The panic is definitely bad. It happens straight after failing the
attach?
If you could recompile the kernel with
options DDB
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
plug the device in again, and after it has panicked (it will drop into
the debugger), type trace. That would give me a
To solve this problem, I invested in one large, fast, fileserver and then
ran the noise-critical machines diskless, with PXE boot. To deal with the
noise of the fileserver, I bought an enclosed rack.
My previous solutions which did an admirable job, were to:
a) purchase the overly expensive,
On 30-Dec-00 Nick Hibma wrote:
For identifying what this is, there's not a lot of info available. It shows
up in Windows as a "Monster Gamepad" with 4 analog axis and 16 buttons, and
just has a single 20 pin DIPP chip inside with these markings (looks like a
PLA to me):
CY7C63000A-PC
[ this message is no personal affront against you, Doug, but an
expression of what feeling this kind of behaviour causes for
those who want to share and find themselves ignored ]
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 18:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
[ ... reminder after two weeks of
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 18:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Speaking only for myself, I don't think your proposed changes
are a good idea, which is why I refrained from offering any
suggestions on how you can test them.
Your refusal(id?) has been the only response so far and it didn't
sound
On Tue 2001-01-02 (12:52), Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 18:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
[ ... reminder after two weeks of silence ... ]
Two weeks of silence is generally enough to let you know that
no one is interested in this modification.
Does anyone know how to reprobe the ATAPI bus, e.g. for a cd rom drive
in a laptop that wasn't present during boot?
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
It seems Josef Karthauser wrote:
Does anyone know how to reprobe the ATAPI bus, e.g. for a cd rom drive
in a laptop that wasn't present during boot?
Yes :)
Most of the code is already in the ATA driver, but the ioctl's and
the atacontrol program is still only here in my lab due to lack
of
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Félix-Antoine Paradis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010101 23:28] wrote:
Hi,
When we do a "dmesg" on a 4.2-STABLE box, we get:
arp: 200.42.126.18 moved from 00:e0:7d:7b:53:f0 to 00:c0:df:f4:ac:05 on ed0
and, in ifconfig, it says:
ed0:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Wes Peters wrote:
You may want to look at http://www.trustedbsd.org/ as well. It is provided
under the Berkeley license, and much of what is developed there will be
folded into FreeBSD as time permits. The primary author of TrustedBSD is
Robert Watson, who is now a
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 03:50:34PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Josef Karthauser wrote:
Does anyone know how to reprobe the ATAPI bus, e.g. for a cd rom drive
in a laptop that wasn't present during boot?
Yes :)
Most of the code is already in the ATA driver, but the ioctl's and
That could look/get ugly.
if
(
retval
==
-1
)
{
// blah
}
hehe ;P
-
Daryl Chance | And which parallel universe did
ValueData, LLC | YOU crawl out of?
Memphis, TN| - http://www.thinkgeek.com
- Original Message -
From: "Josef Karthauser" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 10:22:02AM -0600, Daryl Chance wrote:
That could look/get ugly.
if
(
retval
==
-1
)
{
// blah
}
hehe ;P
He only gets paid if it conforms to style(9) Heh :b.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in
Félix-Antoine Paradis wrote:
Hi,
When we do a "dmesg" on a 4.2-STABLE box, we get:
arp: 200.42.126.18 moved from 00:e0:7d:7b:53:f0 to 00:c0:df:f4:ac:05 on ed0
This means exactly what is says: IP address 200.42.126.18 was originally
associated with ethernet MAC address ...:53:f0, but
It seems Josef Karthauser wrote:
He only gets paid if it conforms to style(9) Heh :b.
Just forget about it then, and be patient :)
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
At 20:29 29/12/00 +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Perfect for your purposes. I, as user (and with some machines
running on FreeBSD), want to be able to rebuild the kernel at any
time, and fix myself when needed. I don't want any binary packages
that can cause trouble and delay days.
before
Hi,
I installed FreeBSD 4.2 on my home PC last week and
everything installed fine except for the desktop managers.
When I tried to install KDE, I got the following errors:
Add of package xpm-3.4k aborted, error code 1-
Please check the debug screen for more info
acd0: READ_BIG_MEDIUM ERROR
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 05:54:34PM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Josef Karthauser wrote:
He only gets paid if it conforms to style(9) Heh :b.
Just forget about it then, and be patient :)
Oh go on then :) I'll pay you anyway :).
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
At 09:47 01-01-02 -0700, you wrote:
Félix-Antoine Paradis wrote:
Hi,
When we do a "dmesg" on a 4.2-STABLE box, we get:
arp: 200.42.126.18 moved from 00:e0:7d:7b:53:f0 to 00:c0:df:f4:ac:05 on ed0
This means exactly what is says: IP address 200.42.126.18 was originally
associated
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is executing
(with remote debugging or ddb)?
Thanks for your help.
