Dear Jordan,
Bill Gates has jumped in to clarify "OS vs. GPL" surprisingly quickly after
the publication in WSJ. Lee is my hero.
>
> Sort of the other way around. We were the "several FreeBSD
> volunteers" referenced in the article. Lee's my press contact at the
> WSJ and he's done a number o
Koster, K.J. said on Jun 21, 2001 at 10:24:24:
> Perhaps Lee can consider tracking down how much GLP lisenced software is
> used in companies in close proximity to Microsoft. While Microsoft is not
> going to be caught dead using it,
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/interixinc.asp
Pl
OOPs ;)
check
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-20-018-20-NW-MS-SW
Ak
> Koster, K.J. said on Jun 21, 2001 at 10:24:24:
> > Perhaps Lee can consider tracking down how much GLP lisenced software is
> > used in companies in close proximity to Microsoft. While
> Microsoft is not
>
"Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-20-018-20-NW-MS-SW
Doesn't this mean software developed with Microsoft's SDK is viral?
And doesn't *that* mean you're not allowed to develop it with
Microsoft's SDK? And doesn't this sound a bit circular?
DE
David Preece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone close enough to drive round and have a quiet word?
> "Netiquette" for instance. Or "asking for trouble".
Or "lookity shiny new baseball bat"?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Back to swapping socket structures...
>
> You could swap them if you wanted to give up some KVA
> space to be able to do it.
Which is a problem, especially for Linux. The problem
here is that there are x86 machines around with 64GB of
RAM. Linux has j
On 21 Jun 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-20-018-20-NW-MS-SW
>
> Doesn't this mean software developed with Microsoft's SDK is viral?
> And doesn't *that* mean you're not allowed to develop it with
> Micros
hi,
I have made few modifications to whois(1) to shut up BDECFLAGS
warnings, cleanup code, and add new features.
Main aim of this patch is to add flexibility to people
who want to point whois(1) to non-deault whois server,
i.e. have to type "-h server name" many times.
It adds new command line
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> James Housley wrote:
> >
> > Wes Peters wrote:
> > >
> > > Charles:
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > Joao Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
> > > > >
> > > > > Does FreeBSD has any related work about it as an real time operating
> > > > > system?
>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:08:21PM +0300, Alexey Zelkin wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have made few modifications to whois(1) to shut up BDECFLAGS
> warnings, cleanup code, and add new features.
[snip]
>
> Resume: with this patch included to add new country's whois server
> we'll need to add only one strin
hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:25:46PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > I have made few modifications to whois(1) to shut up BDECFLAGS
> > warnings, cleanup code, and add new features.
> [snip]
> >
> > Resume: with this patch included to add new country's whois server
> > we'll need to add only
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:08:21PM +0300, Alexey Zelkin wrote:
> It adds new command line modifier "-c" to declare server code.
> Originally it was supposed to point to country's whois
> server, but with no modifications can be used for other areas.
>
> For example you can have following string i
Rahul Siddharthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/interix/interixinc.asp
> Plenty of GNU stuff there, though it doesn't say so explicitly.
> Of course, they say it's all meant only for "legacy Unix" stuff.
"Legacy" being industry jargon for "working".
the device to which i am writing a driver doesn't have a pre-assigned MAC
address. only after the system boots up, a user level program will assign
it a MAC address.
I want to know if it is correct to attach a network interface without MAC
address.
And if it is o.k., when i get the MAC address
No reactions the first time, let's try again.
I've encountered a problem in the interaction betwen signals, longjmp and
pthreads; I'm hoping someone can help me make sense of it.
I've been trying to implement a IsBadReadPtr-style function in FreeBSD by
using signal handlers and longjmp/setjmp. I
cross posting this to -smp and -hackers as it
seems to be a problem there.
for those who are new to the problem, in -stable
we have reports of "shutdown now" hanging rather
than dropping to single user mode.
I have a dual PIII machine. At 4.2-RELEASE I had
no problems at all. However, two/
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:40:44PM +1200, David Preece wrote:
> >1-877-230-7268
>
> Is anyone close enough to drive round and have a quiet word? "Netiquette"
> for instance. Or "asking for trouble".
Well if you're in the US, why not call him? The further away the better. :^)
- alex
To Unsub
Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RTEMS is not pure-GPL -- it does allow binary redistribution.
So does "pure GPL", as long as you make the sources available. If you
mean that you can redistribute (potentially modified) RTEMS binaries
without providing the source code, then you've effe
I have two pc card NICs in my system - ep0 and wi0. All of the normal
problems (irq, etc.) have been solved, and I am using them beautifully.
The problem is, I would like to use the pccard_ifconfig directive to
configure BOTH of these cards from /etc/rc.conf.
Currently, I have _one_ pccard_i
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 04:13:29PM -, list tracker scribbled:
|
| I have two pc card NICs in my system - ep0 and wi0. All of the normal
| problems (irq, etc.) have been solved, and I am using them beautifully.
|
| The problem is, I would like to use the pccard_ifconfig directive to
| conf
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > RTEMS is not pure-GPL -- it does allow binary redistribution.
