In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce A. Mah writes:
: Unfortunately it's not guaranteed...a lot of new hardware has been
: released since December 1998 (the date of 2.2.8-RELEASE). :-p
Copy the 2.2.8 cdrom onto a disk. Put your sources in that tree.
Chroot. you now have the 2.2.8 compilers.
W
> Modified files:
> gnu/lib/libdialogchecklist.c menubox.c radiolist.c
> textbox.c tree.c yesno.c
> Log:
> Improve the interface provided by libdialog. Move a cursor around over
> the components and trigger actions based on its position. This reduces
>
> Igor Podlesny wrote:
>> > /*
>> > * Macro for finding the interface (ifnet structure) corresponding to one
>> > * of our IP addresses.
>> > */
>> > #define INADDR_TO_IFP(addr, ifp) \
>> > /* struct in_addr addr; */ \
>> > /* struct ifnet *ifp; */ \
>> > { \
>> > regi
/etc/rc.conf looks like this:
pccard_enable="YES"
pccard_mem="DEFAULT"
pccardd_flags=" -i 10 -i 15"
removable_interfaces="ep0 ep1"
network_interfaces="lo0"
(I have tried with and without that last lo0 line)
and /etc/defaults/pccard.conf looks like this:
config auto "ep0" 10
config auto "ep1"
|- Message log follows: ---|
| no valid recipients were found for this message |
|--|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unknown user
|---
Ok, so I finally got two identical "ep" cards to come up at the same time
and both work. Thanks.
But when I run:
sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=1
Nothing happens. They don't get put in promiscuous mode, and bridging does
not get turned on, even though I have bridging in my kernel.
Can an
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 04:37:46PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Jiangyi Liu has been working on mbuf limiting code for the past week or
> so. What he has is pretty complete, I expect to get most of it committed
> once Bosko gets back.
Well, I'm back. I'm now going to bed but my INBOX
Magnus wrote:
> What makes it even more wierd, is that I am able to resolv hostnames by
> using
> 'nslookup'.
> prompt # nslookup freebsd.org
> server: dnscache01.chello.no
> address: 212.186.255.29
>
> Name:Freebsd.org
> address: 216.136.204.21
>
> Wich means I am able to resolve hostnames
FreeBSD Alpha.chello.no 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD
I have a wierd problem, where the system is unable to resolve hostnames.
Even though I have configured resolv.conf, here is the output of the file:
search chello.no
nameserver 212.186.255.29
nameserver 212.186.255.30
I have checked the addresses, and
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> The proble is that teh ethernet header is 14 bytes so you must choose
> to allighn either the whole packet, or the IP header, but you cannot do
> both.
Hm, it seems to be a waste of CPU time memory bandwidth: only the
IP and TCP headers have to be aligned but the payl
On 17-Jul-01 Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
>
>> Actually, since the 486, it's been possible for us to turn on unaligned
>> access exceptions on the x86. We should probably consider doing this, to
>> ensure better performance, and to avoid the unnecessary bus overhead we
>> eat for unaligned access to
>
> Does anyone have a reference to the values of "type" field in the Intel
> BIOS physical system RAM mapping?
>
> I am curious why we are using only entries of type "0x01".
This table (from Ralf Brown's Interrupt List) is self-explanatory:
Values for System Memory Map address type:
01hm
Does anyone have a reference to the values of "type" field in the Intel
BIOS physical system RAM mapping?
I am curious why we are using only entries of type "0x01".
--mark tinguely.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dear fellow hackers
I haven't received any CTMs since July 12th. Am I the only one ?
My guess is that the main distribution point is malfunctioning.
Can anybody with closer access to the 'feeder' check into it ?
Thanks !
Ciao, dewrweil,
--
Carlo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Dillon([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.13 15:27:08 +:
> Also, do performance testing with dynamic-linked verses static-linked
> binaries. Static-linked binaries may look larger, but they have a
> much lower dirty-page overhead then the dynamically linked equivalent.
> It depe
Can anyone tell me why FreeBSD has 256 bytes of spare space in the user
area? Thanks.
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Terry Lambert writes:
> "Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
>>> The defaults for the Linux emulator are different than
>>> the defaults for Linux. Linux sets some stuff up wrong,
>>
>> FreeBSD sets stuff up wrong. This is a choice between bad
>> and worse, since the CPU does not support what you want.
>
Thus spake Terry Lambert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> A surprising number of people have expressed an interest
> in working on a package-based install in private email,
> so it's probably an idea whose time has come. We should
I think the base distribution will be a package in libh.
