Hi :)
I'm coding an kld for fbsd 4.x for using encrypted file (such sfs/cfs/tcfs)
whis some difference ...
but I've got a problem, when I redir the system call write, I must change
his 2nd argument ( int fd, const void *buf, int nbyte) buf point to
buffer whit data to copy, I cannot change it
I want to get tun0's two ip addresses.
and add ipfw rules to system at my program.
How can I do it?is there a function? or
have document describe it. someone please tell me!
thank you!
oscar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 08:12:50PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to get tun0's two ip addresses.
and add ipfw rules to system at my program.
How can I do it?is there a function? or
have document describe it. someone please tell me!
thank you!
See the tun(4) manpage, it describes
hi, there!
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
nsswitch extends the C library so that arbitrary sources may be
consulted by database routines such as getpwent, gethostbyname, and so
on. This implementation was based on NetBSD's implementation. I have
enhanced it to make the
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is useless for a commercial product for obvious reasons.
I'm looking for something freely available.
Perhaps ftp://athena-dist.mit.edu/pub/ATHENA/ares/ares-1.1.0.tar.gz is
useful? It comes with an MIT-style license.
/assar
To Unsubscribe:
I just upgraded our main server to 4.2
I would like to know why nslookup is complaining about being deprecated and
may be removed from future releases. (why someone would remove it)
Are you guys on crack? nslookup is still tought as part of basic TCP/IP
troubleshooting technique, and I think
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 10:16:29AM -0600, Chuck Rock wrote:
I just upgraded our main server to 4.2
I would like to know why nslookup is complaining about being deprecated and
may be removed from future releases. (why someone would remove it)
On my laptop using RELENG_4 a few days after
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Chuck Rock wrote:
I'm no Guru, but I use nslookup about 2000 times a day, and it pisses me off
to see that it may be missing from future releases.
My 2 cents.
Chuck Rock
Learn to use dig, it's much more useful for debugging purposes.
That being said, I doubt
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:16:29 -0600
"Chuck Rock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
carock I just upgraded our main server to 4.2
carock I would like to know why nslookup is complaining about being deprecated and
carock may be removed from future releases. (why someone would remove it)
I guess you are
Sorry, I found out it's from BIND 9.0.1
Apparently they install their own nslookup command, and it must be first in
my path statement before FreeBSD's
Their command is in /usr/local/bin/nslookup and FreeBSD's is in
/usr/sbin/nslookup
My path statement in the .cshrc file has all my bin path's
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 12:17:36PM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
dillon 2000/12/03 12:17:36 PST
Modified files:
lib/libc/sys mmap.2
Log:
Add warning on file-fragmentation issues related to MAP_NOSYNC
I've got a (hopefully) quick question about this warning. If I'm
I had the same thing until I removed rule 200 in rc.firewall (using open)
#${fwcmd} add 200 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8
Now it works, but I feel a bit less secure, but I don't have anything of
great importance on the box.
One thing I noticed in common, is we're both running Etherlink
hi, there!
Is there anyone using ACE wrappers?
We are using -stable and before 4.2-RELEASE everything was fine
(on systems running 4.2-BETA before libc_r fixes/improvements)
On -stable systems cvsupped yesterday a lot of ACE tests fail
with signal 11 (we are using ACE wrappers 5.1.9). Is there
Are you guys on crack? nslookup is still tought as part of basic TCP/IP
troubleshooting technique, and I think your message about having it removed
I think you're the one on crack - FreeBSD's bundled nslookup doesn't
say anything of the sort.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Max Khon wrote:
hi, there!
Is there anyone using ACE wrappers?
We are using -stable and before 4.2-RELEASE everything was fine
(on systems running 4.2-BETA before libc_r fixes/improvements)
On -stable systems cvsupped yesterday a lot of ACE tests fail
with signal 11
It didn't seem to help for me. I still get lots of permission denied, but
then again, I'm also using a much stricter set of rules.
I seriously hope that the fact we are using 3com etherlink iii cards
doesn't have anything to do with it.
