the question.
>
> Is there a way to force PXE to
I think you have some very serious confusion about what things are and
what they are called, and it is making it impossible for anyone else to
understand what you're talking about.
"PXE" is a specification, and an interface complian
hi all,
i have a L440GX+ intel server motherboard running 2 P3. The motherboard
has an on-board scsi controller aic7896 (ahc0, ahc1). Additionally i
have added an "Adaptec 3950 scsi controller" board(ahc2, ahc3). When i
boot an uniprocessor kernel everything works fine. However when i boot a
mu
Restating the question.
Is there a way to force PXE to
1) not probe for a console
2) use a serial port as the default com port
I know I can put set console="comconsole" in /boot/loader.rc.
Normally, this is set in the boot blocks, but we don't
have these in pxeboot.
Thanks,
--
Alan Edmonds
Doug Ambrisko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Paul Saab writes:
> | set console="comconsole" is what you want in /boot/loader.rc
>
> Yep, except that it doesn't initialize the com port, it just starts
> using it so you end up with junk out the port. However, if you have a
> BIOS that setups the bau
> Paul Saab writes:
> | set console="comconsole" is what you want in /boot/loader.rc
>
> Yep, except that it doesn't initialize the com port, it just starts
> using it so you end up with junk out the port. However, if you have a
> BIOS that setups the baud rate etc. of the serial port then you w
> Hello all,
>
> This issue was discussed last year, but I can't find any information on
> a resolution. We're trying to create a high availability FreeBSD
> cluster with a standby machine being able to take over for a failed host,
> and need the standby machine to have its own MAC address, plus
Paul Saab writes:
| set console="comconsole" is what you want in /boot/loader.rc
Yep, except that it doesn't initialize the com port, it just starts
using it so you end up with junk out the port. However, if you have a
BIOS that setups the baud rate etc. of the serial port then you would
be okay
Alan Edmonds writes:
|
| I'm playing with PXE and pxeboot. I have a question about
| setting the serial console option. The PC BIOS reports
| 'No Keyboard Present', but when PXE boots, BTX reports
| console as internal keyboard/video. So, I'm looking at
| hard coding a serial console into BT
set console="comconsole" is what you want in /boot/loader.rc
paul
Alan Edmonds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I'm playing with PXE and pxeboot. I have a question about
> setting the serial console option. The PC BIOS reports
> 'No Keyboard Present', but when PXE boots, BTX reports
> console
Narvi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [i think this might just as well belong in -questions]
>
> On 10 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I'm 18-year-old newbie UNIX programmer that currently use
> > FreeBSD and is really thankfull of it.I run it on DUAL PII/333.
> >
> > Some days ago my fri
hi all,
i have a L440GX+ intel server motherboard running 2 P3. The motherboard
has an on-board scsi controller aic7896 (ahc0, ahc1). Additionally i
have added an "Adaptec 3950 scsi controller" board(ahc2, ahc3). When i
boot an uniprocessor kernel everything works fine. However when i boot a
mul
I'm playing with PXE and pxeboot. I have a question about
setting the serial console option. The PC BIOS reports
'No Keyboard Present', but when PXE boots, BTX reports
console as internal keyboard/video. So, I'm looking at
hard coding a serial console into BTX. Normally, you
put the -h opti
> From: Frederik Meerwaldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've recently discovered a bug in the StarOffice5 Port, and so I can't
> install it.
cc'd to list in case some other don't know ports procedure ...
List[EMAIL PROTECTED] is Not for discussing ports
[EMAIL PROTECTED]is for
theres a mailing list group on the net (s3linux) that may be able to help.
Although, If I where U I would get rid of that card. Any S3 card after the
ViRGE & Trio chipsets SUCK!!!
-cosmic-665
P.S. Sorry if I have affended anyone :(
>-On [2710 03:10], Yonny Cardenas
Recent threads (by subject) on related topics are,
Implementing ioctl to set MAC address -- question.
ifconfig: changing mac address
Neither discusses supporting multiple MAC addresses, but rather explicitly
setting the MAC address in a failover condition.
It appears that Bill P
> This DoS is probably as old as you are. :) Setting proper limits on
Older. I did this back in the spring of 1977 at Reed College (v6/PWB)- after
beating me up for crashing the system, they gave me superuser privileges so
that if I did something like it again *I* could then spend the two hours
Please, this is not a topic for arch. While I appreciate the author's
intent, it is indeed "old news", well known and for which we have a
specific set of solutions.
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_DES: Th
[i think this might just as well belong in -questions]
On 10 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm 18-year-old newbie UNIX programmer that currently use
> FreeBSD and is really thankfull of it.I run it on DUAL PII/333.
>
> Some days ago my friend tell me that with simple user righ
Hi all,
I've recently discovered a bug in the StarOffice5 Port, and so I can't
install it.
[frederik@server frederik]$ uname -a
FreeBSD server.wes.mee.com 5.0-2521-CURRENT FreeBSD
5.0-2521-CURRENT #2: Sun Jun 18 20:46:35 CEST 2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/server i386
Plea
Hello all,
This issue was discussed last year, but I can't find any information on
a resolution. We're trying to create a high availability FreeBSD
cluster with a standby machine being able to take over for a failed host,
and need the standby machine to have its own MAC address, plus the MAC
add
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Well, IMHO I think something like this implemented in the kernel for
> the reasons given above would let people write bad code.
Yup, that clinches it for me. You're right. This would have fallen
more into the catagory of "bad program design fix" rathe
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000, Paul Herman wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000, Paul Herman wrote:
> > > Perhaps a discussion of something like FORK_RATELIMIT along the lines
> > > of ICMP_BANDLIM is in order?
> >
> > why would you do that? If something wants t
-On [2709 18:45], Jim Mercer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>hmmm. maybe, /usr/share/examples/cvsup/... should be updated to reflect the
>change.
Should be updated. Patience grasshopper. =P
>also, i noticed something odd on the mailing-list search pages of the website:
>
>search "cvs-crypto" f
-On [2710 03:10], Yonny Cardenas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I have a problem with my (Diamond Stealth III) AGP
>video card,it only works
>in 320x204 resolution:
>
>This menssage is showed when I run X:
>
>SVGA: PCI: S3 Savage4 rev.4, Memory @ 0xf800,
>0xf000
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000, Paul Herman wrote:
> > Perhaps a discussion of something like FORK_RATELIMIT along the lines
> > of ICMP_BANDLIM is in order?
>
> why would you do that? If something wants to fork, let it fork. When
> it hits the upper limit defin
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000, Paul Herman wrote:
> On 10 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Some days ago my friend tell me that with simple user rights
> > and whit only 1 line of code he could crash my machine. I laught
> > but he did it :(.
> >
> > What he wrote was ' int main(void) {while(1) fork
On 10 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Some days ago my friend tell me that with simple user rights
> and whit only 1 line of code he could crash my machine. I laught
> but he did it :(.
>
> What he wrote was ' int main(void) {while(1) fork(); }' compiled it
> and run it. Within a second /kern
On 10 xxx -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What he wrote was ' int main(void) {while(1) fork(); }' compiled it
> and run it. Within a second /kernel said "proc: table is full" and
> died. I tried this on some other BSD unixes and the result was
> same.
A fork() bomb... Resource exhaustion. Old
Hello
I'm 18-year-old newbie UNIX programmer that currently use
FreeBSD and is really thankfull of it.I run it on DUAL PII/333.
Some days ago my friend tell me that with simple user rights
and whit only 1 line of code he could crash my machine. I laught
but he did it :(.
What he wrote was ' i
40 matches
Mail list logo