>
> So does "pure GPL", as long as you make the sources available. If you
> mean that you can redistribute (potentially modified) RTEMS binaries
> without
* Louis-Philippe Gagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010621 09:56] wrote:
> No reactions the first time, let's try again.
>
> I've encountered a problem in the interaction betwen signals, longjmp and
> pthreads; I'm hoping someone can help me make sense of it.
>
> I've been trying to implement a IsBadRe
[snip]
>
> ERRORS
> If the contents of the env are corrupted, or correspond to an
environment
> that has already returned, the longjmp() routine calls the routine
I interpreted that as referring to the case when we longjmp after the
_function_ that called setjmp has returned, but yes, "
Hello all,
I've been trying to resolve this for a few weeks now. Previous posts to
-questions have produced no useful info, and I haven't found anything in
the list archives that has helped.
This machine is running 4.3-STABLE cvsupped from May 21. I have
experienced the exact same problem with v
So what you are saying is that there _is not_ any way to perform multiple
pccard_ifconfig statements solely in /etc/rc.conf ?
I feel that defining it in /etc/rc.conf is more elegant, and am surprised
that it was built to work with one card but will not work with another one.
btw, as I succes
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:24:29PM -, list tracker scribbled:
| So what you are saying is that there _is not_ any way to perform multiple
| pccard_ifconfig statements solely in /etc/rc.conf ?
|
| I feel that defining it in /etc/rc.conf is more elegant, and am surprised
| that it was built t
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:24:29PM -, list tracker wrote:
> So what you are saying is that there _is not_ any way to perform multiple
> pccard_ifconfig statements solely in /etc/rc.conf ?
There's a method in -current, I'm not sure why it hasn't been MFC'd.
I'll put it on my todo list of no o
There is following comment inside ufs_mknod() which says
/*
* Remove inode, then reload it through VFS_VGET so it is
* checked to see if it is an alias of an existing entry in
* the inode cache.
*/
I really can not understand it. For each new disk inode, we call
u
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:46:39 -0700
> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
brooks> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:24:29PM -, list tracker wrote:
> So what you are saying is that there _is not_ any way to perform multiple
> pccard_ifconfig statements solely in /etc/rc.conf ?
brooks> T
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:23:43PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 10:39:05 -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> > >
> > > whois -c ru freebsd.org.ru (use -- whois.ripn.net)
> >
> > whois -Q freebsd.org.ru
> >
> > > whois -c ua freebsd.org.ua (use -- whois.net.ua)
> >
> > whois
Thus spake Bill Moran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> http://www.prioritydesigns.com/crashdata/ contains the files. I've put a
> dmesg.out (obvious) as well as the kernel.0, vmcore.0 and kernel.debug
> there, if anyone would like to run it through gdb themselves
> (***WARNING*** vmcore.0 is 128M) (NOTE, t
>From: Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: multiple pccard_ifconfig statements in one rc.conf ? Problems.
>Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:31:54 -0700
>
>On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:18:3
ok, the removable_interfaces method worked wonderfully - just like I
wanted. Thank you.
I am using a Dell OEM'd Lucent wavelan card, so I had to add this to my
/etc/defaults/pccard.conf - perhaps you would like to add this to future
releases of said file:
# Dell TrueMobile (OEMed Lucent W
Alexander Langer wrote:
>
> Thus spake Bill Moran ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > So ... I'm looking for any possible help in straightening this out.
> > Advice on how to run gdb more effectively is welcome, as well as anyone
>
> Hi!
>
> In the handbook there is a chapter about how to debug kernels.
>
> I did not follow things going on carefully for almost two months while
> I'd a deal with graduate project, but now since it's finished (Yay!!!)
> and I got some time I started to dig to old patches (made during last
> three months) and it's one of them. :) I'd incorporated few missing
> points
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> assistance (John Dyson's work on the unified VM and
> buffer cache predated all such non-academic work in
> all commercial UNIX implementations by almost two years,
> and included cache coloring, which was a brand new
> concept, at the time). FreeBSD
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Your MUA is a known text mutilator. You'd be better off getting a
UNIX-based MUA:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
On Wednesday, 20 June 2001 at 11:16:18 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROT
Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arg.. I wish you had contacted me before doing this work. From looking at
> your patch, your using an old copy of my work. The newest one is available
> at: http://testbed.q9media.net/freebsd/whois.patch and will be committed
> very-shortly-now(tm).
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Hmm, let's see:
>
> Assignee: Digital Equipment Corporation (Maynard, MA)
> Appl. No.: 646734
> Filed: May 3, 1996
>
> Versus:
>
> * Derived from hp300 version by Mike Hibler, this version by William
>
I would appreciate comments on the following patch:
http://testbed.q9media.net/freebsd/whois.20010622.patch
It does the following:
o Implement recursive IP Address searches based on the results of
a query to ARIN. This allows a user to type 'whois 210.139.255.223'
and get the expected resul
Install:
4.2-RELEASE from CDRom, GENERIC kernel
"shutdown now" works fine.
4.3-RELEASE from CDRom, GENERIC kernel
"shutdown now" fails, hangs machine.
It seems I was outa touch with the SMP
idea. The 4.3-RELEASE generic kernel
(without smp) causes the problem so I
won't cross post this to -sm
41 matches
Mail list logo
