FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
We're doing quite fine in the "max uptime" survey: http://uptime.netcraft.com/today/isp.max.html -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Jonathan Perkin
phk wrote: We're doing quite fine in the "max uptime" survey: http://uptime.netcraft.com/today/isp.max.html Glad you like it - pity we got slashdotted so early :) Although the uptime survey's are new on the site, they have quite a large database to gather from, and will get better as more

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Peter
Have you checked out www.uptime.net ? --- www.nul.cjb.net --- The Power to Crash! --- www.FreeBSD.org --- The Power to Serve! On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: We're doing quite fine in the "max uptime" survey: http://uptime.netcraft.com/today/isp.max.html -- Poul-Henning

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Jamie Heckford
Yes, and is this your idea of spamming / advertising ?!?! Where is any relevant information on this subject? On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, you wrote: Have you checked out www.uptime.net ? --- www.nul.cjb.net --- The Power to Crash! --- www.FreeBSD.org --- The Power to Serve! On Wed, 1 Nov

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Anders Nordby
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Have you checked out www.uptime.net ? Yes, and ? It looks like some random company... I suppose he means www.uptimes.net. Cheers, -- Anders. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anders Nordby writes: On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:09:34PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Have you checked out www.uptime.net ? Yes, and ? It looks like some random company... I suppose he means www.uptimes.net. Ahh, that thing. That is an opt-in scheme, and

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
Yes, and is this your idea of spamming / advertising ?!?! Where is any relevant information on this subject? oh please, if you're going to call that spam, it was the most beniegn spam I've ever seen. It wasn't even worth a reply. Try setting flame_enabled="false" in your rc.conf To

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Peter
Guys, sorry did not mean to spam, but there used to be a site called uptime.net (I'm pretty sure of it) It basically did what netcraft is doing, except it only kept the uptimes. They had some wonderful uptimes of several years. As far as I remember, NETBSD was 1st place and FreeBSD was in

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Eric Melville
No worries, you just forgot the 's' at the end ;) The site is still there, it's just "uptimes.net" not "uptime.net". Guys, sorry did not mean to spam, but there used to be a site called uptime.net (I'm pretty sure of it) It basically did what netcraft is doing, except it only kept the

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Frederik Meerwaldt
Hi all! Guys, sorry did not mean to spam, but there used to be a site called uptime.net (I'm pretty sure of it) It basically did what netcraft is doing, except it only kept the uptimes. They had some wonderful uptimes of several years. As far as I remember, NETBSD was 1st place and FreeBSD

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread David Preece
Possibly off topic, possibly not. Am I the only one who doesn't really care about uptimes? It would be far more productive to get a top 100 (or whatever) of availability... More interesting would be to test availability based on some dynamic content, a given request with an expected outcome a

irq status

2000-11-01 Thread Jamie Heckford
Is their a tool out their or does anyone have a quick bit of code / hack that will "probe" all of the irqs on my box and tell me which ones are used / available?? Thanks, -- Jamie Heckford Chief Network Engineer Psi-Domain - Innovative Linux Solutions. Ask Us How.

Re: irq status

2000-11-01 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jamie Heckford wrote: Is their a tool out their or does anyone have a quick bit of code / hack that will "probe" all of the irqs on my box and tell me which ones are used / available?? dmesg | grep irq Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve [EMAIL

Re: irq status

2000-11-01 Thread Jamie Heckford
ok, is their anyway to probe for base addresses? This is an unusual card, a Dialogic D41/E Computer Telephony card. It *will* work under BSD, just need a base address value now. thanx for help so far btw. On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, you wrote: vmstat -i coupled with dmesg | grep irq should

Re: irq status

2000-11-01 Thread Jamie Heckford
Their is no corresponding device in the kernel !!! These drivers work as a thrid party module, and have seen working before, but need the base address value. On Wed, 01 Nov 2000, you wrote: What device does it correspond to in kernel config file? If the device is in the kernel I would have

Re: irq status

2000-11-01 Thread Mike Smith
Is their a tool out their or does anyone have a quick bit of code / hack that will "probe" all of the irqs on my box and tell me which ones are used / available?? No. You can glean some of this information from various metaconfiguration interface, but the question you're asking suggests

Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey

2000-11-01 Thread Laurence Berland
Just curious, since I can't find the info on the site...what method is being used to determine uptimes on these systems? How can I turn reporting on in FreeBSD? L Jonathan Perkin wrote: phk wrote: We're doing quite fine in the "max uptime" survey:

Kernel calls, are they documented somewhere?

2000-11-01 Thread G. Adam Stanislav
Are the system calls made via interrupt 0x80 documented somewhere? Whatever section 2 of man says does not work when making direct kernel calls. It only describes how the C library calls work. For example, open() returns -1 if the file is not open. But int 80h made in assembly language with EAX

Re: Kernel calls, are they documented somewhere?

2000-11-01 Thread G. Adam Stanislav
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Michael Bacarella wrote: gcc does not generate code that can make FreeBSD system calls directly. Most system calls as we know them by the manual have corresponding wrappers in libc. See /usr/src/lib/libc if you have the source installed. I do have the

US PRESIDENT AND FBI SECRETS =PLEASE VISIT = (http://WWW.2600.COM)=

2000-11-01 Thread Peter Wagner
VERY JOKE..! SEE PRESIDENT AND FBI TOP SECRET PICTURES.. DOMEO.JPG.vbs

US PRESIDENT AND FBI SECRETS =PLEASE VISIT = (http://WWW.2600.COM)=

2000-11-01 Thread Peter Wagner
VERY JOKE..! SEE PRESIDENT AND FBI TOP SECRET PICTURES.. DOMEO.JPG.vbs

VIRUS WARNING

2000-11-01 Thread owner-freebsd-hackers
WARNING! This mail is generated automatically by virus-scanning software. There was virus found in one or more attachment in e-mail sent by: Peter Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] at date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:34:46 - , with subject "US PRESIDENT AND FBI SECRETS =PLEASE VISIT = (http://WWW.2600.CO

Virus Notification: A virus has been detected in a message in which you where a recipient

2000-11-01 Thread Nemx Power Tools for MS Exchange Server_US-EA-GTWY-7_0
From: Peter Wagner [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] To: Date: Thu, Nov 02 2000, 3:34:51 AM Subject:US PRESIDENT AND FBI SECRETS =PLEASE VISIT = (http://WWW.2600.CO M)= The message contained 1 virus(es):

Report to Recipient(s)

2000-11-01 Thread GLADNESS/CrossLogic_Corporation/US
Incident Information:- Originator:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipients:FreeBSD List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: US PRESIDENT AND FBI SECRETS =PLEASE VISIT = (http://WWW.2600.CO M)= WARNING: The file DOMEO.JPG.vbs you received was infected with the VBS/LoveLetter@MM virus. The file attachment