[This question is more appropriate for -net IMHO]
-On [20010322 03:00], David E. Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I recently tried (for the first time) to get gif running under FreeBSD
4.3-BETA (cvsup-ed yesterday). I noticed the following:
gifconfig gif0 inet 10.1.1.1 10.1.2.1
ifconfig gif0
On Monday 19 March 2001 4:36, Will Andrews wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 07:46:53PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
I never got an answer (as usual) from bill paul when I made the
suggestions, and noone seemed interested in getting it fixed. He seems to
get insulted when I infer that he did
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:14:32PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
The (maybe too lightweight) structure I have in my patch
looks like this:
struct pte_chain {
struct pte_chain * next;
pte_t * ptep;
};
Each pte_chain hangs off a page of physical memory and the
ptep is a pointer
I have server under FreeBSD 4.2 with apache fired simple C++ CGI for
each connection.
Aproximately every 12H uptime server stop responding.
Kernel answers to ping, establish TCP connection but unable to fork
process.
(no messages in /var/log/messages)
This is statisitics (netstat -nm top )
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:33:14PM +0300, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Any ideas?
With hangs like this using the debugger to find out what the kernel
is doing is often the best bet. You'll need to compile the debugger
into the kernel and then leave the server on a vty that doesn't
have X running.
root@ds101:DS101#make
linking kernel.debug
vm_zone.o: In function `zalloci':
/sys/compile/DS101/../../vm/vm_zone.h:81: undefined reference to
`zerror'
/sys/compile/DS101/../../vm/vm_zone.h:91: undefined reference to
`zerror'
vm_zone.o: In function `zfreei':
they've done this, but their newest BIOS (8 days old) still has a 0.78
PXE revision (I've seen more recent DELL machines with a 0.99 - I assume
this is better)
I have many intel MBs with built-in fxp nics that have 0.78 that work with
4.2's pxeboot just fine - I'm not trying to boot kernel
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, thinker wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:14:32PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
The (maybe too lightweight) structure I have in my patch
looks like this:
struct pte_chain {
struct pte_chain * next;
pte_t * ptep;
};
Each pte_chain hangs off a page of
Hi
I read bpf(4) man page and have one question about BPF.
Suppose I open one of free BPF devices /dev/bpf??. I can dup(2)
descriptor of opened BPF device and get so called shared interface.
Can I setup different filters on each descriptor for opened BPF device?
If I can do it, how can I do the
I just got off the phone with Linda Sanchez at our favorite company
Intel. She is a Sr. "Marketing Engineer" (What is a marketing
engineer?) for their LAN products. She is itnerested in helping us get the
information we need to write drivers for their cards. But she also knows
NDA's are
Random idea from the peanut gallery...
Find someone who is NDA'd and knows both the programming manual and the
needs of the device driver. Have that person compose a list of those bits
of the manual most necessary for getting a working driver. This would
be an explicit list of figures,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
She need's specific information that we need that we cant get
unless we sign NDA's for the doc's so she can try and get them merged into
a reference product somewhere between the datasheet (worthless) and the
programming manual (NDA). I know this is not
In article
local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
She need's specific information that we need that we cant get
unless we sign NDA's for the doc's so she can try and get them merged into
a reference product somewhere between the datasheet (worthless) and the
programming
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Let me just pipe in a bit. Compromise seems just like the kind of thing
marketing or legal would want to do. The problem is that _we_ cannot
compromise because one cannot write a "half-way there" driver. It's a
technical impossibility.
I agree
Dmitry Samersoff writes:
I have server under FreeBSD 4.2 with apache fired simple C++ CGI for
each connection.
Aproximately every 12H uptime server stop responding.
Kernel answers to ping, establish TCP connection but unable to fork
process.
(no messages in /var/log/messages)
Looks
-- Forwarded message --
Hello Mr. Chris Watson
Thanks for taking the time to discuss with me your concerns.
Could you take the the time to forward me some sort of representative list
of the types of information that FreeBSD developers require to do driver
development?
