Re: NewCard / pccbb

2001-08-04 Thread Mike Smith
Ok, now I need your dmesg again, since it's been trimmed and I've lost it. I also need to know what slots you have things in. Please don't cut the $PIR output off this message when you reply. Note that your system is something of a pathalogical worst-case; no PCI recommended interrupts,

Re: NewCard / pccbb

2001-08-04 Thread lists
Hi Mike, ok my pci-pcmcia bridge is in slot 0, my network card is in slot 3, below are the dmesg outputs from both oldcard and newcard, Thanks Andrew Newcard dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994

Re: promise ultra 100 tx2 on 4.3

2001-08-04 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Tim Yardley wrote: anyone have plans or already ported the ata pci/dma work in 5.0 over to 4.3 for the tx2 card? rumor has it soren is swamped... anyone else out there brave enough to take on the ata dev tree? I'll get to it, soon, is the -stable tree in code freeze now or am I

Re: gethostbyXXXX_r()

2001-08-04 Thread Richard Seaman, Jr.
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:04:02AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alexander Litvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010803 09:54] wrote: Are there any plans of making gethostbyname_r() and gethostbyaddr_r() available in FreeBSD? May be somebody already has them almost ready

Re: How to visit physical memory above 4G?

2001-08-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:38:23AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: This is a trivial implementation. I'm not very impressed. Personally, I'm not interested in a huge user space, Maybe not you, but I bet the database and scientific computing people

Re: gethostbyXXXX_r()

2001-08-04 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: There are some gethostby_r, getnetby_r, ... etc routines in the linuxthreads port (/usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads/files). These came from the original linuxthreads package, and have no copyright on them. I never researched the

Re: Fwd: Sun Grid Engine 5.2.3 Available. Now Open Source

2001-08-04 Thread Ron Chen
I am writing a document about porting SGE. Once that's done, you guys can hack! -Ron --- Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron Chen wrote: It's weekend, it's time for hacking. I downloaded the SGE 5.3 source code. Played with it for a while, the 50+MB of source does have some

Re: linking WITH -lstdc++ makes executeables smaller?

2001-08-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: I used a library which also needed -lstdc++. Now that I did not need them any more I removed them and was surprised that the resulting FreeBSD binary actually got bigger! On NetBSD the binary is slightly smaller as expected. Is

Re: Finding filesizes in C++ for files greater than 4gb

2001-08-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:29:39PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: Kent, my point is that the manual page should specify this. I think that's the point the original poster was trying to make once he was told. Well, either of you two submit a diff to the manpage and I'll commit it. It really isn't

Re: linking WITH -lstdc++ makes executeables smaller?

2001-08-04 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:58:34PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: I used a library which also needed -lstdc++. Now that I did not need them any more I removed them and was surprised that the resulting FreeBSD binary actually got

Re: gethostbyXXXX_r()

2001-08-04 Thread Dan Moschuk
| Are there any plans of making gethostbyname_r() and gethostbyaddr_r() | available in FreeBSD? May be somebody already has them almost ready | to be commited? Or are there any considered wrong way to go? | | The reason I'm asking is that I actually have a local patch implementing | them

Re: How to visit physical memory above 4G?

2001-08-04 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 10:57 PM -0700 8/3/01, Terry Lambert wrote: Rik van Riel wrote: This is a trivial implementation. I'm not very impressed. Personally, I'm not interested in a huge user space, Maybe not you, but I bet the database and scientific computing people will be interested in having 64 GB