Hi all,
In -current and -stable, mountmsdosfs() doesn't not check if
pm_nxtfree exceeds the max cluster in the file system. So if a corrupted
msdos filesystem(which is not uncommon) is written, the following code
in updatefats()@msdosfs_fat.c will generate an unpleasure panic. :)
u_long
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 12:14:51AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when I load up the installed kernel in / with 'gdb -k kernel' .. it says debugging
symbols not found
The kernel which is installed is stripped of debugging symbols -
you sound find a kernel.debug with symbols in teh compile
No real knowledge of the ipfw code or the motives behind it here,
but just a comment..
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:51:33PM +0800, Igor Podlesny wrote:
[snip]
// so here we start looking through the queue
ia != NULL
// sanity (I'd have written just (ia))
Yep, just (ia) would
// so here we start looking through the queue
ia != NULL
// sanity (I'd have written just (ia))
Yep, just (ia) would have worked, but style(9) mandates (ia != NULL),
which is much easier to understand
:)
Don't want to dispute about the 'right' style :), but :))
I prefer
Hi,
While reading the perlrun(1) manpage today, I stumbled upon a reference
to an undump utility that could convert a core file into an executable
image (arguably much larger than the actual executable text, because it
would have to include the data portions, too). Is there anyhing similar
Igor Podlesny wrote:
/*
* Macro for finding the interface (ifnet structure) corresponding to one
* of our IP addresses.
*/
#define INADDR_TO_IFP(addr, ifp) \
/* struct in_addr addr; */ \
/* struct ifnet *ifp; */ \
{ \
register struct in_ifaddr *ia; \
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:47:49AM +, E.B. Dreger scribbled:
| 1. Is AIO SMP-safe?
AIO is not safe, SMP or not.
That is a pretty strong statement. Could you add some more information
on this? I have had problems with AIO last year, but I
In a message dated 06/29/2001 11:01:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Really? Have you even looked at the net4501 board which was mentioned?
It's
a single-board computer constructed for some specific communication
applications, with no VGA or keyboard
I need about 1000 processes for a high-volume mail gateway. I´m already
getting errors in peak periods with the default maxproc of 530.
It seems I can´t set this in loader.conf, as I can other read-only params.
Do I have to install the source and recompile?
Len
I am trying to run two 3com 3c589 pc-cards in one system. Technically one
is a straight 3c589 and one is 3c589c.
irqs are good, since I can put any one of the two 3c589's into the laptop
along with a wavelan (wi) and both cards show up fine and work.
But when I put two 3c589's in, the first
Please scroll down
Please scroll down
It's not clear what you mean by "interrupt the Kernel for
resources"... the only resources you can grab at interrupt
are things that you pre-allocated, things you get from a
zalloci() from a
Really? Have you even looked at the net4501 board which was mentioned?
It's
a single-board computer constructed for some specific communication
applications, with no VGA or keyboard support, or spinning fans, and
is
pretty inexpensive and in a very small form
FreeBSD's xinstall [install(1)] lacks a way to pass arguments to strip.
In non-ELF systems this can be important. Below is a patch to FreeBSD's
xinstall TOT that adds a -Z flag that takes an argument that can be
passed to strip(1) when it is exec'd. It also lets the user specify an
Igor Podlesny [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
// so here we start looking through the queue
ia != NULL
// sanity (I'd have written just (ia))
Yep, just (ia) would have worked, but style(9) mandates (ia != NULL),
which is much easier to understand
:)
Don't want to
In a message dated 06/30/2001 3:44:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your premise that embedded appliances are somehow doomed to use
pitifully
outdated processors is simply wrong.
Who said anything about pitifully outdated processors. I can buy a heck
of
Hi,
Please look over the following patch to ddb. This patch adds the
'hwatch' and 'dhwatch' commands to set and delete hardware
watchpoints. These commands allow one to utilize hardware watchpoints
without having to modify the debug registers directly (which can be
tricky).
I modified the
Your premise that embedded appliances are somehow doomed to use
pitifully
outdated processors is simply wrong.
Who said anything about pitifully outdated processors. I can buy a heck
of alot of CPU horsepower w/out buying the latest/greatest CPU.
As a matter of
I have a luggable FireWire drive which I am considering using for
backups and data mobility on a variety of machines and operating
systems (roughly, *BSD, Mac OS X, and (eventually) Linux).
I'd welcome any suggestions as to things to do or avoid. I'd rather
not get a ways down the road and
Hi,
Bryan, again you're missing the point :-) You're working out from just
processing power, in the embedded world you usually start from somewhere
else
In the case of my products, the requirement are small size, low cost, no
moving parts (no fans or disks), long life, low power, meaning a
Both the kernel and kernel.debug files are of exactly the same size - about 3.3 Megs .
This is inspite of having the DEBUG=-g option being set in the MYKERNEL directory. Any
other clues, why this could be happening. I also tried the other procedure of using
'make depend' etc as outlined in the
* Michael C . Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010630 14:05] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 05:47:49AM +, E.B. Dreger scribbled:
| 1. Is AIO SMP-safe?
AIO is not safe, SMP or not.
| 2. If not, how could one force coherency? (Read and rewrite locked
|a word from each cache line?) Is it
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:28:29 -0500
From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you point to some specific PRs about this or crashdumps before
(or at least while) taking pot shots at the AIO implementation?
In the mean time, until somebody can substantiate that claim... is AIO SMP
safe?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both the kernel and kernel.debug files are of exactly the same size -
about 3.3 Megs . This is inspite of having the DEBUG=-g option being set
in the MYKERNEL directory. Any other clues, why this could be happening.
I also tried the other procedure of using 'make
23 matches
Mail list logo
