Hi, all.
Is there anybody interested in AMD x86-64 architecture? I think we
should take a look at this.
http://www.x86-64.org/
- Jung-uk Kim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Just looking in /sys/netinet and I see this:
(freefall:~/src/sys/netinet) grep 'inetsw' *.c | grep protosw
in_proto.c:struct ipprotosw inetsw[] = {
in_proto.c: (struct protosw *)inetsw,
in_proto.c: (struct protosw *)&inetsw[sizeof(inetsw)/sizeof(inetsw[0])], 0,
ip_fil.c:extern struct
> > (I just checked - it worked!)
>
> Now we just need someone with a NetBSD box handy to let us know whether
> double-escaping the newlines works alright there. I have a feeling
> it won't, which probably means we need to see if we can fix our
> implementation of __IDSTRING().
Bah.
Only three
Nicolas Leonard wrote:
>
> Sorry, I wasn't precise enough .
>
> In fact, I caught the SIGABRT signal (and the others signals which are
> ending the program) and I'm doing some ending stuff, and after that, I
> would like to dump a core file.
>
> I could remove the handler of SIGABRT after my e
> > Did your _exact_ sample program fail on NetBSD in the same way that
> > it failed on FreeBSD?
>
> No. A sufficiently similar program also fails on FreeBSD but does not
> fail on NetBSD. :-)
OK - we need to see the assembler output that is generated on both
boxes;
Can you get a comparitive
> I'm not trying to protect the way I do it, since I don't use the macro
> myself. I just want to make sure that, if the NetBSD behaviour
> (handling embedded newlines properly) is correct, that we provide a
> compatible interface.
>
> Am I missing something here?
Maybe I am.
Did your _exact_
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >Here's a simple test-and-set function for the 386 (tested and works):
> Actually, this isn't particularly good coding. It isn't SMP-safe.
you caught me! I'm a lousy assembly programmer!
Actually, that code is so old it predates SMP by a bit ...
Alphred Perlstein wrote:
> Using sysctls is probably the easiest way of doing it.
I am so stupid, Alphred, I did not think sysctl's could be used to
provide access to arrays. I should have looked more.
Chuck Robey wrote:
>Occaisonally, but you'd do better hitting this list in general. I'm on
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:25:14 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> ...and it does not like the multi-line string. You may need to
> double-escape the \n's (like \\n) to get them into the .ident
> line symbolically.
>
> (I just checked - it worked!)
Now we just need someone with a NetBSD box handy to le
> And please don't whine about me about string concatenation -- it's legal
> in ANSI C. :-)
__COPYRIGHT is defined as
#define __COPYRIGHT(s) __IDSTRING(copyright,s)
and __IDSTRING is
#define __IDSTRING(name,string) __asm__(".ident\t\"" string "\"")
By the time the string makes it to the asse
OK, so it might very well be that I haven't read everything; in that
case, sorry for taking your time. However..
/etc/fstab:
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass#
/dev/ad4s1b noneswapsw 0 0
/dev/ad4s1a
i don't know assembler, but it the macros are like C, you
need a \ at the end of the line :). (IIRC)
Lemme know if that fixes it :).
Thanks,
---
| Daryl Chance | BIT: n. unit by which |
| Valuedata, LLC | programmers go insane |
---
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:58:11 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> Bah.
>
> Only three things use __COPYRIGHT; ftp(d?), routed and make. None of them
> use \n's like you do.
I'm not trying to protect the way I do it, since I don't use the macro
myself. I just want to make sure that, if the NetBSD beha
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 19:47:52 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> /usr/n/ringrowl/root -maproot=root -network 192.168.1.0 -mask 255.255.255.0
> /usr/n/ringrowl/usr -maproot=root -network 192.168.1.0 -mask 255.255.255.0
>
> And the result of ``mountd -d -l'' is:
>
> Aug 16 19:36:35 ringwraith mo
hi
We are running freebsd 3.3 release.
i am having the scenario where two daemons running on
two routers which are on the same LAN have to exchange
multicast packets. To test the multicasting
capability, i have taken 2 sample programs. Both of
them are joining same multicast group and there
[...]