Would
For what it's worth, I believe I'm still committed to work on the GigE driver.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
btw- *I* have no problem with an NDA as long as it includes a rider that says
what we could release as open source.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In article
local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
btw- *I* have no problem with an NDA as long as it includes a rider that says
what we could release as open source.
Hah, me neither. In fact, if you want to try out a binary of my
Intel GigE driver, it is at
I hate to say it, but anything that gets axed out of the manual basically
means that those features of the chip will not be used. I honestly don't
think that the marketer you talked to really understands this; I can't
for the life of me see how anything less than the programming manual
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 10:39:58AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I hate to say it, but anything that gets axed out of the manual basically
means that those features of the chip will not be used. I honestly don't
think that the marketer you talked to really understands this; I can't
for
-Original Message-
From: David O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:41 PM
To: Matt Simerson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 4.3-BETA world crashing 4.2-RELEASE kernel ?
First let me say to anyone reading the email I am replying to:
don't
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010322 11:47] wrote:
I know that this is going to look like I should have posted it
on the "-arch-questions" list, but there isn't one, and it
involves future work (I think), so here goes...
Has anyone tried playing with 4MB pages for doing other things?
On 22-Mar-01 Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
root@ds101:DS101#make
linking kernel.debug
vm_zone.o: In function `zalloci':
/sys/compile/DS101/../../vm/vm_zone.h:81: undefined reference to
`zerror'
/sys/compile/DS101/../../vm/vm_zone.h:91: undefined reference to
`zerror'
vm_zone.o: In function
Just an update on the lovely loaded BBS server.
We made our record-breaking number of users last night.
After implementing the changes suggested, and kqueue'ifying
the BBS daemon. We saw a dramatic increase in server power.
Top number of users was 4704 users. Serving SSH, HTTP, SMTP, innd,
* Michael C . Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010322 12:29] wrote:
Just an update on the lovely loaded BBS server.
We made our record-breaking number of users last night.
After implementing the changes suggested, and kqueue'ifying
the BBS daemon. We saw a dramatic increase in server power.
Top
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Let me just pipe in a bit. Compromise seems just like the kind of thing
marketing or legal would want to do. The problem is that _we_ cannot
compromise because one cannot write a "half-way there" driver. It's a
technical impossibility.
I
On 22-Mar-01 Matt Simerson wrote:
Lets explain why: There are times when the kernel source is changed to
use constructs of newer compiler/assembler/linker tools. Thus the kernel
will not build with an older set of tools. The what "make buildkernel"
does is use the tools (ie, those built
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 12:51:00PM -0700, Matt Simerson wrote:
Actually, they aren't backwards. You've gone and snipped the parts of my
original message that show that the commands are being executed at the same
time.
I read you message twice and came away with the same idea. You should
hello there!
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
(Why is vfs.vmiodirenable=1 not enabled by default?)
By the way, is there any all-in-one-place description of sysctl tuneables?
Looking all the man pages and collecting notices about MIB variables seems
rather tiresome and, I think,
:(Why is vfs.vmiodirenable=1 not enabled by default?)
:
The only reason it isn't enabled by default is some unresolved
filesystem corruption that occurs very rarely (with or without
it) that Kirk and I are still trying to nail down. I want to get
that figured out first.
It
OK, let's approach this from a little different angle:
Below is the appropriate entries from /usr/src/UPDATING on a FreeBSD
4-stable machine. As of 2/2/2001, the most correct and safest method for
updating your FreeBSD machine is as follows:
cd /usr/src
make buildworld
make kernel
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
In article
local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you write:
She need's specific information that we need that we cant get
unless we sign NDA's for the doc's so she can try and get them merged into
a reference product somewhere between the datasheet
On 23-Mar-01 Matt Simerson wrote:
OK, let's approach this from a little different angle:
Below is the appropriate entries from /usr/src/UPDATING on a FreeBSD
4-stable machine. As of 2/2/2001, the most correct and safest method for
updating your FreeBSD machine is as follows:
cd
In article Pine.BSF.4.21.0103211840550.79471-10@localhost,
Max Khon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, there!
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
Has anyone implemented/thought of implementing:
- a CAM transport for ATAPI devices;
Yes. It's not a lot of work.
that would
35 matches
Mail list logo