-Zhihui
To
I administer a box running v4.2-stable with a pair of the Adaptec ANA-62044
64-bit PCI, Quad port ethernet adapters. Six of the eight ethernet ports
are in use. The box routes traffic between five private networks and
provides NAT services out the public world on the sixth interface.
I
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010102 10:17] wrote:
I administer a box running v4.2-stable with a pair of the Adaptec ANA-62044
64-bit PCI, Quad port ethernet adapters. Six of the eight ethernet ports
are in use. The box routes traffic between five private networks and
provides NAT
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Nick Hibma wrote:
The panic is definitely bad. It happens straight after failing the
attach?
Yep, but only during the kernel boot. Hot plugging the device after the system
is booted spews the same errors to the console but does not cause a panic:
uhid0: no report
On 02-Jan-01 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 18:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Speaking only for myself, I don't think your proposed changes
are a good idea, which is why I refrained from offering any
suggestions on how you can test them.
Your refusal(id?) has been the only
In this message I use the pronoun "you" quite a lot. It does not refer to
anyone specifically. It's generic.
On 2 Jan 2001, at 12:52, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
Silence as I see it is just
a sign for "nobody answered", without a reason to see why.
You are not alone in this regard. Silence
This machine is an Intel Pentium Pro based system, (not a DEC Alpha), it
currently has one 200mhz 512K CPU, 196megs RAM, (4 x 32edo simms, 4 x
16edo simms), and two 4.5Gig SCSI disks in hot-swappable drive carriages
configured using RAID 1 (mirrored), attached to a Mylex DAC960P/PD
dual-channel
Some more fuel...
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, [iso-8859-1] Félix-Antoine Paradis wrote:
Hi,
When we do a "dmesg" on a 4.2-STABLE box, we get:
arp: 200.42.126.18 moved from 00:e0:7d:7b:53:f0 to 00:c0:df:f4:ac:05 on ed0
From personal experience, Linux has this nasty bad habit of broadcasting
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is executing
(with remote debugging or ddb)?
[Sorry for lack of message in this reply but I accidently rm'd the
original emails to reply to :-) ]
One thing I've done in the past is if it's convenient in a section of code
to hijack a function pointer in the kernel, then hijack it so that it will
call your code...
Silly, and not always
Hi all,
Two questions:
0) Are native binaries for OpenBSD different from FreeBSD?
1) Can a native binary dlopen a Linux ELF GL, yes or no?
Rafael Barrero
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"You know ... you take the killing for granted. And then it's gone, and you're like,
'I wish I'd appreciated it more.'
On Tuesday, 2 January 2001 at 14:03:16 -0800, Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
to attach to the process and somehow find
Rafael Barrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0) Are native binaries for OpenBSD different from FreeBSD?
Yes.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi. I have a netgear Ethernet card installed in my
computer. In order to reconnect my computer to the internet, I have to reinstall
the drivers and they're missing. So, I opened up my computer to look at the
Ethernet card and I copied down the necessary numbers. However, I do not know
how
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it
On Tuesday, 2 January 2001 at 23:22:49 -0500, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Zhiui Zhang wrote:
I have written a KLD and am debugging it. The program often hangs after
runs for a while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
Is there anyone out there who feels like rejecting the proposal
for a *reason*? Or to accept the idea, but to redirect the
effort to a "real solution"? I somehow doubt you'd rather
explain again and again that cron(8) isn't broken but that users
should shuffle around
- Original Message -
From: "James Halstead" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Boot process robustness
- Original Message -
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Walter W. Hop" [EMAIL
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:02:03PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
arp: 200.42.126.18 moved from 00:e0:7d:7b:53:f0 to 00:c0:df:f4:ac:05 on ed0
From personal experience, Linux has this nasty bad habit of broadcasting
ARPs on all interfaces. For this reason multihomed Linux boxes should be
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:38:30PM +1000, Greg Black scribbled:
| Gerhard Sittig wrote:
| Is there anyone out there who feels like rejecting the proposal
| for a *reason*? Or to accept the idea, but to redirect the
| effort to a "real solution"? I somehow doubt you'd rather
| explain again
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:36 -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
[ manpage diff for cron.c change reasoning ]
I must've missed this the first time through.
I hoped that silence is not always meant in a negativ way. :
See my first message to freebsd-hackers as of December 5th at
[If need be, please add Cc: to -net]
While doing my own research project, I came across this piece
of information. It seems like a "nobody-has-it-but-it-is-fast" thing.
http://www.psc.edu/networking/ftp/papers/draft-ratehalving.txt
It seeks to improve the Reno TCP implementation by the most
Is this specified in the IPv6 specs? Does KAME do this?
I don't think so. TCP on IPv6 is exactly the same as TCP on IPv4.
only differences I know of are in the following portion:
(1) pseudo-header checksum documented in in RFC2460 section 8.1
(2) jumbogram
42 matches
Mail list logo