Just to note. As far as I can tell, it's still doing nat
That does not work either. Aren't you the same guy on irc known as billf
and bfumerola that likes to just kline people at random on power trips.
Owww also likes to just ban people on #solaris and #cisco. I think you
are...your that guy who think he knows everything and is better than
everyone
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:18:51PM -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
you gave this guy efnet irc privs!!!
Who's "we"? Why did you post this crap to -hackers? It's totally
off-topic and irrelevant.
--
wca
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
I don;t know if I will be on this list anymore after reporting the abuse
Bill Fumerola has done as he works for freebsd.orgif i am now removed
from this list please cc me any thing he says about me ...thankyou.
--
Dan
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:43:04PM -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
I don;t know if I will be on this list anymore after reporting the abuse
Bill Fumerola has done as he works for freebsd.orgif i am now removed
from this list please cc me any thing he says about me ...thankyou.
What? Where do
I don;t know if I will be on this list anymore after reporting the abuse
Bill Fumerola has done as he works for freebsd.orgif i am now removed
from this list please cc me any thing he says about me ...thankyou.
1. Bill Fumerola does not "work" for FreeBSD.org in the sense that he
Ya, ok let;s stop this childish game already...stupid of me
to stoop to his level.
I appologise formally to anyone that took offence.
Thankyou,
Dan.
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 15:49:40 -0800
From: Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Phoenix
Can someone email me with a brief explaination of this M_ZERO path?
I see it is about something to do with memory (malloc, bcopy, etc.)
Thanks Jessem.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 01:28:12PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone email me with a brief explaination of this M_ZERO path?
I see it is about something to do with memory (malloc, bcopy, etc.)
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/, search the mail archives. phk posted a summary
of the feature
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
:
Can someone email me with a brief explaination of this M_ZERO path?
I see it is about something to do with memory (malloc, bcopy, etc.)
Thanks Jessem.
Since a majority of malloc(9) uses immediately bzero(9)
I've added some pci bios support to doscmd in an effort to initialize a
Maestro-3i via essaudio.com. The new code is derived from the Linux
dosemu, which executes essaudio.com correctly.
It works enough to probe the pci bios, find, and interact with the correct
device. essaudio.com does not
On 4 Dec, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
:
Can someone email me with a brief explaination of this M_ZERO path?
I see it is about something to do with memory (malloc, bcopy, etc.)
Thanks Jessem.
Since a
Hi all,
I spotted this PR in the database today:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11031
I'd like to know: why can't our mount optionally allow configuration of
non-root mounting to a fixed mountpoint? This patch (obviously, it will
need to be updated to sync with the current
hi, there!
On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
I spotted this PR in the database today:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=11031
I'd like to know: why can't our mount optionally allow configuration of
non-root mounting to a fixed mountpoint? This patch (obviously,
Recently there was a message indicating that ISC is deprecating
nslookup. Dan Bernstein who has written a suite of DNS programs
[http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html] had once written to the djbdns list about
problems with nslookup. Enclosed is his message
dig and Dan Bernstein's tools like dnsq are much
[ my one and only post to hackers(bcc:'d) on this thread ]
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 04:07:35PM -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
Ya, ok let;s stop this childish game already...stupid of me
to stoop to his level.
I appologise formally to anyone that took offence.
The administration of
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 21:38:19 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
"Kenneth" == Kenneth D Merry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason why the FWRITE test cannot/should not be
moved down into the 'case PCIOCWRITE' part of the switch? This
would make both PCIOCGETCONF and
On Sunday, 3rd December 2000, "G. Adam Stanislav" wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 10:12:56AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
Yes, you can read from your own pipe, and yes the buffering availabe in
the pipe is limited. IIRC, the pipe size is 8K.
Thank you. In that case I'll be better off using child
ok, since I got about 6 requests in four hours to be Cc'd, I'm
throwing this back onto the list. Sorry for the double-response that
some people are going to get!
Ah, good, since I've been deliberately avoiding reading mail in an
attempt to get something useful done in my last
34 matches
Mail list logo