> I'm led to believe that these error messages are not present on a NetBSD
> box. So is this broken usage of __COPYRIGHT(), or is this pre-processor
> or assembler breakage?
Looks like breakage of the ELF __IDSTRING macro.
#if defined(__GNUC__) && defined(__ELF__)
#define __IDSTRING(nam
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 22:09:02 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> Maybe I am.
>
> Did your _exact_ sample program fail on NetBSD in the same way that
> it failed on FreeBSD?
No. A sufficiently similar program also fails on FreeBSD but does not
fail on NetBSD. :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: sen
Munehiro Matsuda wrote:
>
> Hello Joseph,
>
> From: Joseph Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[...]
> ::> Aha, Dell Inspiron 7500!
> ::> There was some extra stuff in the Linux driver for it.
> ::> I have recreated my patch (mstr2_spk.patch2) to include them.
> ::> Please aply the new patch to the ori
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxime Henrion writes:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have an idea that I would love to see applied in FreeBSD source code,
> >but as I'm not skilled enough to code it, I post it to see if you think
> >it makes sense, and if someone would b
Here's the kind of thing I have in mind, wrapped around the pthreads
mutexes. This replaces default pthread mutexes (those with no special
attributes) with possibly fast ones. I haven't done any real timing but
I've verified that a program I have works and runs a lot faster with
these wrappers.
Alphred Perlstein wrote:
> Using sysctls is probably the easiest way of doing it.
I am so stupid, Alphred, I did not think sysctl's could be used to
provide access to arrays. I should have looked more.
Chuck Robey wrote:
>Occaisonally, but you'd do better hitting this list in general. I'm on
I've looked at the POSIX spec to find the right way to portably
implement low overhead process synchronization.
I think the right way is to add _POSIX_THREAD_PROCESS_SHARED support
so that mutexes can be shared between processes.
There is something vague about the spec. I don't see that you can
Here is a source file which looks fine to me, but for which I get
unexpected assembler warnings:
#include
__COPYRIGHT("@(#) Copyright (c) 1983, 1988, 1993\n"
"The Regents of the University of California."
" All rights reserved.\n");
Hi !
I have a CVS question, could you please help and answer before I
mangle my CVS archive on www.apsfilter.org ..., that would be very
kind, thanks a lot.
I want to import Cesar Mendozas lists-archive software on a vendor
branch and merge the changes into the HEAD branch ...
Do do I start im
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nicolas Leonard wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to generate a core dump 'explicitly' in
> > > my program. How can that be done ?
> >
> > Call abort(3)
>
> If you want to coredump it "interactively", h
Hello Joseph,
From: Joseph Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:24:04 -0700
::[...]
::> :: Unfortunately this didn't work for mine (Dell Inspiron 7500). How to
::> ::I find out the GPIO values that make windows work? I'm open to trying
::> ::what the Linux driver does. Mind
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:30:25 -0600 (MDT), Ronald G Minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The idea is simple: tset is the fastest, but you only want to spin so
>long. Then you want to drop into the kernel, and wait for someone to wake
>you up.
Agreed.
>Here's a simple test-and-set function for the
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Jeff Rhyason wrote:
> Aah. This isn't quite what I lust for: Is it possible to get a *log* of
> allocation requests rather than aggregate sums or averages? The reason is
> so I can calculate the distribution of the data. For example: the kind of
> information I would like t
> lets say, hypothetically, that i have an ioctl interface to my device
> driver that takes a buffer that looks something like:
>
> struct {
> int length;
> char *buf;
> } mystruct;
>
> and lets say, hypothetically, that i wanted to dma directly
> to/from 'buf'. how would i do that?
>
> i'
29 matches
Mail list logo
