Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:24:54, gzjyliu (Jiangyi Liu) wrote about "How to recompile
kernel after minor changes?":
> After just changing a little in sys/kern/kern_sig.c, how can I rebuild
> the kernel fast? I think it should not take such a long time as 'make
> buildkernel' does. Anyway, just ke
I'll probably commit something similar to this to -current on sunday,
and -stable next weekend. This patch should fix the process killing
part of the VM system. It fixes two things:
(1) It starts killing processes a little earlier, before the machine
truely hoses itself.
I am coding a simple debugger, and I need to know the proper way to
save and restore the state of the debugger's terminal when the child
process is not executing. For example, if the debugger ptraces a process
which gets a signal and returns control to the debugger, the debugger
needs to restore
Oh yah, one more thing. At risk of making the second level block
more complex you might want to make a real structure out of it rather
then a simple array. Something like this:
struct whateverYouNameTheSecondLevelBLock {
short use;
charfiller[sizeof(void *)
:
:Thanks for the comments :-) Yes, malloc pool fragmentation is a
:problem. I think that it can be addressed to some extent by using
:a 2-level system (an array of pointers to fixed-size arrays) instead
:of a single large array, but I'm open to any better suggestions.
I do precisely this fo
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach)
> Date: Sat 2 Jun, 2001
> Subject: Re: Fixing documented bug in env(1)
> people use --
> to end subsequences of arguments all the time.
No, they use ``--'' to indicate to getopt(3) the end of the _options_ and
the _start_ of the arguments.
Since env(1)
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:34:31PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Brian Reichert wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:59:34PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > > I have just upgraded my debug/test systems here to 4.3-stable and I'm
> > > now getting all of my device driver p
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:35:32PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:31:45AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:07:28PM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > > * Jiangyi Liu <[EMAIL
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:31:45AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:07:28PM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > * Jiangyi Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010601 20:25] wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Afte
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:07:28PM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Jiangyi Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010601 20:25] wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After just changing a little in sys/kern/kern_sig.c, how can I rebuild
> > > th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Dillon writes:
>What are your commit plans? It looks extremely well contained,
>it could be committed to -current and then -stable a few days later
>without any destabilizing impact at all for when the option isn't
>specified.
...
>The on
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Brian Reichert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:59:34PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote:
> > I have just upgraded my debug/test systems here to 4.3-stable and I'm
> > now getting all of my device driver printf's spewed to my root rlogin
> > windows. When these two systems were 4.0
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> FWIW, I, too, think that '--' would be a POLA-friendly choice.
> However, if '==' were chosen, the patch to env.c would have to be
> slightly modified, as attached.
Yes, using '--' seems like a reasonable thing to do.
Consistency with other uses of an
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:46:28AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Spike Gronim writes:
>
> > I understand the literal meaning of /usr/src/lib/libcrypt/crypt-md5.c,
> >and the algorithm it uses to create it's output. However, I do not understand
> >the design
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:07:28PM -0400, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jiangyi Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010601 20:25] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After just changing a little in sys/kern/kern_sig.c, how can I rebuild
> > the kernel fast? I think it should not take such a long time as 'make
> > buil
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:03:38AM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 9:12 PM -0700 6/1/01, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> >Honestly, I don't care about this all that much. I'll
> >let you and David debate this to your liking. If no
> >consensus develops in the next few days, I'll just
> >commit what I
16 matches
Mail list logo
