GCC Upgrade?

2001-03-16 Thread Farooq Mela
Howdy, GCC 2.95.3 was just released. I did notice that there are some bug fixes in the optimizer, and some various other fixes etc. Considering the recent discussion about incorrect code generation due to -O2 and above, are there any plans to import this new release into the FreeBSD source tree?

sysctl_kern_proc doesn't handle the case when no procs match given criteria

2001-03-16 Thread Dima Dorfman
Hello -hackers The sysctl_kern_proc routine in kern_proc.c doesn't handle the case when no processes match the given criteria. I.e., if no processes match, it will return 0 even though it never called SYSCTL_OUT; thus, the output data is junk. This can be demonstrated by giving ps(1) arguments

Re: device driver dev. book

2001-03-16 Thread Leif Neland
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Bill Paul wrote: > > Some body just told me that williams Paul from Columbia University (Bill > > Paul @ Freebsd.org) has written that > > kind of book. But I can't get his exact email address at FreeBSD.org to > > ask him the reference. > > GR. > > Look, I have n

Re: Remote boot, but not diskless operation

2001-03-16 Thread Paul Saab
Thierry Herbelot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Paul Saab wrote: > > > > Hi, > > My problem is that the NIC I'm trying to boot from is an on-board fxp on > a Motorola p-III M/B (I assume there is no specific "PXE rom", as PXE > may be included in the BIOS) > > will your "intel board" upgrade .ex

Re: Remote boot, but not diskless operation

2001-03-16 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Paul Saab wrote: > Hi, My problem is that the NIC I'm trying to boot from is an on-board fxp on a Motorola p-III M/B (I assume there is no specific "PXE rom", as PXE may be included in the BIOS) will your "intel board" upgrade .exe work in this setup ? TfH > Upgrade the PXE rom > htt

Re: Remote boot, but not diskless operation

2001-03-16 Thread Paul Saab
Thierry Herbelot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > One way to boot the kernel over the network is to use PXE (if your > machine is recent enough to support it *well* : that is with a recent > version of the PXE firmware) > > there is no real document on PXE booting > you can read a note by Al

Re: device driver dev. book

2001-03-16 Thread Bill Paul
> Some body just told me that williams Paul from Columbia University (Bill > Paul @ Freebsd.org) has written that > kind of book. But I can't get his exact email address at FreeBSD.org to > ask him the reference. GR. Look, I have not now nor have I *ever* written a book of any kind. Whoe

Re: /bin/ps thing

2001-03-16 Thread Jordan DeLong
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:35:29AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:04:43AM +, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > It seemed that send-pr was just for reporting issues, not for fixing > > them also > > Nope. At the bottom of the send-pr form, is a "How to fix" section. > > --

Re: /bin/ps thing

2001-03-16 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:04:43AM +, Jordan DeLong wrote: > It seemed that send-pr was just for reporting issues, not for fixing > them also Nope. At the bottom of the send-pr form, is a "How to fix" section. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX

Re: Remote boot, but not diskless operation

2001-03-16 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Hi, One way to boot the kernel over the network is to use PXE (if your machine is recent enough to support it *well* : that is with a recent version of the PXE firmware) there is no real document on PXE booting you can read a note by Alfred Perlstein on

Re: Machines are getting too damn fast

2001-03-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 16), Joachim Strmbergson said: > In an earlier mail to the thread I pointed to the STREAM benchmark > for memory sub systems. Additionally, I wrote that I knew there were > another benchmark that tries to analyze word sizes, access latencies > for the different memories in

/bin/ps thing

2001-03-16 Thread Jordan DeLong
First let me state that I really don't know the proper place to be putting this. If this is the wrong list, I appologize, please let me know the prefered method for submitting minor patches. It seemed that send-pr was just for reporting issues, not for fixing them also, if this should've gone th

Re: status of KSE?

2001-03-16 Thread Julian Elischer
Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:59:24PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > Hello Julian, > > > > Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote: > > > > JE> David Xu wrote: > > >> > > >>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application > > >> server using kqueue+pthre

Re: status of KSE?

2001-03-16 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:59:24PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > Hello Julian, > > Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote: > > JE> David Xu wrote: > >> > >>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application > >> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread

Re: Machines are getting too damn fast

2001-03-16 Thread Joachim Strömbergson
Aloha! In an earlier mail to the thread I pointed to the STREAM benchmark for memory sub systems. Additionally, I wrote that I knew there were another benchmark that tries to analyze word sizes, access latencies for the different memories in the mem sub system. I know can name that benchmark (or

Re: natd divert injecting clarifications

2001-03-16 Thread Julian Elischer
Nick Rogness wrote: > > Just to be sure I have it right. When the kernel diverts the packet to > natd, via ipfw: > > 1) kernel sends packet to natd > 2) natd read() the packet > 3) natd screws with it (changes dest addr,etc) > 4) natd write() the packet > 5) kernel reinjects the packet back int

Remote boot, but not diskless operation

2001-03-16 Thread Rohit Rakshe
Hello, I am running FreeBSD 4.1 on an Intel-III box. It is not a diskless machine, so root fs is still local, but I need to boot kernel over ethernet. Reason for such a requirement: I am doing some kernel debugging and it is relatively quicker (after a panic) to recompile kernel on a server and

Re: httpfs

2001-03-16 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:46:49AM +, Tony Finch wrote: > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >What I did was implement an 'exec' portal method, which executes a program > >with given arguments, obtained from the path components and portal.conf > >rules, and returns a - basically r

Re: httpfs

2001-03-16 Thread Tony Finch
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >What I did was implement an 'exec' portal method, which executes a program >with given arguments, obtained from the path components and portal.conf >rules, and returns a - basically read-only - descriptor connected to its >stdout and stderr. Kind of si