We will have more
: On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:45:29 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>One obvious reason that the Linux approach is wrong is
>that it ends up requiring the save and restore of FP
>registers on context switches, which is overhead they
>ate anyway, by doing TSS based context switching. The
>amount of state
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Richard Hodges wrote:
> > Go ahead and beat me up if you have to :-) But why is there _any_ issue
> > with RX buffer alignment? I get some mbufs and set the data pointer to
> > any point I want, or I get a cluster, which is always on a 2k boundary.
>
> Actually, since the 486, it's been possible for us to turn on unaligned
> access exceptions on the x86. We should probably consider doing this, to
> ensure better performance, and to avoid the unnecessary bus overhead we
> eat for unaligned access today... not to mention how it could shake ou
"Albert D. Cahalan" wrote:
> >> There are only two shared libaries in common (libc and libm) and
> >> both are the same on FreeBSD (in /compat/linux) and Linux.
> >>
> >> So any ideas on where the program is going wrong?
> >
> > man fpsetround
>
> That won't change a thing. Both systems round to
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > > > Maybe I'm just plain dim today (I will add a beer to
> > > > rectify this situation at first convenience..) but what
> > > > is so bad about some trailing whitespace that a massive
> > > > commit-a-thlon is called for?
> > >
> > > You use emacs, don't you?
> >
> >
Here´s an explanation from today´s BIND-users traffic:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Path: not-for-mail
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind
Subject: Re: Am I wrong?
References: <9j1i3n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Genuity, Cambridge, MA
Higher-level servers
Bill Paul wrote:
> Now, before any of you armchair geniuses out there start chiming in
> with your incredibly brilliant solutions for this problem which you
> just made up on the spot, forget it. This issue has been discussed
> to death and there's just no easy way around it.
>
> Terry Lambert an
Richard Hodges wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Bill Paul wrote:
>
> > They're "okay." The NatSemi chip has one flaw, which is that RX buffers
> > must be aligned on a 64-bit boundary. None of the more expensive NICs have
> > this restriction.
>
> Go ahead and beat me up if you have to :-) But
On 16-Jul-01 Dan wrote:
>
> ya it seems it is running into swap abit.
> hmmm watching apache with truss i see alot of error #35's
> in the sys callswhat is that related to again?
>From sys/errno.h:
/* non-blocking and interrupt i/o */
#define EAGAIN 35 /* Resource
> If you look at the cache dumps and dig output below, you can clearly
> see the timeout for fuji.jamcracker.com is less then the timeout
> for jamcracker.com AFTER we've looked up other elements for fuji,
> which means that when it timed out, that IN A record will be gone.
>
"Eugene L. Vorokov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> maybe it's a bit offtopic, but still: how can I disable reboot on kernel
> panic in 15 seconds, so that it just hangs and I'm able to see what
> happened when I come ?
Set PANIC_REBOOT_WAIT_TIME to -1.
>
> Regards,
> Eugene
>
>
> T
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 04:34:52PM -0700, Dan wrote:
>
> ya it seems it is running into swap abit.
> hmmm watching apache with truss i see alot of error #35's
> in the sys callswhat is that related to again?
/usr/include/errno.h says:
#define EAGAIN 35 /* Resource t
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:26:22PM +0400, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe it's a bit offtopic, but still: how can I disable reboot on kernel
> panic in 15 seconds, so that it just hangs and I'm able to see what
> happened when I come ?
compile with DDB or if you enable crashdumps in
fixed.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harti Brandt writes:
>
>Could please somebody make this little, trivial and obviuos patch, I
>requested it a while ago, or should I make a PR for it??
>
>Hi,
>
>()s are missing around the macro argument in cv_waitq_empty. The call
>
>if(!(cv_waitq_e
Could please somebody make this little, trivial and obviuos patch, I
requested it a while ago, or should I make a PR for it??
Hi,
()s are missing around the macro argument in cv_waitq_empty. The call
if(!(cv_waitq_empty(&sc->foo_cv)))
...
will otherwise fail to compile
Hello,
maybe it's a bit offtopic, but still: how can I disable reboot on kernel
panic in 15 seconds, so that it just hangs and I'm able to see what
happened when I come ?
Regards,
Eugene
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the messag
look in /usr/include/net/if_var.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello.
> I am reading TCP/IP Illustrated and it is making references to variables in
> the BSD4.4 code. I would like to use these same variables, specifically the
> variable ifnet, which was declared in BSD4.4 as a struct ifnet *ifn
35 matches
Mail list logo
